Menu

Test source Car and Driver

2025 Car and Driver All Weather Tyre Test

Overall test winnerPirelli Cinturato WeatherActive

Car and Driver recently put five all-weather tyres to test to find the best option for drivers who want to run one set of rubber year-round.

Tyres tested
5
Tested size
225/45 R18
Disciplines
9

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

5 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2025 Car and Driver All Weather Tyre Test · 225/45 R18

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Car and Driver recently put five all-weather tyres to test to find the best option for drivers who want to run one set of rubber year-round. Using a BMW 330i xDrive for dry and wet testing at Tire Rack's South Bend facility and a Genesis G70 for snow evaluations at Michigan's Keweenaw Research Center, the magazine teamed up with expert drivers to collect objective performance data and subjective impressions across multiple driving scenarios.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
60 → 0 mph
Wet Braking
60 → 0 mph
Snow Braking
30 → 0 mph
Snow Traction
0 → 30 mph

To provide context for the all-weather results, Car and Driver included two specialized benchmark tyres in the evaluation: the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 summer tyre and the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 winter tyre. These showed what dedicated seasonal rubber can do when not compromising for year-round use. The Continental summer tyre demonstrated its wet-weather prowess with remarkably consistent stopping distances between dry and wet surfaces, while the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 winter tyre dominated in snow with substantially better acceleration and braking than any all-weather contender. These reference tyres help illustrate the performance trade-offs when choosing a single set of tyres versus seasonal swapping, giving buyers a clearer picture of what they gain – and give up – when opting for the convenience of all-weather rubber.

One quirk of the result had the CrossClimate 2 has the slowest around the snow handling lap, but was one of the best in the other snow tests. I think that might be a typo on the magazines part.

Some of the data is below, and be sure to head over to the C&D website for the full results.

Dry

Dry Braking

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (60 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefContinental ExtremeContact Sport 02
33.3 m -3.90 m 0 km/h
37.2 m Best 0 km/h
38.9 m +1.70 m 27 km/h
40 m +2.80 m 34 km/h
41 m +3.80 m 40 km/h
42.9 m +5.70 m 47 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 28.8% (9.6 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Bridgestone WeatherPeak would still be travelling at 47 km/h when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefContinental ExtremeContact Sport 02
29.4 s -1.00 s
30.4 s Best
30.5 s +0.10 s
30.7 s +0.30 s
30.7 s +0.30 s
31 s +0.60 s

The difference between best and worst was 5.4% (1.6 s).

Wet

Wet Braking

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (60 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefContinental ExtremeContact Sport 02
39.4 m -5.90 m 0 km/h
45.3 m Best 0 km/h
47.2 m +1.90 m 26 km/h
47.8 m +2.50 m 30 km/h
49.1 m +3.80 m 36 km/h
52.8 m +7.50 m 49 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 34% (13.4 m ≈ 3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nokian Remedy WRG5 would still be travelling at 49 km/h when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefContinental ExtremeContact Sport 02
31 s -2.30 s
33.3 s Best
33.4 s +0.10 s
33.5 s +0.20 s
34.2 s +0.90 s
35.3 s +2.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 13.9% (4.3 s).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefContinental ExtremeContact Sport 02
0.84 m/s +0.12 m/s
0.72 m/s Best
0.72 m/s Best
0.71 m/s -0.01 m/s
0.7 m/s -0.02 m/s
0.64 m/s -0.08 m/s

The difference between best and worst was 23.8% (0.2 m/s).

Snow

Snow Braking

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefNokian Hakkapeliitta R5
24.8 m -2.20 m 0 km/h
27 m Best 0 km/h
27.7 m +0.70 m 21 km/h
28.3 m +1.30 m 28 km/h
28.6 m +1.60 m 31 km/h
28.7 m +1.70 m 32 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (3.9 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady would still be travelling at 32 km/h when the Bridgestone WeatherPeak had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time (0 - 30 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefNokian Hakkapeliitta R5
6.5 s -1.00 s
7.5 s Best
8 s +0.50 s
8 s +0.50 s
8.1 s +0.60 s
8.1 s +0.60 s

The difference between best and worst was 24.6% (1.6 s).

Snow Handling

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefNokian Hakkapeliitta R5
80.4 s -6.20 s
86.6 s Best
92.5 s +5.90 s
94.4 s +7.80 s
94.9 s +8.30 s
97.9 s +11.30 s

The difference between best and worst was 21.8% (17.5 s).

Snow Circle

Snow Circle

Lateral snow grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Snow Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefNokian Hakkapeliitta R5
0.33 ms/2 +0.03 ms/2
0.3 ms/2 Best
0.29 ms/2 -0.01 ms/2
0.29 ms/2 -0.01 ms/2
0.29 ms/2 -0.01 ms/2
0.26 ms/2 -0.04 ms/2

The difference between best and worst was 21.2% (0.07 ms/2).

