Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tyres tested
11
Disciplines
14
Test vehicle
VW T-Roc

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
34.9 m -2.10 m 0 km/h
37 m Best 0 km/h
37.6 m +0.60 m 16 km/h
38.2 m +1.20 m 23 km/h
38.4 m +1.40 m 25 km/h
38.5 m +1.50 m 26 km/h
39.3 m +2.30 m 31 km/h
40.1 m +3.10 m 36 km/h
40.6 m +3.60 m 39 km/h
41.2 m +4.20 m 42 km/h
41.5 m +4.50 m 43 km/h
41.6 m +4.60 m 43 km/h
RefReference Winter
43.3 m +6.30 m 50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 24.1% (8.4 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Viking Fourtech Plus would still be travelling at 43 km/h when the Linglong Sport Master 4S had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
96.3 km/h +3.00 km/h
93.3 km/h Best
93.1 km/h -0.20 km/h
92.6 km/h -0.70 km/h
92.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
92.2 km/h -1.10 km/h
92.1 km/h -1.20 km/h
91.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
91.8 km/h -1.50 km/h
91.7 km/h -1.60 km/h
91.6 km/h -1.70 km/h
91.1 km/h -2.20 km/h
RefReference Winter
90 km/h -3.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (6.3 Km/H).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
55 m -3.00 m 0 km/h
58 m Best 0 km/h
60.4 m +2.40 m 26 km/h
61 m +3.00 m 29 km/h
61.3 m +3.30 m 30 km/h
61.3 m +3.30 m 30 km/h
RefReference Winter
61.5 m +3.50 m 31 km/h
62.2 m +4.20 m 34 km/h
62.4 m +4.40 m 35 km/h
62.5 m +4.50 m 35 km/h
62.8 m +4.80 m 36 km/h
65.1 m +7.10 m 43 km/h
78 m +20.00 m 66 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 41.8% (23 m ≈ 5.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Arivo Carlorful AS would still be travelling at 66 km/h when the Vredestein Quatrac had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
85 km/h +1.60 km/h
83.4 km/h Best
81.5 km/h -1.90 km/h
81.4 km/h -2.00 km/h
81.3 km/h -2.10 km/h
RefReference Winter
80.8 km/h -2.60 km/h
80.5 km/h -2.90 km/h
79.9 km/h -3.50 km/h
79.9 km/h -3.50 km/h
79.8 km/h -3.60 km/h
78.9 km/h -4.50 km/h
77.5 km/h -5.90 km/h
72.4 km/h -11.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (12.6 Km/H).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
15.27 s -0.87 s
16.14 s Best
16.19 s +0.05 s
16.31 s +0.17 s
16.32 s +0.18 s
16.34 s +0.20 s
RefReference Winter
16.35 s +0.21 s
16.35 s +0.21 s
16.36 s +0.22 s
16.37 s +0.23 s
16.47 s +0.33 s
16.51 s +0.37 s
16.97 s +0.83 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (1.7 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
82.6 km/h +5.10 km/h
RefReference Winter
79.4 km/h +1.90 km/h
77.5 km/h Best
77.1 km/h -0.40 km/h
76.4 km/h -1.10 km/h
76.3 km/h -1.20 km/h
74.6 km/h -2.90 km/h
74.3 km/h -3.20 km/h
73.5 km/h -4.00 km/h
73 km/h -4.50 km/h
71.9 km/h -5.60 km/h
71.2 km/h -6.30 km/h
70.4 km/h -7.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (12.2 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
3.3 m/sec2 +0.13 m/sec2
RefReference Winter
3.24 m/sec2 +0.07 m/sec2
3.17 m/sec2 Best
2.78 m/sec2 -0.39 m/sec2
2.68 m/sec2 -0.49 m/sec2
2.63 m/sec2 -0.54 m/sec2
2.59 m/sec2 -0.58 m/sec2
2.57 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
2.45 m/sec2 -0.72 m/sec2
2.4 m/sec2 -0.77 m/sec2
2.38 m/sec2 -0.79 m/sec2
2.34 m/sec2 -0.83 m/sec2
2.26 m/sec2 -0.91 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 31.5% (1.04 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Winter
22.1 m -0.30 m 0 km/h
22.4 m Best 0 km/h
22.4 m Best 0 km/h
22.8 m +0.40 m 17 km/h
23 m +0.60 m 21 km/h
23 m +0.60 m 21 km/h
23.2 m +0.80 m 24 km/h
23.6 m +1.20 m 29 km/h
23.8 m +1.40 m 32 km/h
24.1 m +1.70 m 35 km/h
25 m +2.60 m 42 km/h
26 m +3.60 m 48 km/h
RefReference Summer
47 m +24.60 m 94 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 112.7% (24.9 m ≈ 5.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Linglong Sport Master 4S would still be travelling at 48 km/h when the Vredestein Quatrac had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
3584 N +73.00 N
3511 N Best
3511 N Best
3504 N -7.00 N
3457 N -54.00 N
3442 N -69.00 N
3367 N -144.00 N
3338 N -173.00 N
3324 N -187.00 N
3317 N -194.00 N
3302 N -209.00 N
3168 N -343.00 N
RefReference Summer
1584 N -1,927.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 55.8% (2,000 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
104.1 km/h Best
RefReference Winter
103 km/h -1.10 km/h
102.7 km/h -1.40 km/h
102.7 km/h -1.40 km/h
101.8 km/h -2.30 km/h
100.5 km/h -3.60 km/h
100 km/h -4.10 km/h
100 km/h -4.10 km/h
98.6 km/h -5.50 km/h
98.5 km/h -5.60 km/h
97 km/h -7.10 km/h
96 km/h -8.10 km/h
RefReference Summer
64.7 km/h -39.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 37.8% (39.4 Km/H).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
4.23 m/sec2 +0.14 m/sec2
4.09 m/sec2 Best
4.06 m/sec2 -0.03 m/sec2
4.05 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
4.05 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.94 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
3.89 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.86 m/sec2 -0.23 m/sec2
3.81 m/sec2 -0.28 m/sec2
3.8 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
3.76 m/sec2 -0.33 m/sec2
3.69 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
RefReference Winter
1.92 m/sec2 -2.17 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 54.6% (2.31 m/sec2).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
8 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
5.3 Points -2.70 Points

The difference between best and worst was 33.8% (2.7 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.4 dB Best
70.5 dB +0.10 dB
71.1 dB +0.70 dB
71.6 dB +1.20 dB
71.8 dB +1.40 dB
72.2 dB +1.80 dB
72.2 dB +1.80 dB
72.4 dB +2.00 dB
72.6 dB +2.20 dB
72.8 dB +2.40 dB
RefReference Winter
73.1 dB +2.70 dB
73.7 dB +3.30 dB
RefReference Summer
73.9 dB +3.50 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5% (3.5 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.31 kg/t Best £0
7.44 kg/t +0.13 kg/t £8
7.44 kg/t +0.13 kg/t £8
7.51 kg/t +0.20 kg/t £12
7.59 kg/t +0.28 kg/t £17
7.67 kg/t +0.36 kg/t £22
7.71 kg/t +0.40 kg/t £24
7.82 kg/t +0.51 kg/t £31
7.85 kg/t +0.54 kg/t £33
7.89 kg/t +0.58 kg/t £35
8.06 kg/t +0.75 kg/t £45
RefReference Winter
8.37 kg/t +1.06 kg/t £64
RefReference Summer
8.38 kg/t +1.07 kg/t £65

The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (1.07 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master 4S uses about 31 L (£45) more fuel than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.