Menu

Triangle WinterX TW401

The Triangle WinterX TW401 is a Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
65%
Wet Grip
65%
Road Feedback
50%
Handling
50%
Wear
55%
Comfort
45%
Buy again
10%
Snow Grip
35%
Ice Grip
45%
2 Reviews
47% Average
13,000 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 23rd)
Triangle WinterX TW401

Triangle WinterX TW401

Winter Economy
BETA
6.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
88.3
0.32x / 1 test
Snow
73.3
1.5x / 5 tests
Value
61.7
0.42x / 3 tests
Dry
57.7
1.13x / 3 tests
Ice
57.6
1.2x / 1 test
Wet
54.2
1.93x / 9 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
65.9
2 tests
Braking
60.8
9 tests
Handling
49.7
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 3
Period: 2022 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 2
Avg Rating: 46.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.63
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test Auto Express 2025 225/45 R17 8/8 11 metrics
2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 14/16 10 metrics
2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 46/57 1 metrics
3
Tests
23rd
Average
8th
Best
46th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
8th/8
Auto Express says the budget Triangle is better than a summer tyre in snowy conditions but warns that it is “worryingly poor in the wet” and that buying it “is false economy”. Its snow performance is acceptable, but its weak wet grip and high running‑costs undermine its low purchase price.
14th/16
The Triangle WinterX TW401 receives a poor rating for driving safety due to its significant weaknesses on wet roads, despite decent performance on dry and snowy surfaces. It offers satisfactory feedback and precision on dry roads, with good control at its limits. However, on wet surfaces, it has a very low grip level and a tendency to understeer or oversteer early, resulting in poor handling. Its braking performance is also only just satisfactory, and its aquaplaning resistance is poor. On snow, it performs well with good braking, traction, and handling. Its environmental performance is average, with a satisfactory lifespan and low abrasion, weight, and fuel consumption, but negative marks for manufacturing residues on new tyres.
46th/57

Questions and Answers for the Triangle WinterX TW401

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Triangle WinterX TW401. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

How would you rate the Triangle WinterX TW401?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Triangle WinterX TW401 Reviews

Given 36% while driving a Volvo v70 D5 (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 5,000 average miles
TW401... This tire is ok on dry frozen asphalt, not too bad at a thin layer of fresh snow, but in everything else (wet, dry with warmer temperatures, a bit more snow like 2cm+ and it doesn't matter if it's wet snow or dry) it's garbage. 0 confidence compared to Hankook, Yokohama, Sailun, Falken, Maxxis, Taurus(Kormoran)... 2nd worst i've ever driven, absolute worst was Westlake, but that was like 10 years ago. You can think if it's so bad, maybe it will last... – It doesn't, it's below average. You pay less and you get way less than expected, one of the worst value for money. This is my experience, yours could be different.
October 9, 2024
Given 58% while driving a Opel Astra G (195/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
after ~7000km of use - stay away from snow. 95% of the time I were driving on snow less roads. Didnt have much snow this winter but I did buy these TRIANGLE WINTERX TW401 becouse they did show good result on wet/ice in 1 and only test I found. Yes, they were realy ok on these. I knew they wont be excelent with deep snow - and I guess it right, but still driveable. My guess - after 3000km they do lose his best rubber for snow preformance. Now on the dry and wet they still ok, (the wear of fronts is 3mm). There is no way I will swap axles for the next winter. Just - keep going all summer or buy summer tires. Dont use/buy it if u are a line to line quick changer. They have soft sidewalls. I was expecting stronger sidewalls as they are made for middle europe winters. I would recomend these tires for down side england or channel island weathers in winter.
March 25, 2021
Rate the Triangle WinterX TW401