Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
WatchThe Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO is a premium all-season touring tyre aimed at drivers in milder climates who prioritise wet-road safety. It consistently delivers very strong wet braking with a reassuring, comfortable feel, and it also scores well for efficiency. The trade-offs are limited snow ability and some real-world reports of faster wear and rising noise as the tyre ages.
Videos
The Best 10 All Season / All Weather Tires for 2022/23 Tested and Rated!
In Depth Tyre Comparisons
View More ComparisonsAll Tests
View Test ResultsAlternative Tyres
| Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 inch | |||
| 185/65 R15 92 V XL | C | A | 70 |
| 195/55 R15 89 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 195/65 R15 91 H | C | A | 71 |
| 195/65 R15 95 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 195/65R15 95 V XL | C | A | 72 |
| 185/65R15 92 V XL | C | A | 70 |
| 16 inch | |||
| 205/55 R16 91 H | C | A | 71 |
| 205/55 R16 94 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 205/60 R16 96 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 215/60 R16 99 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 215/70 R16 100 H | C | A | 71 |
| 205/60R16 96 V XL | C | A | 72 |
| 205/55R16 94 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 17 inch | |||
| 205/50 R17 93 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 205/50 R17 93 W XL | C | A | 71 |
| 215/45 R17 91 W XL | C | A | 71 |
| 215/55 R17 98 W XL | C | A | 71 |
| 225/45 R17 94 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 225/45 R17 94 W XL | C | A | 71 |
| 225/50 R17 98 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 225/60 R17 103 V XL | C | A | 71 |
| 235/65 R17 108 V XL | B | A | 71 |
| 225/50R17 98 V XL | C | A | 72 |
| 215/55R17 98 W XL | C | A | 71 |
| 225/45R17 94 W XL | C | A | 71 |
| 18 inch | |||
| 225/40 R18 92 Y XL | C | A | 71 |
| 235/60 R18 107 V XL | B | A | 71 |
| 245/40 R18 97 Y XL | C | A | 71 |
| 245/45 R18 100 Y XL | C | A | 71 |
| 255/35 R18 94 Y XL | C | A | 72 |
| 225/40R18 92 Y XL | C | A | 71 |
| 19 inch | |||
| 235/35 R19 91 Y XL | C | A | 72 |
| 20 inch | |||
| 255/45 R20 105 Y XL | C | A | 72 |
Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Ask a questionPlease can you clarify the legal position on fitting these tyres for winter use, relative to sizing. Example: normal tyre is 225/50/R17 on alloys, but looking at a set of steel rims (for winter use only), that the dealer says will need to be R16, so the winter tyre size they recommended would be 215/60/R16. This should give the same rolling radius for the speedometer, but are there any legal or insurance implications? Thanks for any guidance you can offer.
Is this a van tyre I am looking for a tyre for my LWB transporter van
Does the size 245/45/19 have rim protection? Some sellers say yes, some dont mention. Thanks
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
| Size | Price Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 205/45 R17 | £180.99 - £180.99 (1 Price) | Compare Prices >> |
| 205/55 R16 | £104.99 - £104.99 (1 Price) | Compare Prices >> |
| Available in 15 tyre sizes - View all. | ||
Review Summary
Based on 43 user reviews
Overall, drivers report that the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO delivers strong wet grip and aquaplaning resistance with a comfortable, confidence-inspiring ride, often feeling secure in cold-wet conditions and adequate in light snow. However, many note rapid wear and a marked drop-off in performance (especially wet grip) and rising noise as the tread wears. A subset also report tread block damage or delamination and a soft, somewhat vague steering feel. If you prioritize wet safety and comfort and accept shorter tread life, it can be a solid choice.
