Menu

Test source ACE

2016 ACE Mid Range Summer Tyre Test

Overall test winnerNexen N Blue HD Plus

The first summer tyre test of 2016 is a curious one. ACE, the Automobile Club Europa, are often first to publish their regular summer tyre tests, but this year their first tyre test exclusively features midrange tyres.

Tyres tested
10
Tested size
195/65 R15

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

10 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2016 ACE Mid Range Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The first summer tyre test of 2016 is a curious one. ACE, the Automobile Club Europa, are often first to publish their regular summer tyre tests, but this year their first tyre test exclusively features midrange tyres.

Testing ten 195/65 R15 tyres on a VW Golf, ACE argue that the most important consideration for 90% of motorists is price, which is why they've chosen to tests tyres as cheap as 35/euros per tyre.

Sadly, ACE didn't include a reference premium tyre manufacturer to benchmark the performance of the midrange group, but did include Hankook and Nexen tyres, both companies now making excellent products, and winning OE approvals on premium car manufacturers such as BMW.

The Results

In the dry, the results were close. Dry performance is a relatively easy task for cheap tyre manufacturers to master, and of the ten tyres on test the Nexen N'Blue HD+ took the top spot, the Hankook Kinergy ECO K425 in second and the Sava Intensa HP and Pneumant Summer HP4 joint third.

In the wet the field spread was much wider. Wet performance is harder to master than dry performance, which was dramatically highlighted when the worst performing tyre, the GT Radial Champiro FE1 stopped the car more than 15 meters behind the test winning Nexen N'Blue HD+. The Hankook and Pneumant tyres which scored highly in the dry also scored strongly in the wet, taking the top three positions, with only the Barum Brillantis 2 in fifth having a much better time in the wet than it could manage in the dry.

All ten tyres were relatively close when looking at fuel efficiency and ride comfort, but this time the test-losing GT Radial scored best overall.

Finally, when looking at price, the test-winning Nexen and second placed Hankook were the most expensive tyres on test, reaffirming you largely get what you pay for with tyres. This is a view the ACE testers agreed with, noting the extra purchase price was more than justified for the higher performance of the tyres.

Full results below. Please note the "Misc" column is the combined rolling resistance, noise and comfort scores.

1st

Nexen N Blue HD+

195/65 R15
Nexen N Blue HD Plus
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry49
Wet63
Misc40

Total: 152

2nd

Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco

195/65 R15
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry46
Wet58
Misc42

Total: 146

3rd

Pneumant Summer HP4

195/65 R15
Pneumant Summer HP4
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry47
Wet60
Misc39

Total: 146

4th

Debica Presto

195/65 R15
Debica Presto
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry43
Wet48
Misc42

Total: 133

5th

BFGoodrich gGrip

195/65 R15
BFGoodrich gGrip
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry44
Wet46
Misc40

Total: 130

6th

Barum Brillantis 2

195/65 R15
Barum Brillantis 2
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry38
Wet53
Misc39

Total: 130

7th

Viking CityTech II

195/65 R15
Viking CityTech II
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry39
Wet50
Misc40

Total: 129

8th

Sava intensa hp

195/65 R15
Sava intensa hp
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry46
Wet40
Misc42

Total: 128

9th

High Performer HS3

195/65 R15
High Performer HS3
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry41
Wet36
Misc40

Total: 117

10th

GT Radial Champiro FE1

195/65 R15
GT Radial Champiro FE1
All discipline results (3)
TestResult
Dry41
Wet18
Misc45

Total: 104

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

5 comments
  1. Kolemjdouci archived

    Useful to add as a follow-up test review (repeated test of winner & 'loser'):
    Giti: Dekra independent results contradict magazine tyre test (http://www.tyrepress.com/20....

    #1942
  2. Kolemjdouci archived

    Useful to add as a follow-up test review (repeated test of winner & 'loser'):

    Giti: Dekra independent results contradict magazine tyre test (http://www.tyrepress.com/20....

    #1941
  3. Andy Holmes archived

    Yeah goid few omissions there, as you say benchmark premium tyre, but also where are two of the biggest mid-range players Falken and Kumho?? Avon too now i think...

    #1881
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.