Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Laufenn I Fit+
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 finished ahead 6 times and the I Fit+ not once, with one level. The Blizzak LM005 was stronger in wet, snow and value, the I Fit+ in comfort.
Performance profile
13 measurements from the 7 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Blizzak LM005
I Fit+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 1 measurement recorded in only one shared test is left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Blizzak LM005
I Fit+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Blizzak LM005
Not ahead in any category
I Fit+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Blizzak LM005 72% from 116 reviews and the I Fit+ 91% from 4. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Blizzak LM005 | Gap | I Fit+ | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 45.7 | 1.7% | 44.9 | 1-2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 120 | 1.5% | 118.5 | 2-1 |
| Wet Blizzak LM005 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 40.07 | 11.9% | 45.5 | 6-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 77.87 | 5.4% | 73.87 | 3-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.5 | 3.3% | 12.93 | 2-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 87.5 | 7% | 82.07 | 3-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.88 | 39.8% | 2.06 | 2-0 |
| Snow Blizzak LM005 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 27.68 | 1.2% | 28 | 5-1 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,903 | 2.7% | 2,827 | 2-1 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 58.53 | 0.6% | 58.83 | 1-2 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.03 | 8.9% | 3.3 | 0-1 |
| Comfort I Fit+ ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 71.47 | 0.1 dB | 71.33 | 1-2 |
| Value Blizzak LM005 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 35,300 | 3.4% | 36,676 | 2-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.87 | 4.6% | 8.27 | 2-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 7 tests, 2020 to 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Blizzak LM005 | Field | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P10 of 20 | P13 of 20 | |
| 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test | P1 of 54 | P10 of 54 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P5 of 20 | P20 of 20 | |
| 2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tyre Test | P7 of 16 | P7 of 16 | |
| 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P1 of 50 | P10 of 50 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 20 | P16 of 20 | |
| 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | P1 of 51 | P19 of 51 |
Blizzak LM005 vs I Fit+: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 or the Laufenn I Fit+ the better tyre?
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 finished ahead 6 times and the I Fit+ not once, with one level. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Blizzak LM005 scores 8.9 and the I Fit+ 8.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Blizzak LM005 or the I Fit+?
The Blizzak LM005 led 16 of the 16 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 11.9% shorter in the wet across 6 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 3-3 between the Blizzak LM005 and the I Fit+.
Which is better in snow?
The Blizzak LM005 led 8 of the 13 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.2% shorter on snow across 6 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Blizzak LM005 lasted 3.4% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) and had 4.6% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 5.9/10 for the Blizzak LM005 and 8.3/10 for the I Fit+.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.4/10 for the Blizzak LM005 and 9/10 for the I Fit+.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Blizzak LM005 72% from 116 reviews and the I Fit+ 91% from 4.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Blizzak LM005 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 36.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Blizzak LM005 is made in 165 sizes (14 to 22 inch) and the I Fit+ in 62 (13 to 19 inch). 53 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Blizzak LM005 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the I Fit+ C and D.
Which is the newer tyre?
The I Fit+ is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Blizzak LM005 in 2019. The Blizzak LM005 replaced the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
4-6 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8-5 in 14 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
5-10 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
5-4 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
8-10 in 18 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Alpin 6
15-9 in 24 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5
16-7 in 23 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
22-8 in 31 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.