Strengths
- Excellent wet grip
- Strong aquaplaning resistance
- Comfortable/quiet ride
- Secure handling in cold/wet
- Adequate light-snow traction
- Good dry grip for an all-season
Areas for Improvement
- Rapid tread wear/short longevity
- Performance and wet grip deteriorate noticeably as they wear
- Increased road noise with mileage
- Instances of tread block damage/delamination
- Soft sidewalls/vague steering feel
Top 3 Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Reviews
While the tread depth at the front is still 3-4 mm, the rear is almost completely gone. The cracking of the tread blocks at the front when turning the wheels has also increased significantly. We are very disappointed with these tires!!! (Front 245/45/19, rear 275/40/19)
Latest Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Reviews
Ignoring the understeer and the peeling of the profile on the front tires, the grip and braking in normal road conditions (wet and dry) was almost as good as the one from a summer tire.
In the first winter, I saw that the handling and grip left much to be desired but somehow acceptable, and the driving was stressful because of this but I got used to driving slower.
Afterwards in the warm season, it continued to be okay, no matter the road type.
But when the snow came, I got stuck in a slightly inclined intersection that would not have been a problem in the first year. I was the only car getting stuck there. Also, the driving was very dangerous event with a thin layer of snow. Driving as carefully as possible made the car uncontrollable. Steering was not possible without the rear of the car going sideways. Gently braking did not prevent the car from sliding forward.
For me, this is the first time I am getting rid of some tires after before two years.
So, after one year, this becomes basically a mediocre summer tire quite dangerous even with little snow. I find it unacceptable for a company like Bridgestone to sell this product of such low quality.
Old Tyre - Pirelli.
New Tyre = Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 215/50R17 95W XL
I would not say that Pirelli was a bad tyre.
But as soon as I had replaced the front 2 old Pirelli tyre with the new Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 215/50R17 95W XL, I could see a drastic positive difference in my car.
Road grip was excellent and superb - Both dry and wet !
Noise inside the car was reduced.
I started enjoying my rides.
Look forward to replace my tyres for the rear two wheels.
WIill always recommend and will buy again !
Wet grip when part worn was poor.
I choose Bridgestones over the Cross climates for the comfort, wet performance and lower rolling resistance.
Good-
Assured in the wet and dry, very comfortable, not found the limit of grip yet.
Bad-
Tyres started cracking around the tread blocks within 12months, louder than expected on the road, snow performance best described as lacking (short of what I'd expected).
Verdict-
Wouldn't buy again, would pick quieter tyres next time with better cold weather performance.
Average on dry.
Average on snow.
Then changed the rim from 16'' to 17''. A lot better. But this shouldnt be happening, it was dangerous on 16'' wheels.
On 17'' the grip was a lot better compared to 16'' overall, but again not good enough.
A little better than average on wet (many times abs was activated).
A little better than average on dry.
Average on snow
After 25000 km on 225/45/17 some parts were torn apart.
Wouldnt buy them again.
Nice but could be better on wet braking.
Nice on dry.
Nice but could be better or dry braking.
After 2 and a half years they are worn, even some parts are torn apart.
Got weared-out for less than 2 years and less than 15000 km.
Even during its first year, the performance was questionable.
Not worth for the money or at all.
Not recommended. Won't by ever again. It even made me hate Bridgestone and Japan brands in general, although I'm a lifetime Honda owner and fan.
The tyres were rotated twice throughout their life, and the 4 wheels aligned again in early 2023. The tyres were worn to 3 mm by 17,000 miles (27,358 km). By this point there was notable slippage on the front tyres when turning at slow speeds, especially in wetter conditions and overall, the tyres did not feel as planted on the road as they once were.
With low confidence in their grip ability at 3 mm, they were replaced with CC2s in December 2023. Hopefully, the longevity of the CC2s will be significantly better than the disappointing EVO’s.
A year and a half in, of mostly town driving, some motorway long hauls and some camping and dirt/track and shitty roads, the front right tyre is severely peeling.
The other front is well worn and the rears are on their way out.
I realise no brand is 100% dependable but we are not happy with the condition after a year and a half.
I realise that other conditions MAY be responsible for the state of the peeling but its most likely manufacturer error.
Its not like the other front looks like it has a couple more years left in it and the rear ones still good to go
- then we could just replace the one but this is looking like a full replacement and that doesn't seem right.