Auto Express has returned to 205/55 R16 for its 2026 summer tyre test, three years after it last ran the size that remains the UK's biggest seller. Eight tyres were bought on the open market through an independent German wholesaler and tested at the Continental Contidrom near Hannover, using an Audi A3 across nine separate wet, dry, comfort and efficiency tests. Hankook, Vredestein, Kumho and Goodyear all turned down an invitation this year, citing new designs still to come.

The winner is the Falken Ziex ZE320, and it is the first time this pattern has taken an Auto Express title. It set the fastest lap on both the wet and the dry handling circuits and recorded the shortest dry braking distance, which covers the areas the magazine weights most heavily. The reigning champion, the Continental PremiumContact 7, finished second and kept hold of the single most important test in the programme, straight-line wet braking, where it stopped a clear margin shorter than anything else. Third went to the Firestone Roadhawk 2, a first-time entrant that won both aquaplaning tests and the cabin noise measurement.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking: 80 → 0 km/h

There are some notable results further down the order. The Michelin Primacy 5 recorded by far the lowest rolling resistance in the test and was third in wet braking, yet finished last around the dry handling circuit and seventh in wet handling. The Pirelli Cinturato C3 was second in both wet braking and wet handling but last of all in wet cornering, an anomaly against an otherwise strong wet showing. The Maxxis Premitra HP6 is the biggest improver, going from last of eleven in the 2023 test of this size to fourth of eight here. And the budget Dynamo Street-H MH01 finished last in six of the nine tests, including every one that matters in the wet.

A note on the numbers below. Auto Express do not publish raw measurements, only each tyre's result as a percentage of the best in that test, so the figures in these charts are built from estimated 'bests'. The percentage difference between the tyres is exact in every case; what is estimated is the absolute number the scale starts from. This test is better anchored than most: Auto Express state the winning wet braking distance of 25.1 metres outright, and the individual tyre reports quote enough absolute gaps to fix dry braking and both lap times to within a few tenths. Wet cornering, both aquaplaning tests, cabin noise and rolling resistance are genuine estimates. Because our scoring works on percentages this does not affect the score weighting calculator on the results tab, but it seemed important to share.

The full test, including Auto Express's own driver commentary on every tyre, is on the Auto Express website.

Dry

Dry braking was measured from 62mph to a standstill. The Falken stopped shortest, with the Continental and Pirelli both within a metre of it, and the budget Dynamo more than five metres adrift.

Dry Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Falken ZIEX ZE320	36 m	Best	0 km/h
2Continental PremiumContact 7	36.4 m	+0.40 m	14 km/h
3Pirelli Cinturato C3	36.6 m	+0.60 m	17 km/h
4Nokian Powerproof 2	37.4 m	+1.40 m	25 km/h
5Michelin Primacy 5	37.9 m	+1.90 m	29 km/h
6Maxxis Premitra HP6	38.3 m	+2.30 m	32 km/h
7Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	38.5 m	+2.50 m	33 km/h
8Dynamo STREET H MH01	41.2 m	+5.20 m	46 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.4% (5.2 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Dynamo STREET H MH01 would still be travelling at 46 km/h when the Falken ZIEX ZE320 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale they sit on is calculated from the absolute braking distances quoted in the Auto Express text.

The dry handling circuit is a one-mile course mixing slow traction corners with faster sweeps. The Falken led here too, with the Maxxis second, while the Michelin was last of all, six tenths of a second behind the pair tied for sixth.

Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Falken ZIEX ZE320	53.5 s	Best
2Maxxis Premitra HP6	53.71 s	+0.21 s
3Continental PremiumContact 7	53.99 s	+0.49 s
4Dynamo STREET H MH01	54.2 s	+0.70 s
4Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	54.2 s	+0.70 s
6Pirelli Cinturato C3	54.26 s	+0.76 s
6Nokian Powerproof 2	54.26 s	+0.76 s
8Michelin Primacy 5	54.87 s	+1.37 s

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale they sit on is calculated from the lap-time gaps quoted in the Auto Express text.

