Menu

GT-Radial FE2 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

3 tyres compared 6 shared tests Summer
GT-Radial FE2
GT-Radial FE2
Summer · Ultra High Performance
Tyre Reviews7.8
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
6
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Summer · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
3
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Summer · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews8.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
3
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses

Adjust Category Weighting

Adjust the importance of each performance category to see how different priorities affect the overall ranking across all shared tests.

Dry 35%
Wet 50%
Comfort 5%
Value 10%
Dry 35% · Wet 50% · Comfort 5% · Value 10%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Comfort
Value
RankTyreScoreDryWetComfortValue
1Hankook Ventus Prime 499%99.4%99.3%99.2%96.6%
2Kumho Ecsta HS5298.4%99.9%98.2%97.2%95.2%
3GT-Radial FE295.9%97.3%95.5%99.7%91.2%

Category Breakdown

Detailed Breakdowns

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Tyre Weight [Kg] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test-by-Test Win/Draw/Loss Record
RankTyreWinsDrawsLosses
1Kumho Ecsta HS52303
2Hankook Ventus Prime 4303
3GT-Radial FE2006
Tests Included in This Comparison