Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 79% · 44
- TR Score
- 8.3/10
- Owners say
- 67% · 6
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 finished ahead 5 times and the Solus 4S HA32+ not once. The Turanza All Season 6 stopped 9% shorter in the wet; the Solus 4S HA32+ was 1 dB quieter.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 if you prioritize maximum braking performance and strong aquaplaning resistance-especially for higher speeds, frequent rain, and higher-mileage driving. Choose the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus if upfront price, comfort/quietness, and generally safe (but not class-leading) handling are your priorities, and you're willing to accept weaker emergency braking and standing-water safety margins.
Where the Turanza All Season 6 is stronger
- Consistently shorter dry braking in every shared test (e.g., 36.8 m vs 42.5 m in AutoBild 2024; 37.7 m vs 41.5 m in 2026)
- Stronger wet braking across the board, often by a decisive margin (e.g., 50.5 m vs 57.9 m in AutoBild 2024)
- Clearly better aquaplaning resistance (higher straight-aqua speeds and much higher curved-aqua lateral grip in 2023-2026 results)
Where the Solus 4S HA32+ is stronger
- Comfort 4/5 Was 1 dB quieter (2 tests)
The measured tallies (wins out of measurements in the shared tests) come straight from the tables below. The written verdict and bullet points are analysis of those tests and of owner reviews; where they and the figures disagree, the figures are right.
Turanza All Season 6 vs Solus 4S HA32+ at a glance
| Category | Turanza All Season 6 | Gap | Solus 4S HA32+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won5 shared tests | 5 | 0 | |
| Dry8 measurements | 8 | The Turanza All Season 6 stopped 10% shorter in the dry (5 tests) | 0 |
| Wet16 measurements | 13 | The Turanza All Season 6 stopped 9% shorter in the wet (5 tests) | 2 |
| Snow11 measurements | 6 | The Turanza All Season 6 stopped 1.5% shorter on snow (3 tests) | 4 |
| Comfort5 measurements | 1 | The Solus 4S HA32+ was 1 dB quieter (2 tests) | 4 |
| Value8 measurements | 7 | The Turanza All Season 6 lasted 18% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) | 1 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The Turanza All Season 6 by 1.1 | 8.3/10 |
| Owner rating44 and 6 reviews | 79% | The Turanza All Season 6 by 12 points | 67% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 76% | The Turanza All Season 6 by 9 points | 67% |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | +34.8% | The Turanza All Season 6 was dearer in 3 of 3 | Cheaper |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Turanza All Season 6 | Field | Solus 4S HA32+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | P5 of 9 | P9 of 9 | |
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | P12 of 15 | P13 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview | P1 of 37 | P15 of 37 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P3 of 16 | P10 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout | P1 of 35 | P15 of 35 |
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Turanza All Season 6
Solus 4S HA32+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Turanza All Season 6
Solus 4S HA32+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Turanza All Season 6
Solus 4S HA32+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Turanza All Season 6 79% from 44 reviews and the Solus 4S HA32+ 67% from 6. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Turanza All Season 6 | Gap | Solus 4S HA32+ | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.66 | 10% | 41.86 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 92.4 | 0.5% | 91.9 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.5% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.44 | 9% | 49.34 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 74.5 | 1.4% | 73.5 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.66 | 1.8% | 11.87 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.87 | 9.2% | 74.07 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 24.8% | 2.41 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25.4 | 1.5% | 25 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,437 | 0.5% | 2,456 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 54.75 | 0.6% | 54.4 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.04 | 8% | 3.74 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.2% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 1.4% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73.15 | 1 dB | 72.2 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37.2 | 2.1% | 38 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52,297 | 18% | 44,905 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.53 | 2.5% | 8.74 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.12 | 4.7% | 5.37 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 607 | 45.6% | 1,116 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza All Season 6 scores 9.4 and the Solus 4S HA32+ 8.3 out of 10.
| Turanza All Season 6 | Category | Solus 4S HA32+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96 | Dry | 46 | ||
| 93 | Wet | 56 | ||
| 34 | Comfort | 32 | ||
| 58 | Value | 41 | ||
| 64 | Snow | 74 | ||
| 21 | Ice | 69 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Turanza All Season 6 | Category | Solus 4S HA32+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | Dry Grip | 7.3 | ||
| 8.7 | Wet Grip | 7 | ||
| 7.6 | Road Feedback | 6.2 | ||
| 7.9 | Handling | 5.7 | ||
| 8.4 | Wear | 8 | ||
| 7.7 | Comfort | 7 | ||
| 7.6 | Snow Grip | 8.7 | ||
| 7.3 | Ice Grip | 8 | ||
Owners rate the Turanza All Season 6 79% from 44 reviews and the Solus 4S HA32+ 67% from 6. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- 79%from 44 reviews
- 76%would buy again
- 393,509 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners broadly rate the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 as a very safe, summer-leaning all-season tyre, with a clear consensus around strong wet grip (mentioned by over half of reviewers) and similarly impressive dry grip. Snow traction is generally described as capable for occasional winter use, and around a third of owners also report encouraging tread life. The main drawbacks are feel and efficiency: around one in four owners complain of numb steering feedback and a similar share report higher rolling resistance/fuel consumption, while road noise is divisive with near-even praise and criticism.