Wet

Straight-line wet braking from 50mph is the single most heavily weighted test in the programme, and the Continental won it clearly, stopping over a metre shorter than the second-placed Pirelli. The Falken's sixth place here is the one real blemish on its scorecard. The Dynamo needed around seven metres more than the Continental to stop.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Continental PremiumContact 7	25.1 m	Best	0 km/h
2Pirelli Cinturato C3	26.3 m	+1.20 m	28 km/h
3Michelin Primacy 5	26.9 m	+1.80 m	34 km/h
4Maxxis Premitra HP6	27.1 m	+2.00 m	35 km/h
5Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	27.2 m	+2.10 m	36 km/h
6Falken ZIEX ZE320	27.3 m	+2.20 m	37 km/h
7Nokian Powerproof 2	27.8 m	+2.70 m	41 km/h
8Dynamo STREET H MH01	32.2 m	+7.10 m	61 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 28.3% (7.1 m ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Dynamo STREET H MH01 would still be travelling at 61 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. This is the one test where they also state an absolute figure, so the scale is anchored on the 25.1 metres they quote for the winning Continental, and the gaps between the tyres are exact.

On the wet handling circuit the Falken was over half a second clear of the next tyre, with five mid-field tyres then covered by a single second. The Michelin was adrift of that group, and the Dynamo was some nine seconds off the pace.

Wet Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Falken ZIEX ZE320	88 s	Best
2Pirelli Cinturato C3	88.62 s	+0.62 s
3Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	88.71 s	+0.71 s
4Continental PremiumContact 7	88.89 s	+0.89 s
5Maxxis Premitra HP6	89.34 s	+1.34 s
6Nokian Powerproof 2	89.61 s	+1.61 s
7Michelin Primacy 5	90.72 s	+2.72 s
8Dynamo STREET H MH01	97.02 s	+9.02 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.3% (9.02 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale they sit on is calculated from the lap-time gaps quoted in the Auto Express text.

Wet cornering was timed on a 50-metre wetted circle. The Maxxis was quickest with the Continental alongside it, while the Nokian and Pirelli were a long way back.

Wet Circle
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Maxxis Premitra HP6	11.5 s	Best
2Continental PremiumContact 7	11.52 s	+0.02 s
3Falken ZIEX ZE320	11.66 s	+0.16 s
4Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	11.68 s	+0.18 s
5Michelin Primacy 5	11.93 s	+0.43 s
6Dynamo STREET H MH01	12.07 s	+0.57 s
7Nokian Powerproof 2	13.61 s	+2.11 s
8Pirelli Cinturato C3	13.76 s	+2.26 s

The difference between best and worst was 19.7% (2.26 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact, but the scale they sit on is our own estimate, so treat the absolute lap times as indicative only.

Straight-line aquaplaning measured the speed at which each tyre reached 15 per cent slip through 9mm of standing water. The Firestone and the Nokian were clear of the rest of the field.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	85 km/h	Best
2Nokian Powerproof 2	83.1 km/h	-1.90 km/h
3Falken ZIEX ZE320	78.3 km/h	-6.70 km/h
4Pirelli Cinturato C3	77.9 km/h	-7.10 km/h
4Michelin Primacy 5	77.9 km/h	-7.10 km/h
6Continental PremiumContact 7	76.9 km/h	-8.10 km/h
7Maxxis Premitra HP6	76 km/h	-9.00 km/h
8Dynamo STREET H MH01	73 km/h	-12.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.1% (12 Km/H).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact, but the scale they sit on is our own estimate, so treat the absolute speeds as indicative only.

Curved aquaplaning is the average residual lateral acceleration through a bend flooded with 5mm of water, driven between 40 and 60mph. The Firestone and Nokian led here as well, with the Maxxis and Dynamo well down the order.

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	3.8 m/sec2	Best
2Nokian Powerproof 2	3.75 m/sec2	-0.05 m/sec2
3Falken ZIEX ZE320	3.61 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2
4Pirelli Cinturato C3	3.44 m/sec2	-0.36 m/sec2
5Michelin Primacy 5	3.4 m/sec2	-0.40 m/sec2
6Continental PremiumContact 7	3.31 m/sec2	-0.49 m/sec2
7Maxxis Premitra HP6	3.06 m/sec2	-0.74 m/sec2
8Dynamo STREET H MH01	2.9 m/sec2	-0.90 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 23.7% (0.9 m/sec2).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact, but the scale they sit on is our own estimate, so treat the absolute figures as indicative only.

Comfort

Rather than use the drive-by figure printed on the EU label, Auto Express measure the noise heard inside the car across a mix of smooth and coarse surfaces at a set speed. The Firestone was quietest, the Continental next, and the Michelin and Nokian were tied at the back.

