Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2025 Auto Bild Allrad 215/55 R17 SUV Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tyres tested
12
Disciplines
14
Test vehicle
VW T-Roc

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
36.92 m -4.14 m 0 km/h
41.06 m Best 0 km/h
41.57 m +0.51 m 14 km/h
41.94 m +0.88 m 19 km/h
42.28 m +1.22 m 22 km/h
42.28 m +1.22 m 22 km/h
42.58 m +1.52 m 25 km/h
42.59 m +1.53 m 25 km/h
42.83 m +1.77 m 26 km/h
42.98 m +1.92 m 27 km/h
43.24 m +2.18 m 29 km/h
43.47 m +2.41 m 31 km/h
44.34 m +3.28 m 35 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 20.1% (7.42 m ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 would still be travelling at 35 km/h when the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
101.6 km/h +2.30 km/h
99.3 km/h Best
99.3 km/h Best
99 km/h -0.30 km/h
98.8 km/h -0.50 km/h
98.6 km/h -0.70 km/h
98.5 km/h -0.80 km/h
98.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
98.3 km/h -1.00 km/h
98.3 km/h -1.00 km/h
98.1 km/h -1.20 km/h
97.6 km/h -1.70 km/h
97.2 km/h -2.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (4.4 Km/H).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
39.7 m -4.10 m 0 km/h
43.8 m Best 0 km/h
45.1 m +1.30 m 22 km/h
45.2 m +1.40 m 23 km/h
45.4 m +1.60 m 24 km/h
45.5 m +1.70 m 25 km/h
46 m +2.20 m 28 km/h
47.5 m +3.70 m 36 km/h
48.5 m +4.70 m 40 km/h
49 m +5.20 m 42 km/h
49.3 m +5.50 m 43 km/h
50.8 m +7.00 m 48 km/h
53.5 m +9.70 m 55 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 34.8% (13.8 m ≈ 3.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 would still be travelling at 55 km/h when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
84.7 km/h +2.10 km/h
82.6 km/h Best
82.3 km/h -0.30 km/h
82.2 km/h -0.40 km/h
81.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
81.4 km/h -1.20 km/h
81.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
81 km/h -1.60 km/h
80.4 km/h -2.20 km/h
79.3 km/h -3.30 km/h
77.9 km/h -4.70 km/h
75.5 km/h -7.10 km/h
73.5 km/h -9.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (11.2 Km/H).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
15.21 s -0.95 s
16.16 s Best
16.17 s +0.01 s
16.17 s +0.01 s
16.18 s +0.02 s
16.29 s +0.13 s
16.4 s +0.24 s
16.41 s +0.25 s
16.53 s +0.37 s
16.58 s +0.42 s
16.66 s +0.50 s
17.25 s +1.09 s
17.55 s +1.39 s

The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (2.34 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
83.3 km/h Best
81.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
81.3 km/h -2.00 km/h
RefReference Summer
79.4 km/h -3.90 km/h
79.4 km/h -3.90 km/h
79 km/h -4.30 km/h
78.2 km/h -5.10 km/h
77.8 km/h -5.50 km/h
77.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
77.4 km/h -5.90 km/h
75.4 km/h -7.90 km/h
74.9 km/h -8.40 km/h
73.5 km/h -9.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (9.8 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.58 m/sec2 Best
3.53 m/sec2 -0.05 m/sec2
3.48 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
3.43 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.28 m/sec2
3.26 m/sec2 -0.32 m/sec2
3.24 m/sec2 -0.34 m/sec2
3.21 m/sec2 -0.37 m/sec2
3.18 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3.15 m/sec2 -0.43 m/sec2
3.13 m/sec2 -0.45 m/sec2
2.94 m/sec2 -0.64 m/sec2
2.84 m/sec2 -0.74 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 20.7% (0.74 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
22.9 m Best 0 km/h
23.1 m +0.20 m 12 km/h
23.2 m +0.30 m 15 km/h
23.3 m +0.40 m 17 km/h
23.3 m +0.40 m 17 km/h
23.4 m +0.50 m 19 km/h
23.8 m +0.90 m 25 km/h
24.1 m +1.20 m 29 km/h
24.7 m +1.80 m 35 km/h
24.7 m +1.80 m 35 km/h
25.8 m +2.90 m 44 km/h
26.2 m +3.30 m 46 km/h
RefReference Summer
37.2 m +14.30 m 81 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 62.4% (14.3 m ≈ 3.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 would still be travelling at 46 km/h when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3026 N Best
3023 N -3.00 N
2999 N -27.00 N
2990 N -36.00 N
2969 N -57.00 N
2966 N -60.00 N
2903 N -123.00 N
2721 N -305.00 N
2706 N -320.00 N
2580 N -446.00 N
2398 N -628.00 N
2353 N -673.00 N
RefReference Summer
963 N -2,063.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 68.2% (2,063 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
61.4 km/h Best
61.3 km/h -0.10 km/h
61 km/h -0.40 km/h
60.9 km/h -0.50 km/h
60.6 km/h -0.80 km/h
60.5 km/h -0.90 km/h
60.1 km/h -1.30 km/h
60.1 km/h -1.30 km/h
59.4 km/h -2.00 km/h
58.2 km/h -3.20 km/h
57.2 km/h -4.20 km/h
56.1 km/h -5.30 km/h
RefReference Summer
39.9 km/h -21.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 35% (21.5 Km/H).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TyreResultGap to best
4.6 m/sec2 Best
4.58 m/sec2 -0.02 m/sec2
4.5 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
4.47 m/sec2 -0.13 m/sec2
4.41 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
4.33 m/sec2 -0.27 m/sec2
4.32 m/sec2 -0.28 m/sec2
4.31 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
4.3 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
4.25 m/sec2 -0.35 m/sec2
4.17 m/sec2 -0.43 m/sec2
3.32 m/sec2 -1.28 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
2.18 m/sec2 -2.42 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 52.6% (2.42 m/sec2).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (1.3 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
71.7 dB Best
72 dB +0.30 dB
72.3 dB +0.60 dB
72.5 dB +0.80 dB
72.7 dB +1.00 dB
72.9 dB +1.20 dB
73.1 dB +1.40 dB
73.3 dB +1.60 dB
73.5 dB +1.80 dB
RefReference Summer
73.9 dB +2.20 dB
73.9 dB +2.20 dB
74.3 dB +2.60 dB
74.7 dB +3.00 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (3 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.11 kg/t Best £0
7.22 kg/t +0.11 kg/t £7
7.81 kg/t +0.70 kg/t £43
RefReference Summer
7.85 kg/t +0.74 kg/t £46
7.87 kg/t +0.76 kg/t £47
8 kg/t +0.89 kg/t £55
8.08 kg/t +0.97 kg/t £60
8.29 kg/t +1.18 kg/t £73
8.31 kg/t +1.20 kg/t £74
8.33 kg/t +1.22 kg/t £76
8.36 kg/t +1.25 kg/t £77
8.45 kg/t +1.34 kg/t £83
8.75 kg/t +1.64 kg/t £102

The difference between best and worst was 23.1% (1.64 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 uses about 70 L (£102) more fuel than the Michelin Alpin 7.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.

Where to buy

Affiliate links: if you buy, we may earn a commission. It never changes our tests, scores or recommendations. How we stay independent