- Mazda NB MK2.5 Phoenix 150bhp
- 225/45 R17
- 4,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
Uniroyal RainSport 3 Owner Reviews
Review this tyreWhat owners say summarised from 263 reviews
Drivers generally report the Uniroyal RainSport 3 delivers standout wet-weather performance, with excellent aquaplaning resistance and strong wet braking/traction that boosts confidence in heavy rain. Many also find it good-to-very-good in the dry for normal road use and strong value for money, often with a comfortable ride. The most repeated downside is rapid wear, and a notable minority mention soft sidewalls that can reduce steering precision or feel unstable when pushed hard (especially on heavier or more powerful cars).
What owners mention most counted across 257 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 288 ratings
- Owner score 80%
- Wet Grip 92%
- Dry Grip 84%
- Comfort 83%
- Road Feedback 79%
- Handling 78%
- Wear 64%
Uniroyal RainSport 3 Reviews - Page 14
- Fiat Bravo
- 225/45 R17 W
- 5,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
- Peugeot 207 SW Outdoor
- 205/55 R16
- 12,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Easy Going
Pulled 600kg load of logs out of a field with mud up to the calipers.
Should be good for 25k miles which is a surprise for a 'sticky tyre.
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Uniroyal RainSport 3? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Ford mondeo 2.2
- 225/45 R17
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
I can stop as good in the wet as i can in the dry noise & comfort all good
Would definitely buy again
Also got them fitted to my sons ford fiesta
- Ford Mondeo Titanium 2.0 TCDI
- 235/40 R18 V
- 3,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Hyundai Coupe 2.0L
- 225/45 R17
- 10,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Volvo V70 D3
- 225/50 R17 W
- 10,800 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Easy Going
However, the biggest failing of these tyres, is their rate of wear. I am not a fast driver and seldom do I exceed the speed limit. I don't drive aggressively and I don't even turn the steering wheel while the car is stationary.
My car went for its service today and to my absolute astonishment, my garage suggested I might consider replacing my front tyres as there was only 2mm of tread thereon. I bought these tyres 12 months ago and have driven only 10,800 miles on them. So, bye bye Rainsport 3s.
Will I buy them again? NO WAY!
- Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 4 Door (2008)
- 215/45 R18
- 5,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
- Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 (Modified)
- 215/45 R18 W
- 4,500 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
The one big problem with these tyres however is lifespan. While I admit that I'm not the kindest to my tyres, I wasn't expecting the fronts to be down to 2.5-3mm after just 4500 miles, in a car only putting 143hp through the fronts. The rears are fairing better, with around 4.5-5mm left. The edges also wear much quicker, as the slightly squashy sidewalls mean you often end up rolling onto parts of the tyre not designed for use in high speed corners.
- Fiat Bravo
- 225/45 R17
- 3,100 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- BMW 330i M SPORT SALOON
- 225/45 R17
- 6,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
Wet grip is just outstanding, standing water is no drama, only thing that catches it out is grease but that's just a given.
Road feedback is ok but these are a soft tyre, so where you do feel some tyre roll and squash in hard dry corners this is made up for in comfort. IMO it's an acceptable compromise on a road car in the UK.
The way these tyres reach their limit and pass it brilliant and so predictable, very confidence inspiring, and also a poor influence on you tempted you to kick that back end out more and more!
Wear is what lets these tyres down sadly, fronts are fine plenty of life, but the tears have worn out after 6000 miles. These were hard miles with lots of launches and skids, but other tyres with similar treatment have faired much better, for the price however I am still very satisfied and don't feel out of pocket in the slightest.
As mentioned before comfort is brilliant soaking up bumps with ease, and as a side note absorbed a rather strong impact with a curb after some SnapBack on a greasy corner slide (driver error) with no bulging or tears and protected the wheel well.
I would definitely buy again, admittedly not for my next tyres alas I want to try something new purely for curiosity!!! Fitted to an e46 330i on ac schnitzer racing suspension in 225/45r17 front 245/40r17 rear on 8.5j wheels with et43 offset.
- Alfa Romeo
- 225/40 R18 W
- 3,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Despite his name "Sport" doesn't have much of sportiveness on the dry, because the side walls are soft, this makes the car understeer easily, compared with previous Falken Azenis 453, but in a really predictable way.
Really good traction.
On the wet is a monster, impressive traction and handling.
Only did 3k miles, wear seems ok. Noticed 1mm/2.5k miles wear on the FWD
The side rim protection is a joke.
Really good price/performance.
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tyre
All tyre testsThe latest Tyre Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tyres for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tyres Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 →
Summer Tyres
All Season Tyres
Winter Tyres
SUV and All Terrain Tyres
Track Tyres
Which tyres do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tyres.