Noise
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	68 dB	Best
2Continental PremiumContact 7	68.4 dB	+0.40 dB
3Falken ZIEX ZE320	68.9 dB	+0.90 dB
4Dynamo STREET H MH01	69.1 dB	+1.10 dB
5Pirelli Cinturato C3	69.3 dB	+1.30 dB
6Maxxis Premitra HP6	69.7 dB	+1.70 dB
7Michelin Primacy 5	69.8 dB	+1.80 dB
7Nokian Powerproof 2	69.8 dB	+1.80 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact, but the scale they sit on is our own estimate, so treat the absolute decibel readings as indicative only.

Value

Rolling resistance was measured to the industry standard rather than read off the label, and the results do not always agree with it. The Michelin was some way clear of the field, while the Continental and Pirelli, both premium tyres, were beaten by the cheaper Maxxis and Firestone.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Michelin Primacy 5	7 kg/t	Best	£0
2Maxxis Premitra HP6	7.53 kg/t	+0.53 kg/t	£33
3Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN	7.87 kg/t	+0.87 kg/t	£55
4Falken ZIEX ZE320	8.05 kg/t	+1.05 kg/t	£66
5Nokian Powerproof 2	8.06 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t	£67
6Continental PremiumContact 7	8.43 kg/t	+1.43 kg/t	£90
7Pirelli Cinturato C3	8.61 kg/t	+1.61 kg/t	£101
8Dynamo STREET H MH01	9.37 kg/t	+2.37 kg/t	£149

The difference between best and worst was 33.9% (2.37 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Dynamo STREET H MH01 uses about 103 L (£149) more fuel than the Michelin Primacy 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Petrol/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

19,000 km

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

£1.45/L

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Three percentage points separate first from seventh, so this is a close, high-quality field in which the order is decided by small margins and no single tyre wins everything. The eighth tyre is the exception and the warning: the Dynamo saves a modest amount at the till and gives up a great deal of wet braking performance to do it.

Auto Express Test Winner

The Falken Ziex ZE320 is the outright winner of this test and a large step on from the Ziex tyres that carried a similar name before it. It leads the field in dry braking and on both handling circuits while staying near the front almost everywhere else, and only wet braking stops it being a clean sweep. For a tyre priced in the middle of this group that is a strong result, and it makes the Falken the pick for drivers who want one tyre that does everything well.

Dry100%

Wet96.1%

Comfort98.7%

Rolling Resistance87%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 8	36 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better	1^st / 8	53.5 s	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 8	27.3 m	+2.20 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	1^st / 8	88 s	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	3^rd / 8	11.66 s	+0.16 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 8	78.3 km/h	-6.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 8	3.61 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 8	68.9 dB	+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 8	8.05 kg/t	+1.05 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
Price: 79.99

The Continental PremiumContact 7 is beaten but not embarrassed, losing the overall win by the narrowest of margins while still owning the single most important test in the programme. It is the tyre to buy if wet braking is the thing you care about above all else, and its dry performance and refinement are close to the best here too. The aquaplaning results are the caveat, and they are the main reason a newer rival got past it.

Dry99%

Wet97.2%

Comfort99.4%

Rolling Resistance83%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 8	36.4 m	+0.40 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 8	53.99 s	+0.49 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 8	25.1 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better	4^th / 8	88.89 s	+0.89 s
Wet CircleLower is better	2^nd / 8	11.52 s	+0.02 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 8	76.9 km/h	-8.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 8	3.31 m/sec2	-0.49 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 8	68.4 dB	+0.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 8	8.43 kg/t	+1.43 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
Price: 106.99

The Firestone Roadhawk 2 takes third on debut and does it with a distinctive profile rather than by being merely competent everywhere. It is the tyre for standing water and for refinement, winning both aquaplaning tests and the noise measurement outright, and it holds up well in wet handling and efficiency. The dry braking result is the one that keeps it off the top step, so it suits drivers whose worst weather is heavy rain rather than those chasing outright dry stopping power.

Dry96.1%

Wet97.4%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance89%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 8	38.5 m	+2.50 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	4^th / 8	54.2 s	+0.70 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 8	27.2 m	+2.10 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 8	88.71 s	+0.71 s
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 8	11.68 s	+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 8	85 km/h	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 8	3.8 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 8	68 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 8	7.87 kg/t	+0.87 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/67
Price: 87.97

The Maxxis Premitra HP6 is one of the bigger stories of this test, moving from the back of the field to the edge of the podium in a single generation. Wet cornering, dry handling and efficiency are genuine strengths rather than respectable results, and the price makes the package harder still to argue with. Aquaplaning is the area that still needs work, and until it improves the Maxxis is best suited to drivers who do not routinely meet standing water at speed.

