Test Charts / Auto Express
2025 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R17
- Tyres tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 11
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 30 m | Best | |
| 30.71 m | +0.71 m | |
| 31.25 m | +1.25 m | |
| 31.35 m | +1.35 m | |
| 31.98 m | +1.98 m | |
| 32.5 m | +2.50 m | |
| 32.72 m | +2.72 m | |
| 32.75 m | +2.75 m |
The difference between best and worst was 9.2% (2.75 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 58 s | Best | |
| 58.53 s | +0.53 s | |
| 59 s | +1.00 s | |
| 59.18 s | +1.18 s | |
| 59.3 s | +1.30 s | |
| 59.55 s | +1.55 s | |
| 59.61 s | +1.61 s | |
| 59.73 s | +1.73 s |
All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 35 m | Best | |
| 35.43 m | +0.43 m | |
| 35.57 m | +0.57 m | |
| 36.34 m | +1.34 m | |
| 37 m | +2.00 m | |
| 37.35 m | +2.35 m | |
| 37.8 m | +2.80 m | |
| 40.37 m | +5.37 m |
The difference between best and worst was 15.3% (5.37 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 60 s | Best | |
| 60.24 s | +0.24 s | |
| 60.61 s | +0.61 s | |
| 60.85 s | +0.85 s | |
| 60.85 s | +0.85 s | |
| 60.98 s | +0.98 s | |
| 61.54 s | +1.54 s | |
| 64.66 s | +4.66 s |
The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (4.66 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 91.53 km/h | Best | |
| 90.29 km/h | -1.24 km/h | |
| 89.29 km/h | -2.24 km/h | |
| 87.34 km/h | -4.19 km/h | |
| 84.66 km/h | -6.87 km/h | |
| 84.57 km/h | -6.96 km/h | |
| 81.14 km/h | -10.39 km/h | |
| 80 km/h | -11.53 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (11.53 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 105.9 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 97.36 m/sec2 | -8.54 m/sec2 | |
| 95.11 m/sec2 | -10.79 m/sec2 | |
| 94.59 m/sec2 | -11.31 m/sec2 | |
| 83.73 m/sec2 | -22.17 m/sec2 | |
| 83.14 m/sec2 | -22.76 m/sec2 | |
| 70.71 m/sec2 | -35.19 m/sec2 | |
| 70 m/sec2 | -35.90 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 33.9% (35.9 m/sec2).
Snow
3Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40 m | Best | |
| 40.69 m | +0.69 m | |
| 40.9 m | +0.90 m | |
| 40.94 m | +0.94 m | |
| 41.11 m | +1.11 m | |
| 41.28 m | +1.28 m | |
| 42.6 m | +2.60 m | |
| 44 m | +4.00 m |
The difference between best and worst was 10% (4 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10 s | Best | |
| 10.19 s | +0.19 s | |
| 10.2 s | +0.20 s | |
| 10.29 s | +0.29 s | |
| 10.33 s | +0.33 s | |
| 10.55 s | +0.55 s | |
| 10.99 s | +0.99 s | |
| 11.04 s | +1.04 s |
The difference between best and worst was 10.4% (1.04 s).
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 60 s | Best | |
| 61.41 s | +1.41 s | |
| 62.5 s | +2.50 s | |
| 62.7 s | +2.70 s | |
| 63.97 s | +3.97 s | |
| 65.01 s | +5.01 s | |
| 65.43 s | +5.43 s | |
| 65.5 s | +5.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 9.2% (5.5 s).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70 dB | Best | |
| 70.21 dB | +0.21 dB | |
| 70.28 dB | +0.28 dB | |
| 70.28 dB | +0.28 dB | |
| 70.42 dB | +0.42 dB | |
| 70.78 dB | +0.78 dB | |
| 70.85 dB | +0.85 dB | |
| 71.43 dB | +1.43 dB |
All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 8.12 kg/t | +0.12 kg/t | £7 | |
| 8.6 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £33 | |
| 8.87 kg/t | +0.87 kg/t | £48 | |
| 9.21 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | £67 | |
| 9.74 kg/t | +1.74 kg/t | £96 | |
| 9.83 kg/t | +1.83 kg/t | £101 | |
| 10.7 kg/t | +2.70 kg/t | £149 |
The difference between best and worst was 33.8% (2.7 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 103 L (£149) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test
225/45 R1715 tyres tested
7 of these 8 tyres tested again
2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17
225/50 R1716 tyres tested
6 of these 8 tyres tested again
2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets
245/45 R1950 tyres tested
5 of these 8 tyres tested again

