Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin CrossClimate+ finished ahead 8 times and the Kinergy 4S2 5 times. The CrossClimate+ was stronger in dry and value, the Kinergy 4S2 in wet, snow and comfort.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 13 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
CrossClimate+
Kinergy 4S2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 11 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
CrossClimate+
Kinergy 4S2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
CrossClimate+
Kinergy 4S2
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the CrossClimate+ 83% from 120 reviews and the Kinergy 4S2 75% from 72. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | CrossClimate+ | Gap | Kinergy 4S2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry CrossClimate+ ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking - Cool m | 39.8 | 4% | 38.2 | 0-1 |
| Dry Braking m | 39.4 | 4.2% | 41.13 | 8-0 |
| Dry Handling - Cool s | 76.9 | 0.1% | 77 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 85.17 | 0.5% | 85.58 | 2-0 |
| Dry Handling (km/h) | 96.3 | 0.4% | 95.98 | 2-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 8% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Kinergy 4S2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 49.1 | 1.1% | 48.61 | 3-5 |
| Wet Braking - Cool m | 56.3 | 11.5% | 63.6 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling - Cool s | 90.6 | 4% | 94.4 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 70.06 | 2.3% | 68.49 | 0-2 |
| Wet Handling (km/h) | 70.63 | 0.8% | 71.13 | 2-2 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 74.78 | 5.5% | 78.94 | 0-6 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 1.8 | 19.4% | 2.15 | 0-1 |
| Snow Kinergy 4S2 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 27.51 | 1.9% | 27.01 | 1-5 |
| Snow Traction s | 22.74 | 5.9% | 24.17 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,782 | 0.3% | 2,777 | 1-1 |
| Snow Handling s | 56.96 | 1.9% | 55.96 | 0-2 |
| Snow Handling (km/h) | 49.38 | 0.2% | 49.48 | 1-3 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | 2.9% | scored | 0-1 |
| Comfort Kinergy 4S2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 8.9% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 68.73 | 0.1 dB | 68.63 | 3-3 |
| Rough Noise dB | 68.4 | 1.3 dB | 67.1 | 0-1 |
| Value CrossClimate+ ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 66,603 | 55.3% | 43,368 | 3-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.47 | 2.4% | 8.68 | 4-2 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 13 tests, 2018 to 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | CrossClimate+ | Field | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test | P4 of 9 | P5 of 9 | |
| 2020 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | P4 of 6 | P3 of 6 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | P5 of 11 | P1 of 11 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P4 of 14 | P7 of 14 | |
| 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test | P5 of 32 | P3 of 32 | |
| 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | P5 of 9 | P2 of 9 | |
| 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P1 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2019 ACE GTU All Season Tyre Test | P6 of 8 | P5 of 8 | |
| 2019 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | P3 of 11 | P7 of 11 | |
| 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview | P2 of 31 | P8 of 31 | |
| 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P4 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2018 27 All Season Tyre Shootout | P2 of 27 | P4 of 27 | |
| 7 of the best all season tyres | P1 of 10 | P5 of 10 |
CrossClimate+ vs Kinergy 4S2: your questions
Is the Michelin CrossClimate+ or the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 the better tyre?
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin CrossClimate+ finished ahead 8 times and the Kinergy 4S2 5 times. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate+ scores 9.4 and the Kinergy 4S2 8.9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the CrossClimate+ or the Kinergy 4S2?
The Kinergy 4S2 led 16 of the 24 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it resisted straight aquaplaning at a 5.5% higher speed across 6 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate+ led 14 of the 17 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.2% shorter in the dry across 8 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Kinergy 4S2 led 12 of the 16 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.9% shorter on snow across 6 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The CrossClimate+ lasted 55.3% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) and had 2.4% lower rolling resistance (6 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the CrossClimate+ and 7.6/10 for the Kinergy 4S2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.6/10 for the CrossClimate+ and 7.3/10 for the Kinergy 4S2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the CrossClimate+ 83% from 120 reviews and the Kinergy 4S2 75% from 72. 87% of CrossClimate+ owners would buy it again, against 74% for the Kinergy 4S2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 6 tests that listed prices, the CrossClimate+ was the dearer tyre in 6 of them, by 29.6% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The CrossClimate+ is made in 63 sizes (13 to 19 inch) and the Kinergy 4S2 in 96 (14 to 20 inch). 54 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the CrossClimate+ is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Kinergy 4S2 B and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
6-9 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
15-10 in 25 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8-3 in 13 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-8 in 19 shared tests
Every Michelin vs Hankook test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.