Firestone Roadhawk vs Bridgestone Turanza 6
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 finished ahead 3 times and the Roadhawk not once. The Roadhawk was stronger in dry, the Turanza 6 in wet and comfort.
Performance profile
10 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Roadhawk
Turanza 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Roadhawk
Turanza 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Roadhawk
Not ahead in any category
Turanza 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Roadhawk 67% from 46 reviews and the Turanza 6 76% from 75. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Roadhawk | Gap | Turanza 6 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Roadhawk ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 36.4 | 0.3% | 36.5 | 2-1 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 115.7 | 0.9% | 114.7 | 1-0 |
| Wet Turanza 6 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 34.83 | 5.5% | 33.03 | 0-3 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 75.6 | 1.2% | 74.7 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle m/sec2 | 6.21 | 1.3% | 6.29 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 84.7 | 0.2% | 84.5 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 4.72 | 10.8% | 4.26 | 1-0 |
| Comfort Turanza 6 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 74.5 | 0.4 dB | 74.1 | 0-1 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Wear km | 29,850 | 15.2% | 34,400 | 0-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.67 | 3.9% | 7.98 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2023 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Roadhawk | Field | Turanza 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | P6 of 20 | P3 of 20 | |
| 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P12 of 55 | P10 of 55 | |
| 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P31 of 50 | P16 of 50 |
Roadhawk vs Turanza 6: your questions
Is the Firestone Roadhawk or the Bridgestone Turanza 6 the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 finished ahead 3 times and the Roadhawk not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Roadhawk scores 8 and the Turanza 6 8.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Roadhawk or the Turanza 6?
The Turanza 6 led 4 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.5% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Roadhawk led 3 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. It averaged a 0.9% higher speed on the dry handling course in the one shared test that measured it.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Roadhawk had 3.9% lower rolling resistance (1 test); the Turanza 6 lasted 15.2% longer in the wear test (1 test). Owners rate wear 5.6/10 for the Roadhawk and 7.2/10 for the Turanza 6.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.1/10 for the Roadhawk and 7.7/10 for the Turanza 6.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Roadhawk 67% from 46 reviews and the Turanza 6 76% from 75. 41% of Roadhawk owners would buy it again, against 63% for the Turanza 6.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Roadhawk is made in 116 sizes (15 to 21 inch) and the Turanza 6 in 149 (7 to 22 inch). 85 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Roadhawk is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Turanza 6 A and B.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Turanza 6 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Roadhawk in 2017. The Turanza 6 replaced the Bridgestone Turanza T005.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Continental PremiumContact 7
0-16 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
3-6 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
1-4 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Vredestein Ultrac
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Falken Azenis FK520
2-2 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.