Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Paxaro Inverno
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 2 times and the Inverno not once. The Krisalp HP3 was stronger in wet, snow and comfort.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Krisalp HP3
Inverno
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Krisalp HP3
Inverno
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Krisalp HP3 | Gap | Inverno | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 45.6 | 0.4% | 45.8 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 110.2 | 1% | 111.3 | 0-1 |
| Wet Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 45 | 1.9% | 45.85 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 81.7 | 0.2% | 81.9 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.72 | 0.6% | 12.8 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 94.7 | 2.8% | 92.1 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.34 | 7.3% | 2.18 | 1-0 |
| Snow Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 29.3 | 3.6% | 30.4 | 2-0 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,861 | 4.5% | 2,737 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 59.9 | 4.2% | 57.5 | 1-0 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.38 | 11.9% | 3.02 | 1-0 |
| Comfort Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 70.8 | 0.9 dB | 71.7 | 1-0 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Wear km | 33,916 | 4.8% | 35,549 | 0-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.43 | 2.5% | 8.65 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Krisalp HP3 | Field | Inverno |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P11 of 20 | P14 of 20 | |
| 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test | P4 of 54 | P12 of 54 |
Krisalp HP3 vs Inverno: your questions
Is the Kleber Krisalp HP3 or the Paxaro Inverno the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 2 times and the Inverno not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Krisalp HP3 scores 8.1 and the Inverno 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Krisalp HP3 or the Inverno?
The Krisalp HP3 led 5 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.9% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the Krisalp HP3 and the Inverno.
Which is better in snow?
The Krisalp HP3 led 5 of the 5 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.6% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36 reviews; the Inverno has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Krisalp HP3 is made in 75 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the Inverno in 5 (16 to 18 inch). 5 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Krisalp HP3 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Inverno C and D.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Inverno is the newer design: it reached the market in 2019, the Krisalp HP3 in 2016. The Krisalp HP3 replaced the Kleber Krisalp HP2.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Barum Polaris 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
2-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-10 in 15 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
13-5 in 20 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
4-18 in 22 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
8-1 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.