Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Zeetex WH 1000
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 3 times and the WH 1000 not once. The Krisalp HP3 was stronger in wet.
Performance profile
Their shared tests recorded too few of the same measurements to chart, so the chart starts from each tyre's Tyre Reviews Score categories: its whole record, not shared tests.
Where each scores higher
Krisalp HP3
WH 1000
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Krisalp HP3 | Gap | WH 1000 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 35.93 | 11.6% | 40.67 | 3-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2020 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Krisalp HP3 | Field | WH 1000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | P16 of 55 | P42 of 55 | |
| 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P11 of 50 | P40 of 50 | |
| 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | P8 of 51 | P36 of 51 |
Krisalp HP3 vs WH 1000: your questions
Is the Kleber Krisalp HP3 or the Zeetex WH 1000 the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 3 times and the WH 1000 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Krisalp HP3 scores 8.1 and the WH 1000 3.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Krisalp HP3 or the WH 1000?
The Krisalp HP3 led 3 of the 3 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 11.6% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36 reviews; the WH 1000 has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Krisalp HP3 is made in 75 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the WH 1000 in 43 (16 to 19 inch). 35 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Krisalp HP3 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the WH 1000 B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The WH 1000 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2017, the Krisalp HP3 in 2016. The Krisalp HP3 replaced the Kleber Krisalp HP2.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