- Very strong wet grip and confidence in heavy rain
- High dry grip that feels close to a summer tyre
- Capable snow traction for light to moderate winter conditions
- Good tread life for year-round use
- Numb steering feel and limited feedback near the limit
- Higher rolling resistance and a noticeable fuel economy hit for some
- Road noise can be intrusive on certain surfaces, despite others finding it quiet
Summarised by AI from 43 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 44 Turanza All Season 6 reviewsNow nearly 2 years and 20k miles in. These tyres are still as good as they were new and tread has only dropped to 5-6mm all round, suggesting >40,000 miles a set which is more than the OE Pirelli P7 summer tyres managed. Have experienced winter slush and light snow without any grip issues, when the car felt stable and safe, but as I live on the south coast with regular trips to family in Yorkshire, they don’t need to be a dedicated winter tyre. Economy unchanged around 45mpg overall, 50mpg on a motorway run. For my use, these have been very impressive and I would be happy to replace them with another set, although there may be even better choices in 3 years when these should be just about done.
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
- 67%from 6 reviews
- 67%would buy again
- 73,500 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers generally describe the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus as a good-value all-season tyre aimed at relaxed, family-car driving, with strong confidence in cold/wet conditions and good resistance to aquaplaning. Comfort is often rated well, with predictable behaviour when pushed moderately. The most consistent drawbacks are a less sporty/less communicative feel and some reports of instability or “float/drift,” plus a small fuel-economy penalty and occasional noise. One low-scoring outlier found the tyre extremely unstable and unsafe in the wet and at motorway speeds.
- Good wet/cold grip and overall safety for calm driving
- Strong aquaplaning resistance
- Good value versus premium alternatives and far better than budget/Chinese brands
- Comfortable ride and predictable handling at normal speeds
- Not suited to fast/sporty or powerful-car driving; muted steering/braking feel
- Some reports of unsteady/floaty behaviour (drift/fidgety feel)
- Higher rolling resistance leading to slightly worse fuel economy
Summarised by AI from 6 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 6 Solus 4S HA32+ reviewsBetter than Chinese brands but not even close to premium brands. Only for calm drive
Sizes, EU label and lineage
| Category | Turanza All Season 6 | Solus 4S HA32+ |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| On the market since | 2023 | - |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO (2020) | - |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best All Season Tyres for SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Turanza All Season 6 was the dearer tyre in 3 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 34.8% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a classic “premium safety margin vs budget value” all-season matchup. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is positioned as a premium-touring, do-it-all tyre, while the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus targets the same segment but typically at a much lower purchase price-making it attractive if you want all-season capability without the premium bill.
Across five shared professional tests (sizes spanning 225/45 R17 to 225/40 R18), a consistent pattern emerges: the Bridgestone repeatedly dominates the objective safety-critical metrics-especially braking and aquaplaning-while the Kumho's best moments come in subjective feel (notably wet handling) and comfort/noise, plus occasional snow-traction highlights. The result is less about “which is better overall” and more about what kind of risk and refinement trade-offs you're willing to accept.
Conclusion
On balance, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is the clearly stronger performer where it matters most for everyday safety: stopping distance and water management. It wins dry braking in all five shared tests, with meaningful margins (e.g., 36.8 m vs 42.5 m in AutoBild 2024, and 37.7 m vs 41.5 m in Die Reifentester 2026). Wet braking also consistently favors Bridgestone-sometimes by a lot (50.5 m vs 57.9 m in AutoBild 2024)-and its aquaplaning speeds/grip are repeatedly superior (e.g., straight aquaplaning 76.4 vs 69.4 km/h and curved 3.18 vs 2.64 m/s² in AutoBild 2024; similarly large curved-aqua gap in 2026). If you drive faster roads, deal with heavy rain, or simply prioritize maximum braking safety, the data points strongly to Bridgestone.
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus isn't without merit: it can feel confidence-inspiring on a wet handling circuit (notably a standout wet-handling ranking in the 2026 test), it tends to score better for comfort/noise, and it can be competitive in some snow metrics (AutoBild 2024 snow braking/traction/handling). But these upsides are undermined by its recurring weaknesses in dry braking and aquaplaning reserves-the exact areas that become non-negotiable in emergency situations. Add the mileage evidence from AutoBild 2024 (Bridgestone 54,800 km vs Kumho 40,800 km), and Bridgestone can also justify its premium via longer life and, in several tests, better efficiency-though one test (2026) flagged Bridgestone's rolling resistance as notably high.
Practical takeaway: the Bridgestone is the safer, more complete all-season choice with consistently stronger objective performance; the Kumho is best viewed as a value-oriented alternative for calmer driving and buyers who prioritize purchase price, comfort, and acceptable all-round behavior-while accepting smaller safety margins in braking and standing water.
Turanza All Season 6 vs Solus 4S HA32+: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 or the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ the better tyre?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 finished ahead 5 times and the Solus 4S HA32+ not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza All Season 6 scores 9.4 and the Solus 4S HA32+ 8.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Turanza All Season 6 or the Solus 4S HA32+?
The Turanza All Season 6 led 13 of the 16 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 9% shorter in the wet across 5 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Turanza All Season 6 led 8 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 10% shorter in the dry across 5 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Turanza All Season 6 led 6 of the 11 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.5% shorter on snow across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Turanza All Season 6 lasted 18% longer in the wear tests (2 tests), had 2.5% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) and used 4.7% less fuel (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.4/10 for the Turanza All Season 6 and 8/10 for the Solus 4S HA32+.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Solus 4S HA32+ was 1 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Turanza All Season 6 and 7/10 for the Solus 4S HA32+.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Turanza All Season 6 79% from 44 reviews and the Solus 4S HA32+ 67% from 6. 76% of Turanza All Season 6 owners would buy it again, against 67% for the Solus 4S HA32+.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Turanza All Season 6 was the dearer tyre in 3 of them, by 34.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9-18 in 30 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-5 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
5-23 in 29 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
4-6 in 10 shared tests
vs
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
14-7 in 21 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Goodyear Vector All Season 4
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8-3 in 13 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion