Test Charts / Tekniikan Maailma
2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tyres tested
- 14
- Disciplines
- 10
- Test vehicle
- VW Golf
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
This test ranks different groups separately. Read the full verdicts for each group; there is no single overall finishing order.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 m | Best | |
| 30.8 m | Best | |
| 31.3 m | +0.50 m | |
| 31.4 m | +0.60 m | |
| 31.5 m | +0.70 m | |
| 32.2 m | +1.40 m | |
| 32.6 m | +1.80 m |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 31.5 m | Best | |
| 31.6 m | +0.10 m | |
| 31.9 m | +0.40 m | |
| 32.1 m | +0.60 m | |
| 32.2 m | +0.70 m | |
| 32.4 m | +0.90 m | |
| 33.4 m | +1.90 m |
The difference between best and worst was 8.4% (2.6 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths).
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -3.00 Points |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 33.3% (3 Points).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 37.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 37.7 m | +0.20 m | 9 km/h | |
| 37.9 m | +0.40 m | 13 km/h | |
| 39.4 m | +1.90 m | 29 km/h | |
| 39.5 m | +2.00 m | 29 km/h | |
| 41.1 m | +3.60 m | 38 km/h |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 35.5 m | +1.20 m | 24 km/h | |
| 36 m | +1.70 m | 28 km/h | |
| 36.3 m | +2.00 m | 31 km/h | |
| 37.3 m | +3.00 m | 37 km/h | |
| 37.8 m | +3.50 m | 40 km/h | |
| 40.8 m | +6.50 m | 52 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 19.8% (6.8 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Michelin X Ice Snow would still be travelling at 53 km/h when the Pirelli Ice Zero 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 39.9 s | Best | |
| 40 s | +0.10 s | |
| 40.3 s | +0.40 s | |
| 40.6 s | +0.70 s | |
| 41.4 s | +1.50 s | |
| 41.8 s | +1.90 s | |
| 41.8 s | +1.90 s |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40.1 s | Best | |
| 40.6 s | +0.50 s | |
| 41 s | +0.90 s | |
| 41.3 s | +1.20 s | |
| 41.5 s | +1.40 s | |
| 41.5 s | +1.40 s | |
| 42.1 s | +2.00 s |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (2.2 s).
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -3.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 33.3% (3 Points).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 49.6 m | +0.10 m | 6 km/h | |
| 49.8 m | +0.30 m | 10 km/h | |
| 49.9 m | +0.40 m | 12 km/h | |
| 50.2 m | +0.70 m | 15 km/h | |
| 50.3 m | +0.80 m | 16 km/h | |
| 50.4 m | +0.90 m | 17 km/h |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49.8 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 49.9 m | +0.10 m | 6 km/h | |
| 50.1 m | +0.30 m | 10 km/h | |
| 50.1 m | +0.30 m | 10 km/h | |
| 50.3 m | +0.50 m | 13 km/h | |
| 50.6 m | +0.80 m | 16 km/h | |
| 51 m | +1.20 m | 20 km/h |
All the tyres in the Snow Braking test finished less than 3% apart. From 130 km/h, the Kumho WinterCraft Ice Wi32 would still be travelling at 22 km/h when the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time (5 - 35 km/h)
Lower is better ↓Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8 s | Best | |
| 5.9 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.30 s |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s |
The difference between best and worst was 5.2% (0.3 s).
Ice
2Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45.6 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 47.1 m | +1.50 m | 23 km/h | |
| 47.9 m | +2.30 m | 28 km/h | |
| 47.9 m | +2.30 m | 28 km/h | |
| 50.2 m | +4.60 m | 39 km/h | |
| 53.3 m | +7.70 m | 49 km/h | |
| 53.5 m | +7.90 m | 50 km/h |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 33.1 m | +0.80 m | 20 km/h | |
| 33.9 m | +1.60 m | 28 km/h | |
| 36.9 m | +4.60 m | 46 km/h | |
| 37.7 m | +5.40 m | 49 km/h | |
| 41.6 m | +9.30 m | 61 km/h | |
| 42.5 m | +10.20 m | 64 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 65.6% (21.2 m ≈ 4.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 would still be travelling at 82 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak Spike 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Ice Traction
Ice acceleration time (5 - 20 km/h)
Lower is better ↓Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 s | Best | |
| 6.7 s | +0.40 s | |
| 6.8 s | +0.50 s | |
| 7.2 s | +0.90 s | |
| 7.2 s | +0.90 s | |
| 7.6 s | +1.30 s | |
| 8.2 s | +1.90 s |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 s | Best | |
| 4.7 s | +0.10 s | |
| 4.8 s | +0.20 s | |
| 5.1 s | +0.50 s | |
| 5.7 s | +1.10 s | |
| 5.8 s | +1.20 s | |
| 6.1 s | +1.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 78.3% (3.6 s).
Comfort
1Subj. Noise
Subjective in car noise levels
Higher is better ↑Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 40% (4 Points).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Wet Braking
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Snow Traction
- 5 → 35 km/h
- Ice Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
- Ice Traction
- 5 → 20 km/h

