Menu

Test Charts / Motor

2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
235/60 R18
Tyres tested
9
Disciplines
13

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
39.6 m Best
40.1 m +0.50 m
41.6 m +2.00 m
42.2 m +2.60 m
43.8 m +4.20 m
44.2 m +4.60 m
44.2 m +4.60 m
45 m +5.40 m
45.7 m +6.10 m

The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (6.1 m ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
54.16 s Best
54.18 s +0.02 s
54.34 s +0.18 s
54.37 s +0.21 s
54.55 s +0.39 s
54.77 s +0.61 s
54.84 s +0.68 s
55.01 s +0.85 s
55.54 s +1.38 s

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
44.8 m Best 0 km/h
45 m +0.20 m 9 km/h
46 m +1.20 m 21 km/h
46 m +1.20 m 21 km/h
46.7 m +1.90 m 26 km/h
48.6 m +3.80 m 36 km/h
52.3 m +7.50 m 49 km/h
52.7 m +7.90 m 50 km/h
54.2 m +9.40 m 54 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 21% (9.4 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Debica Navigator 3 would still be travelling at 54 km/h when the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
87 s Best
87.4 s +0.40 s
87.5 s +0.50 s
87.8 s +0.80 s
87.9 s +0.90 s
88.3 s +1.30 s
90.6 s +3.60 s
90.6 s +3.60 s
91.8 s +4.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (4.8 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
79.8 km/h Best
79.6 km/h -0.20 km/h
79.4 km/h -0.40 km/h
77.6 km/h -2.20 km/h
77.5 km/h -2.30 km/h
74.8 km/h -5.00 km/h
74.7 km/h -5.10 km/h
73.7 km/h -6.10 km/h
72.3 km/h -7.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (7.5 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.16 m/sec2 Best
3.13 m/sec2 -0.03 m/sec2
3.08 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.03 m/sec2 -0.13 m/sec2
3.01 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
2.88 m/sec2 -0.28 m/sec2
2.74 m/sec2 -0.42 m/sec2
2.73 m/sec2 -0.43 m/sec2
2.37 m/sec2 -0.79 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 25% (0.79 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
18.2 m Best 0 km/h
18.3 m +0.10 m 10 km/h
18.3 m +0.10 m 10 km/h
18.7 m +0.50 m 21 km/h
18.9 m +0.70 m 25 km/h
19.3 m +1.10 m 31 km/h
19.5 m +1.30 m 34 km/h
19.9 m +1.70 m 38 km/h
20.5 m +2.30 m 44 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (2.3 m ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Imperial All Season Driver would still be travelling at 44 km/h when the Debica Navigator 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time (0 - 20 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
8.52 s Best
8.85 s +0.33 s
8.96 s +0.44 s
8.97 s +0.45 s
9.05 s +0.53 s
9.58 s +1.06 s
10.35 s +1.83 s
10.71 s +2.19 s
11.01 s +2.49 s

The difference between best and worst was 29.2% (2.49 s).

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
331 N Best
328.9 N -2.10 N
318.1 N -12.90 N
316.3 N -14.70 N
314.4 N -16.60 N
307.9 N -23.10 N
281.4 N -49.60 N
280.3 N -50.70 N
259.6 N -71.40 N

The difference between best and worst was 21.6% (71.4 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
78.4 s Best
78.6 s +0.20 s
79.4 s +1.00 s
80.2 s +1.80 s
81.6 s +3.20 s
81.9 s +3.50 s
82.3 s +3.90 s
82.7 s +4.30 s
89.5 s +11.10 s

The difference between best and worst was 14.2% (11.1 s).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
6.88 Points -0.12 Points
6.88 Points -0.12 Points
6.5 Points -0.50 Points
6.5 Points -0.50 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (1 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
65.4 dB Best
65.6 dB +0.20 dB
65.6 dB +0.20 dB
65.6 dB +0.20 dB
66.1 dB +0.70 dB
66.3 dB +0.90 dB
66.3 dB +0.90 dB
66.5 dB +1.10 dB
68.3 dB +2.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (2.9 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
0.66 kg/t Best £0
0.69 kg/t +0.03 kg/t £20
0.7 kg/t +0.04 kg/t £27
0.75 kg/t +0.09 kg/t £60
0.78 kg/t +0.12 kg/t £80
0.78 kg/t +0.12 kg/t £80
0.78 kg/t +0.12 kg/t £80
0.79 kg/t +0.13 kg/t £87
0.81 kg/t +0.15 kg/t £100

The difference between best and worst was 22.7% (0.15 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV uses about 69 L (£100) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h
Snow Traction
0 → 20 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.