Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Roadhog RGAS02
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 finished ahead 2 times and the RGAS02 not once. The Quadraxer 3 was stronger in wet, snow, comfort and value, the RGAS02 in dry.
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Quadraxer 3
RGAS02
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 80%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Quadraxer 3
RGAS02
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Quadraxer 3 | Gap | RGAS02 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry RGAS02 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 39.3 | 2% | 38.5 | 0-2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 99 | 0.3% | 99.3 | 0-1 |
| Wet Quadraxer 3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 47.9 | 8.9% | 52.6 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 70.2 | 2.5% | 68.5 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.57 | 1.5% | 12.76 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 76.3 | 16.5% | 65.5 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.9 | 40.1% | 2.07 | 1-0 |
| Snow Quadraxer 3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 25.3 | 5.2% | 26.7 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,878 | 17.8% | 2,444 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 53.6 | 7.6% | 49.8 | 1-0 |
| Snow Circle ms/2 | 3.72 | 12.7% | 3.3 | 1-0 |
| Comfort Quadraxer 3 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 72.5 | 2 dB | 74.5 | 1-0 |
| Value Quadraxer 3 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 50,750 | 17.9% | 43,050 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.77 | 11.2% | 8.75 | 1-0 |
| Abrasion g | 903 | 25.5% | 1,212 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Quadraxer 3 | Field | RGAS02 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | P9 of 15 | P15 of 15 | |
| 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | P8 of 30 | P13 of 30 |
Quadraxer 3 vs RGAS02: your questions
Is the Kleber Quadraxer 3 or the Roadhog RGAS02 the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 finished ahead 2 times and the RGAS02 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Quadraxer 3 scores 9.4 and the RGAS02 7.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Quadraxer 3 or the RGAS02?
The Quadraxer 3 led 6 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 8.9% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The RGAS02 led 3 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Quadraxer 3 led 4 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Quadraxer 3 86% from 32 reviews; the RGAS02 has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Quadraxer 3 is made in 72 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the RGAS02 in 61 (14 to 19 inch). 49 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Quadraxer 3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the RGAS02 B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The RGAS02 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the Quadraxer 3 in 2022. The Quadraxer 3 replaced the Kleber Quadraxer 2.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-9 in 10 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
0-10 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
7-2 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
10-2 in 12 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
12-1 in 13 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.