Dry96.8%

Wet94.4%

Comfort97.6%

Rolling Resistance93%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 8	38.3 m	+2.30 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 8	53.71 s	+0.21 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 8	27.1 m	+2.00 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	5^th / 8	89.34 s	+1.34 s
Wet CircleLower is better	1^st / 8	11.5 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 8	76 km/h	-9.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 8	3.06 m/sec2	-0.74 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 8	69.7 dB	+1.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 8	7.53 kg/t	+0.53 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/70
Price: 63.50

The Pirelli Cinturato C3 is a good tyre that finished mid-table because the field around it is strong, not because it lacks ability. Its wet braking and wet handling are close to the best available and it is the most communicative tyre in this group, which will matter to keen drivers. The wet cornering result is a real anomaly, and combined with high rolling resistance and the highest price, it is a harder tyre to recommend on value than on ability.

Dry98.5%

Wet92.4%

Comfort98.1%

Rolling Resistance81.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 8	36.6 m	+0.60 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	6^th / 8	54.26 s	+0.76 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 8	26.3 m	+1.20 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 8	88.62 s	+0.62 s
Wet CircleLower is better	8^th / 8	13.76 s	+2.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 8	77.9 km/h	-7.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 8	3.44 m/sec2	-0.36 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 8	69.3 dB	+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 8	8.61 kg/t	+1.61 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/70
Price: 124.58

The Michelin Primacy 5 is a specialist rather than an all-rounder in this company. Its efficiency advantage is large enough to be worth real money over a set's life, and its wet braking is genuinely competitive, but both handling circuits expose it against a strong field. Buy it for the running costs and the wet stopping distance; look elsewhere if you want a tyre that rewards being driven hard.

Dry96.2%

Wet94.5%

Comfort97.4%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 8	37.9 m	+1.90 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	8^th / 8	54.87 s	+1.37 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 8	26.9 m	+1.80 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	7^th / 8	90.72 s	+2.72 s
Wet CircleLower is better	5^th / 8	11.93 s	+0.43 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 8	77.9 km/h	-7.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 8	3.4 m/sec2	-0.40 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 8	69.8 dB	+1.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 8	7 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: B/A/70
Price: 107.99

The Nokian Powerproof 2 is a competent return rather than a triumphant one. Its deep-water performance is a genuine strength and it is respectable in the dry, but wet braking and wet cornering are the two areas Auto Express weights most heavily and it gave away ground in both. There is a good tyre here for drivers in consistently wet climates, but it needs more outright wet grip before it can trouble the front of a field this competitive.

Dry97.4%

Wet92.6%

Comfort97.4%

Rolling Resistance86.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 8	37.4 m	+1.40 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	6^th / 8	54.26 s	+0.76 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 8	27.8 m	+2.70 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	6^th / 8	89.61 s	+1.61 s
Wet CircleLower is better	7^th / 8	13.61 s	+2.11 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 8	83.1 km/h	-1.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 8	3.75 m/sec2	-0.05 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 8	69.8 dB	+1.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 8	8.06 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t

EU Label: B/A/70
Price: 68.74

The Dynamo Street-H MH01 is included here as a reference point and it makes the case against budget tyres more effectively than any argument could. The saving over the next cheapest tyre in this test is small, and what it buys is a large loss of wet braking performance, wet grip and efficiency. Several tyres in this group cost only a little more and are far better in almost every area, and on a wet road that difference is measured in stopping distance rather than in comfort.

Dry93%

Wet86.5%

Comfort98.4%

Rolling Resistance74.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 8	41.2 m	+5.20 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	4^th / 8	54.2 s	+0.70 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 8	32.2 m	+7.10 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	8^th / 8	97.02 s	+9.02 s
Wet CircleLower is better	6^th / 8	12.07 s	+0.57 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 8	73 km/h	-12.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8^th / 8	2.9 m/sec2	-0.90 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 8	69.1 dB	+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 8	9.37 kg/t	+2.37 kg/t

EU Label: D/C/71
Price: 53.77

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test