Nokian Hakka Blue 3 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6
Ahead in each discipline
The Nokian Hakka Blue 3 and the Bridgestone Turanza 6 have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. The Hakka Blue 3 was stronger in dry and wet, the Turanza 6 in comfort.
Performance profile
6 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Hakka Blue 3
Turanza 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Hakka Blue 3
Turanza 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Hakka Blue 3 | Gap | Turanza 6 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Hakka Blue 3 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 38.85 | 2.6% | 39.85 | 2-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 16.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Hakka Blue 3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 35.05 | 1.4% | 35.55 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling s | 74.85 | 1.4% | 75.9 | 2-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 11.4 | 0.7% | 11.48 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 81.25 | 1.9% | 79.75 | 2-0 |
| Comfort Turanza 6 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | 4.2% | scored | 1-1 |
| Rough Noise dB | 73.7 | 0.2 dB | 73.5 | 0-1 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.95 | 4.4% | 7.6 | 0-1 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.35 | 0.9% | 5.4 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2025 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Hakka Blue 3 | Field | Turanza 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | P3 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | P5 of 14 | P4 of 14 |
Hakka Blue 3 vs Turanza 6: your questions
Is the Nokian Hakka Blue 3 or the Bridgestone Turanza 6 the better tyre?
The Nokian Hakka Blue 3 and the Bridgestone Turanza 6 have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Hakka Blue 3 scores 9.1 and the Turanza 6 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Hakka Blue 3 or the Turanza 6?
The Hakka Blue 3 led 7 of the 8 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.4% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Hakka Blue 3 led 2 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.6% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews; the Hakka Blue 3 has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Hakka Blue 3 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 30.5% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Hakka Blue 3 is made in 19 sizes (15 to 17 inch) and the Turanza 6 in 148 (15 to 22 inch). 15 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Hakka Blue 3 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Turanza 6 A and B.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Continental PremiumContact 7
0-14 in 14 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
1-4 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Vredestein Ultrac
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Falken Azenis FK520
2-2 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.