Menu

Test Charts / Auto Express

2025 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R17
Tyres tested
8
Disciplines
11

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
30 m Best
30.71 m +0.71 m
31.25 m +1.25 m
31.35 m +1.35 m
31.98 m +1.98 m
32.5 m +2.50 m
32.72 m +2.72 m
32.75 m +2.75 m

The difference between best and worst was 9.2% (2.75 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
58 s Best
58.53 s +0.53 s
59 s +1.00 s
59.18 s +1.18 s
59.3 s +1.30 s
59.55 s +1.55 s
59.61 s +1.61 s
59.73 s +1.73 s

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
35 m Best
35.43 m +0.43 m
35.57 m +0.57 m
36.34 m +1.34 m
37 m +2.00 m
37.35 m +2.35 m
37.8 m +2.80 m
40.37 m +5.37 m

The difference between best and worst was 15.3% (5.37 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
60 s Best
60.24 s +0.24 s
60.61 s +0.61 s
60.85 s +0.85 s
60.85 s +0.85 s
60.98 s +0.98 s
61.54 s +1.54 s
64.66 s +4.66 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (4.66 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
91.53 km/h Best
90.29 km/h -1.24 km/h
89.29 km/h -2.24 km/h
87.34 km/h -4.19 km/h
84.66 km/h -6.87 km/h
84.57 km/h -6.96 km/h
81.14 km/h -10.39 km/h
80 km/h -11.53 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (11.53 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
105.9 m/sec2 Best
97.36 m/sec2 -8.54 m/sec2
95.11 m/sec2 -10.79 m/sec2
94.59 m/sec2 -11.31 m/sec2
83.73 m/sec2 -22.17 m/sec2
83.14 m/sec2 -22.76 m/sec2
70.71 m/sec2 -35.19 m/sec2
70 m/sec2 -35.90 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 33.9% (35.9 m/sec2).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
40 m Best
40.69 m +0.69 m
40.9 m +0.90 m
40.94 m +0.94 m
41.11 m +1.11 m
41.28 m +1.28 m
42.6 m +2.60 m
44 m +4.00 m

The difference between best and worst was 10% (4 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
10 s Best
10.19 s +0.19 s
10.2 s +0.20 s
10.29 s +0.29 s
10.33 s +0.33 s
10.55 s +0.55 s
10.99 s +0.99 s
11.04 s +1.04 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.4% (1.04 s).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
60 s Best
61.41 s +1.41 s
62.5 s +2.50 s
62.7 s +2.70 s
63.97 s +3.97 s
65.01 s +5.01 s
65.43 s +5.43 s
65.5 s +5.50 s

The difference between best and worst was 9.2% (5.5 s).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70 dB Best
70.21 dB +0.21 dB
70.28 dB +0.28 dB
70.28 dB +0.28 dB
70.42 dB +0.42 dB
70.78 dB +0.78 dB
70.85 dB +0.85 dB
71.43 dB +1.43 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
8 kg/t Best £0
8.12 kg/t +0.12 kg/t £7
8.6 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £33
8.87 kg/t +0.87 kg/t £48
9.21 kg/t +1.21 kg/t £67
9.74 kg/t +1.74 kg/t £96
9.83 kg/t +1.83 kg/t £101
10.7 kg/t +2.70 kg/t £149

The difference between best and worst was 33.8% (2.7 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 103 L (£149) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.