Menu

Nokian Nordman 7

The new, reliable and durable Nokian Nordman 7 and Nokian Nordman 7 SUV studded tyres utilise a unique stud technology that offers safe and comfortable winter driving. The carefully tried and tested technological solutions ensure that new Nokian Nordman tyres are a reliable choice for the varying Northern conditions in terms of safety as well as overall economy.

6.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
78%
Wet Grip
82%
Road Feedback
67%
Handling
80%
Wear
89%
Comfort
84%
Buy again
93%
Snow Grip
97%
Ice Grip
88%
7 Reviews
84% Average
75,200 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 6th)
Nokian Nordman 7

Nokian Nordman 7

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
6.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
90.3
1.5x / 3 tests
Ice
78.4
1.2x / 3 tests
Value
60
0.42x / 1 test
Wet
46
1.93x / 3 tests
Comfort
40
0.32x / 1 test
Dry
40
1.13x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
83.1
2 tests
Handling
64.6
4 tests
Braking
63.5
4 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 84.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.06
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Studded Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2020 205/60 R16 6/8 13 metrics
1
Tests
6th
Average
6th
Best
6th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
6th/8
Good performance on snow and ice, predictable behavior at the grip limit.
Poor braking performance and generally poor traction in the dry and wet, high fuel consumption, high noise.

Questions and Answers for the Nokian Nordman 7

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nokian Nordman 7. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nokian Nordman 7 Reviews

Given 81% while driving a Hyundai elantra (195/65 R15) on mostly motorways for 30,000 easy going miles
Have put close to 45,000kms on these tires in harsh Alberta winters with lots of snow and ice roads. First year of use on them was excellent. As the tires aged I noticed a decline in ice performance often spinning out and I'm not an aggressive driver - but is a non-studded tire so i can't completely fault it for that. Also did get stuck a few times in deep snow (4-5" deep) when trying to accelerate from a stop - my vehicle is FWD so it's not entirely the tires fault. Loose powder snow on the paved motorways though has been excellent for the life of the tire and no complaints. Longevity of the tires has been excellent as from new at just over 13/32" of tread I'm now just at 11/32 with regular rotations every 5000kms so no complaints on tread life. The long tread life is maybe from a harder rubber compound used which may explain the drop in ice performance as they aged. All in all no complaints of my purchase but will be looking at studded tires come my next set.
April 19, 2024
Given 74% while driving a Honda Insight G1 (165/65 R14) on mostly town for 15,000 average miles
I have been using these Nordman 7's for 4 years as dedicated winter tires for my 2000 Honda Insight Hybrid. This is a very unusual car, and driving it year round presents some challenges due to the narrow rear track relative to the front. It is easy for ruts or bumps in packed snow and ice to nudge the rear end out more than in a car with similar front and rear track widths. The car is also very lightweight, has a super short wheelbase and has very small diameter wheels at 14 inches. All of this conspires to make finding a good extreme condition, or Nordic, winter tire difficult but critical for winter driving. I tried the Nokian Nordman 7 and have found that their performance is excellent in the conditions they were intended for, cold temperatures and deep or packed snow and ice. I have yet to get stuck even when the snow is deeper than my front air dam, or the roads are covered in ice. The loud roar of the studs just reminds me that I have grip and am safer, so I don't mind it much. Sadly, I do not see this size for sale any longer, good thing they seem not to wear much!
April 5, 2024
Given 95% while driving a Jeep (225/55 R18) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
I live in Alaska, have always had a 4x4 until 2021. I opted for a small suv / 2x2 . These tires were amazing . I felt safe . Was able to stop on ice and snow . We had a lot more snow in 2022 than I ever remember having in the 26 yrs living here. It handled weel and I never got stuck on a snow berm or in a less than ideal parking lot . Great Tire . Will always opt for this brand of tire .
August 3, 2023

How would you rate the Nokian Nordman 7?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nokian Nordman 7 Reviews

Given 94% while driving a Mitsubishi Outlander (215/70 R16) on a combination of roads for 200 average miles
This is the first snowfall using this brand. After my french class in Laval, Quebec. The road is not plowed for about 5-10cm snow, the tire tread works perfectly on the snow with a mix of slush on some parts of the road. It really divides the snow/slush all the way!
November 10, 2025
Given 86% while driving a Opel Corsa D 1.4 (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 14,000 average miles
Not expensive, good balanced tyres. Drived on them enough to say - good tyres, I recommend them to all who’s driving in Scandinavian winter conditions. You will feel safe with them in snowfall with hard wind and on icy roads. Wear is amazing, after 3 winter seasons there was no lost studs, rest was like 7,6 mm. Little but noisy - but it’s okay because studs.
September 23, 2021
Given 82% while driving a Hyundai elantra (205/55 R16 H) on mostly motorways for 6,000 easy going miles
Very good tire for extreme winter condition. I bought this set of tire October 2018, and not a lot of wear (like new) after almost 10 000km. We had a rough winter in Canada this year. Lot of snow and ice and never had problem on roads or highways. The grip on ice is excellent, always felt safe with this tire.

I little bit noisy on dry surface, but it's a studded tire so it's normal.

I highly recommend this tire
April 23, 2019
Rate the Nokian Nordman 7