Results

1st

Pirelli Cinturato WeatherActive

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Pirelli Cinturato WeatherActive
The Cinturato WeatherActive emerged as the overall winner despite being the most affordable option at $219. It delivered exceptional dry performance with the most responsive and direct steering feel, making it incredibly easy to manage around the autocross track. The Pirelli also performed impressively in wet conditions (finishing a close second), offered a comfortable ride quality absorbing road imperfections well, and maintained respectable snow performance. Its V-formation directional tread pattern similar to Michelin's design likely contributed to its balanced year-round performance, proving you don't need to sacrifice everyday driving comfort when choosing an all-weather tyre.
Dry97.8%
Wet97.8%
Snow91.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 538.9 m+1.70 m
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 530.4 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 547.2 m+1.90 m
Wet HandlingLower is better2nd / 533.4 s+0.10 s
Wet CircleHigher is better3rd / 50.71 m/s-0.01 m/s
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 528.6 m+1.60 m
Snow TractionLower is better4th / 58.1 s+0.60 s
Snow HandlingLower is better3rd / 594.4 s+7.80 s
Snow CircleHigher is better5th / 50.26 ms/2-0.04 ms/2
3PMSF
Yes
Price
219.00
2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW

225/45 R18 95V XL
Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW
Despite being five years old, the $232 Michelin CrossClimate2 demonstrated excellent all-around capability with its distinctive tread pattern. It dominated wet testing, finishing first in every objective category with superior responsiveness to steering, braking, and acceleration inputs. In snow, it excelled particularly in braking with impressive longitudinal grip. However, the CrossClimate2 showed resolute understeer in dry conditions, making it difficult to rotate through courses. Additionally, testers noted a firm ride quality that felt jumpy over anything larger than small imperfections and higher noise levels on smooth surfaces, which likely contributed to its second-place finish despite its wet-weather dominance.
Dry99.8%
Wet100%
Snow94.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 537.2 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better2nd / 530.5 s+0.10 s
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 545.3 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 533.3 sBest in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better1st / 50.72 m/sBest in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 527.7 m+0.70 m
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 58 s+0.50 s
Snow HandlingLower is better5th / 597.9 s+11.30 s
Snow CircleHigher is better1st / 50.3 ms/2Best in this discipline
3PMSF
Yes
Price
232.00
3rd

Bridgestone WeatherPeak

225/45 R18 95V XL
Bridgestone WeatherPeak
The $224 Bridgestone WeatherPeak was the clear snow performance champion, delivering the quickest acceleration, fastest snow-covered autocross time, and shortest stopping distance in winter conditions. It also earned top marks for comfort, with the quietest cabin noise measurement of 65 decibels at highway speeds. However, its snow-focused design compromised dry and wet performance significantly - it tied for the slowest time around the dry autocross, had braking distances more than a car length longer than the best performers, and finished second-to-last in wet testing. The squishy tread that contributed to comfort also caused an annoying tendency to wander and tramline on highways.
Dry92.4%
Wet94.8%
Snow99.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 542.9 m+5.70 m
Dry HandlingLower is better5th / 531 s+0.60 s
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 549.1 m+3.80 m
Wet HandlingLower is better4th / 534.2 s+0.90 s
Wet CircleHigher is better4th / 50.7 m/s-0.02 m/s
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 527 mBest in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better1st / 57.5 sBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better1st / 586.6 sBest in this discipline
Snow CircleHigher is better2nd / 50.29 ms/2-0.01 ms/2
3PMSF
Yes
Price
224.00
4th

Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady

225/45 R18 95V XL
Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady
As the successor to the tyre that invented the all-season category in 1977, the $221 Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady delivered solid dry performance and above-average wet results, but struggled significantly in snow. Keeping the Goodyear-equipped vehicle pointed straight on snow was described as "nothing short of exhausting," requiring constant countersteering to avoid unrecoverable slides. It finished last in snow braking (arguably the most important winter metric for crash avoidance), though it did manage the second-quickest time around the snowcross loop. The tyre is due to be replaced by the WeatherReady 2, which wasn't available for testing but may address these winter performance deficits.
Dry94.9%
Wet97.1%
Snow94.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 541 m+3.80 m
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 530.7 s+0.30 s
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 547.8 m+2.50 m
Wet HandlingLower is better3rd / 533.5 s+0.20 s
Wet CircleHigher is better1st / 50.72 m/sBest in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 528.7 m+1.70 m
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 58 s+0.50 s
Snow HandlingLower is better2nd / 592.5 s+5.90 s
Snow CircleHigher is better2nd / 50.29 ms/2-0.01 ms/2
3PMSF
Yes
Price
221.00
5th

Nokian Remedy WRG5

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Nokian Remedy WRG5
Despite finishing last overall, the newest tyre in the test, the $220 Nokian Remedy WRG5, offered two significant advantages: the best warranty (60,000 miles with no age limit) and strong performance in both dry conditions and snow. In winter testing, it worked as hard as the top-scoring tyres to fight understeer and achieved the highest peak speed (63 mph) around the snowcross track. However, its wet performance was dismal - stopping distances were nearly 25 feet longer than the best performer, and it induced dangerous oversteer on the wet autocross and slalom. This poor wet-weather behavior overshadowed its strengths and ultimately cost it in the final rankings.
Dry96%
Wet90.1%
Snow93.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 540 m+2.80 m
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 530.7 s+0.30 s
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 552.8 m+7.50 m
Wet HandlingLower is better5th / 535.3 s+2.00 s
Wet CircleHigher is better5th / 50.64 m/s-0.08 m/s
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 528.3 m+1.30 m
Snow TractionLower is better4th / 58.1 s+0.60 s
Snow HandlingLower is better4th / 594.9 s+8.30 s
Snow CircleHigher is better2nd / 50.29 ms/2-0.01 ms/2
3PMSF
Yes
Price
220.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

2 comments
  1. Eray archived

    Hello,
    Could you compare Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 and SportContact 7?
    What are the differences regarding performance and market position?
    Thank you.

    #10097
    1. TyreReviews Eray archived

      It's pretty niche but I would like to do it one day. Basically SC7 will have better wet grip and lower rolling resistance and the ECS02 will last longer.

      #10101
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.