Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs Giti GitiSportS2
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 finished ahead 5 times and the GitiSportS2 once, with one level. The N Fera Sport SU2 was stronger in dry, comfort and value.
Performance profile
10 measurements from the 7 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
N Fera Sport SU2
GitiSportS2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
N Fera Sport SU2
GitiSportS2
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
N Fera Sport SU2
GitiSportS2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18 reviews and the GitiSportS2 78% from 19. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | N Fera Sport SU2 | Gap | GitiSportS2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry N Fera Sport SU2 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 34.94 | 3.1% | 36.09 | 7-0 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 101 | 0.1% | 101.1 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (km/h) | 110.2 | 1.3% | 111.6 | 1-2 |
| Wet Level | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 35.47 | 3.4% | 36.74 | 5-0 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 38.5 | 13.3% | 44.4 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 69.2 | 1.7% | 70.4 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (km/h) | 76.23 | 0.2% | 76.17 | 2-1 |
| Wet Circle (m/s) | 8.28 | 2.2% | 8.46 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle (s) | 14.5 | 2.1% | 14.8 | 2-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 84.08 | 3.7% | 87.28 | 0-5 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.06 | 17% | 3.58 | 0-4 |
| Comfort N Fera Sport SU2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 16.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 70.78 | 0.6 dB | 71.36 | 4-1 |
| Value N Fera Sport SU2 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 37,627 | 16.5% | 32,227 | 3-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.75 | 1.9% | 8.58 | 1-2 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.6 | 1.8% | 5.5 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 74.7 | 23.5% | 97.7 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 7 tests, 2023 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | N Fera Sport SU2 | Field | GitiSportS2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | P14 of 20 | P17 of 20 | |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | P10 of 18 | P15 of 18 | |
| 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | P16 of 52 | P17 of 52 | |
| 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | P11 of 11 | P10 of 11 | |
| 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | P17 of 20 | P17 of 20 | |
| 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test | P7 of 10 | P9 of 10 | |
| 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P14 of 50 | P19 of 50 |
N Fera Sport SU2 vs GitiSportS2: your questions
Is the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 or the Giti GitiSportS2 the better tyre?
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 finished ahead 5 times and the GitiSportS2 once, with one level. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the N Fera Sport SU2 scores 8.4 and the GitiSportS2 8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the N Fera Sport SU2 or the GitiSportS2?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 11-11 between the N Fera Sport SU2 and the GitiSportS2.
Which is better in the dry?
The N Fera Sport SU2 led 9 of the 11 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.1% shorter in the dry across 7 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The N Fera Sport SU2 lasted 16.5% longer in the wear tests (3 tests); the GitiSportS2 had 1.9% lower rolling resistance (4 tests). Owners rate wear 5.6/10 for the N Fera Sport SU2 and 8.4/10 for the GitiSportS2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The N Fera Sport SU2 was 0.6 dB quieter (5 tests). Owners rate comfort 6.4/10 for the N Fera Sport SU2 and 8/10 for the GitiSportS2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18 reviews and the GitiSportS2 78% from 19. 38% of N Fera Sport SU2 owners would buy it again, against 72% for the GitiSportS2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 5 tests that listed prices, the GitiSportS2 was the dearer tyre in 5 of them, by 16.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The N Fera Sport SU2 is made in 138 sizes (16 to 22 inch) and the GitiSportS2 in 64 (16 to 22 inch). 53 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the N Fera Sport SU2 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the GitiSportS2 A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
8-1 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs
Giti GitiSportS2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
0-9 in 9 shared tests
vs
Giti GitiSportS2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
4-1 in 5 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.