Menu

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW is a modified version of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for the US market, with the AW standing for All Weather.

The CC2 AW differs from the EU version with a 60,000 mile treadwear warranty and a slightly stiffer construction, but should offer similar overall levels of grip. There are passenger car and SUV version of the CrossClimate 2 AW.

9.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
88%
Road Feedback
77%
Handling
55%
Wear
85%
Comfort
90%
Buy again
98%
4 Reviews
83% Average
19,500 miles driven
4 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW

All Weather Premium
BETA
9.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Ice
95.5
1.2x / 3 tests
Dry
91.7
1.5x / 8 tests
Wet
87
2x / 12 tests
Snow
83.9
1.38x / 12 tests
Value
68
0.38x / 2 tests
Comfort
53.6
0.29x / 3 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
93.1
13 tests
Traction
82.8
5 tests
Handling
80.6
13 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 4
Publications: 3
Period: 2024 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 4
Avg Rating: 83.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.38
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2024 TireRack All Season and Weather Tyre Test Tire Rack 2025 215/55 R17 6/11 9 metrics
2025 Car and Driver All Weather Tyre Test Car and Driver 2025 225/45 R18 2/7 9 metrics
The 7 BEST All Weather Tyres Tested Tyre Reviews 2025 225/65 R17 1/9 19 metrics
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 2024 235/55 R18 1/3 3 metrics
4
Tests
3rd
Average
1st
Best
6th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
1st/9
Best overall in the dry, best overall in the wet, Best overall in the snow, excellent on ice, lowest rolling resistance on test.
Expensive, slightly reduced comfort.
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW might be getting on in years, but it is still the category leading all weather tyre. It somehow manages to blend the best grip in nearly all conditions with the lowest rolling resistance, a hugely impressive blend of qualities.

Test Winner 2025 All Weather Test Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW
The Michelin CrossClimate2 lives up to its reputation as a benchmark, delivering a composed and comfortable road ride with light, eager steering. On the track, its straight-line traction is impressive in the wet, though it can push a little when cornering hard in both wet and dry conditions. Where it truly shines is in winter conditions, where it stands head and shoulders above the competition in this test, offering athletic and confidence-inspiring performance in the snow and on ice.
Despite being five years old, the $232 Michelin CrossClimate2 demonstrated excellent all-around capability with its distinctive tread pattern. It dominated wet testing, finishing first in every objective category with superior responsiveness to steering, braking, and acceleration inputs. In snow, it excelled particularly in braking with impressive longitudinal grip. However, the CrossClimate2 showed resolute understeer in dry conditions, making it difficult to rotate through courses. Additionally, testers noted a firm ride quality that felt jumpy over anything larger than small imperfections and higher noise levels on smooth surfaces, which likely contributed to its second-place finish despite its wet-weather dominance.

Questions and Answers for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

YouTube Review

Top 3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Acura rdx 2.3l turbo sh awd (235/55 R19) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
A lot of the score categories are difficult to estimate for my car, my driving style, and perhaps most notably, the traffic in my region (Washington state, Seattle area) which is usually very dense. It's too early to rate wear, and I don't think it would be fair to rate them on handling because it's an SUV that I don't push terribly hard in cornering and such. Compared to the outgoing stock all-season Continental Sport LXs, these tires are absolutely a step up. The main reason I got these is because of all the research I've done, including watching nearly every relevant video Jonathan has provided. They're perfect for a year-round tire in the PNW. We don't get the severe arctic winters of Canada or Minnesota, but our winters can be challenging because unlike a region that snows, sticks, and stays well below freezing for a period of time, the Pacific Northwest gets winters where the temperature fluctuates just above and below freezing. So it rains during the day in the high 30s, then dips below freezing during the night and you get a lovely sheet of ice to wake up to. Then it melts, rains, and repeats the process all over again. Our snow turns to slush almost immediately giving you a wet slushy mess to drive on. Only twice in my life here have I seen the need for true winter tires. Otherwise, the CrossClimate2 is an excellent all-around tire that easily beats any [American] all-season offering. Noise and comfort are good, wear is predicted to be very good, and having a winter-rated tire when you need it makes it a slam-dunk in my opinion for my style of car, my style of driving, and my climate.
Ask a question | Helpful 914
March 3, 2025
Given 89% while driving a Mazda Cx90 (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 500 average miles
Been using cross climates for 2 different cars now for my all year round. Pretty reliable even in snow, car is just a bit heavy that you need to break in advance.
December 1, 2025
Given 87% while driving a Subaru Impreza (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
I live in the south so snow is rare but with my Subaru awd and these tire i feel fine driving at any rate in rain or shine I’ve have these tires for roughly 15000 miles so far wear seems good but I haven’t measured it so I’ll leave it as N/A
December 1, 2025
Have you driven on the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW >

Latest Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Lexus IS250 RWD (245/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
I am using the Michelin CC2 AW (USA SPEC) on my 2007 Lexus IS250 6MT. I have these tires mounted in 245/45/18 size (the OEM size is 255/40/18) but they fit great on my OEM wheels in a different size. I love how soft and comfortable they were compared to my Michelin Pilot Sport AS4 tires I ran previously. I find the grip to be significantly less than the Pilot Sports, where when cornering hard on highway entrance ramps, my car often triggers the traction control light (something I did not experience on my Pilot Sport AS4 tires). The tires are quiet at this time (only 3k miles on them) and I have not noticed a hit in fuel economy where I still average 26-27mpg during my daily commute at (45 degrees Fahrenheit) of 23 miles one way, and 23 miles back home at 60mph. Overall I do enjoy the tires, I feel they will offer much improved longevity compared to my Pilot Sport AS4 tires I had before. The tradeoff is dry and wet grip with a significant increase in ice, snow grip, and longevity.
December 8, 2025