Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 finished ahead 3 times and the Quadraxer 3 not once, with one level. The Quadraxer 3 was stronger in snow and value, the 4 SeasonDrive X5 in dry, wet and comfort.
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Quadraxer 3
4 SeasonDrive X5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 1 measurement recorded in only one shared test is left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Quadraxer 3
4 SeasonDrive X5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Quadraxer 3 | Gap | 4 SeasonDrive X5 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry 4 SeasonDrive X5 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 38.68 | 3% | 37.5 | 0-4 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 95.43 | 1.1% | 96.53 | 0-3 |
| Wet 4 SeasonDrive X5 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 51.6 | 4.3% | 49.25 | 0-4 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 72.23 | 2.8% | 74.33 | 0-3 |
| Wet Circle s | 13.44 | 1.1% | 13.28 | 1-2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 75.87 | 4.2% | 72.97 | 2-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.77 | 4.5% | 2.67 | 2-1 |
| Snow Quadraxer 3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 24.83 | 5.3% | 26.27 | 2-1 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,777 | 5.3% | 2,642 | 3-0 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 70.67 | 3.1% | 68.4 | 3-0 |
| Snow Circle ms/2 | 3.72 | 1.9% | 3.65 | 1-0 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.05 | 0.2% | 3.08 | 1-1 |
| Comfort 4 SeasonDrive X5 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 4.9% | scored | 0-2 |
| Noise dB | 71.97 | 0.4 dB | 72.4 | 2-1 |
| Value Quadraxer 3 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 54,375 | 8.4% | 59,075 | 0-2 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.79 | 4.3% | 8.19 | 2-0 |
| Abrasion g | 570.5 | 18.6% | 682 | 2-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2025 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Quadraxer 3 | Field | 4 SeasonDrive X5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P7 of 15 | P7 of 15 | |
| 2026 All Season Tyre Braking Test - 30 Sets | P13 of 30 | P4 of 30 | |
| 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test | P8 of 11 | P3 of 11 | |
| 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | P9 of 15 | P8 of 15 |
Quadraxer 3 vs 4 SeasonDrive X5: your questions
Is the Kleber Quadraxer 3 or the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 the better tyre?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 finished ahead 3 times and the Quadraxer 3 not once, with one level. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Quadraxer 3 scores 9.4 and the 4 SeasonDrive X5 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Quadraxer 3 or the 4 SeasonDrive X5?
The 4 SeasonDrive X5 led 11 of the 16 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.3% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The 4 SeasonDrive X5 led 7 of the 7 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Quadraxer 3 led 10 of the 12 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.3% shorter on snow across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Quadraxer 3 had 4.3% lower rolling resistance (3 tests); the 4 SeasonDrive X5 lasted 8.4% longer in the wear tests (2 tests).
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9.1/10 for the Quadraxer 3 and 8/10 for the 4 SeasonDrive X5.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Quadraxer 3 86% from 32 reviews and the 4 SeasonDrive X5 87% from 1.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Quadraxer 3 was the dearer tyre in 3 of them, by 34% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-9 in 10 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
0-10 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
7-2 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
10-2 in 12 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
12-1 in 13 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.