Test Charts / Tyre Reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs SuperSport vs SuperSport R
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 235/35 R19
- Tyres tested
- 3
- Disciplines
- 8
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
3Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 33 m | Best | |
| 34.3 m | +1.30 m | |
| 35.2 m | +2.20 m |
The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (2.2 m ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 91.11 s | Best | |
| 91.53 s | +0.42 s | |
| 92.98 s | +1.87 s |
All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (2 Points).
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.5 m | Best | |
| 35.6 m | +1.10 m | |
| 43.2 m | +8.70 m |
The difference between best and worst was 25.2% (8.7 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 88.95 s | Best | |
| 90.36 s | +1.41 s | |
| 100.95 s | +12.00 s |
The difference between best and worst was 13.5% (12 s).
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 5 Points | -4.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 44.4% (4 Points).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 63.51 km/h | Best | |
| 59.76 km/h | -3.75 km/h | |
| 49.49 km/h | -14.02 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 22.1% (14.02 Km/H).
Comfort
1Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 7.5 Points | -1.50 Points | |
| 6.5 Points | -2.50 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 27.8% (2.5 Points).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Show full testing methodology
Score Weighting
Weights express the scoring priorities, not how much each discipline actually changed the finishing order. The size of the performance gaps matters too. Category weights contribute to the overall score. Within each category, discipline weights divide that category’s share. Published finishing positions also need to be read alongside the editorial verdict.
| Test | Within category | Share of overall score |
|---|---|---|
| Dry · 39% | ||
| Dry Braking | 46% | 17.94% |
| Dry Handling | 45% | 17.55% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 9% | 3.51% |
| Wet · 56% | ||
| Wet Braking | 37% | 20.72% |
| Wet Handling | 37% | 20.72% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 10% | 5.6% |
| Straight Aqua | 16% | 8.96% |
| Comfort · 5% | ||
| Subj. Comfort | 100% | 5% |
Our standard methods
The conditions above are recorded for this test. The descriptions below explain our standard procedures; measurement windows and run counts can vary by test.
Dry Braking
For dry braking, I drive the test vehicle at an entry speed of 110 km/h and apply full braking effort to a standstill with ABS active on clean, dry asphalt. I typically use an 100–5 km/h measurement window. My standard programme is five runs per tyre set where possible, although the sequence can extend to as many as fifteen runs if conditions and tyre category justify it. I analyse the full set of runs and discard statistical outliers before averaging. Reference tyres are run repeatedly throughout the session to correct for changing conditions.
Dry Handling
For dry handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible so I can assess the tyre's natural balance, transient response, and limit behaviour without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tyre set, depending on the circuit, tyre type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tyres so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable. For more track-focused products, I also do endurance testing, which is a set number of laps at race pace to determine tire wear patterns and heat resistance over longer driving.
Subj. Dry Handling
I also carry out a structured subjective handling assessment at the limit of adhesion on a dedicated dry handling circuit. I score steering precision, steering response, turn-in behaviour, mid-corner balance, corner-exit traction, breakaway characteristics, and overall confidence using a standardised 1–10 scale used consistently across my testing. The final assessment combines numeric scoring with written technical commentary. I complete familiarisation laps on the control tyre before evaluating each candidate.
Wet Braking
For wet braking, I drive the test vehicle at an entry speed of 88 km/h and apply full braking effort to a standstill with ABS active on an asphalt surface with a controlled water film. I typically use an 80–5 km/h measurement window to isolate tyre performance from variability in the initial brake application. My standard programme is eight runs per tyre set where possible, although the sequence can extend to as many as fifteen runs if conditions and tyre category justify it. I analyse the full set of runs and discard statistical outliers before averaging. To correct for changing conditions, I run reference tyres repeatedly throughout the session — in wet testing, typically every three candidate test sets.
Wet Handling
For wet handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit. I generally use specialist wet circuits with kerb-watering systems designed to maintain a consistent surface condition. ESC is disabled where possible so I can assess the tyre's natural balance, transient response, and limit behaviour without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tyre set, depending on the circuit, tyre type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tyres so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable.
Subj. Wet Handling
I also carry out a structured subjective handling assessment at the limit of adhesion on a dedicated wet handling circuit. I score steering precision, steering response, turn-in behaviour, mid-corner balance, aquaplaning resistance, breakaway characteristics, and overall confidence using a standardised 1–10 scale used consistently across my testing. The final assessment combines numeric scoring with written technical commentary. I complete familiarisation laps on the control tyre before evaluating each candidate.
Straight Aqua
To measure straight-line aquaplaning resistance, I drive one side of the vehicle through a water trough of controlled depth, typically around 7 mm, while the opposite side remains on dry pavement. I enter at a fixed speed and then accelerate progressively. I define aquaplaning onset as the point at which the wheel travelling through the water exceeds a specified slip threshold relative to the dry-side reference wheel. I usually perform four runs per tyre set and average the valid results.
Subj. Comfort
To assess comfort, I drive on a wide range of road surfaces (often dedicated comfort tracks at test facilities) at speeds from 50 to 120 km/h, including smooth motorway, coarse surfaces, expansion joints, broken pavement, and sharp-edged obstacles. I evaluate primary ride quality, secondary ride quality, impact harshness, seat-transmitted vibration, and the tyre's ability to absorb sharp inputs. Ratings are assigned on a 1–10 scale relative to the reference tyre.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test
225/40 R1814 tyres tested
2 of these 3 tyres tested again
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 / Michelin Pilot Sport 4 / Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test
245/35 R1910 tyres tested
2 of these 3 tyres tested again
Continental Sport Contact 6 / Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S / Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
The FASTEST Track Tyres In The World Tested
235/35 R194 tyres tested
Tested in the same size
