Data Explorer / Tyre Reviews
The BEST Streetable Track Tyres in 2026 Tested
- Tested size
- 275/35 R18
- Tyres tested
- 5
- Disciplines
- 3
- Test vehicle
- F80 BMW M3
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
No test-specific category weights are recorded; this starts with season defaults.
Season defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tyres selected. Add tyres to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| s ↓ | s ↓ | Points ↑ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1= | 1 | 98.70 | 101.37 | 102.59 | 9.0 | 98.7 | |
StrengthsI found the Hoosier the most exciting tyre to drive, with immediate front-end response and excellent braking performance. ConsiderationsThe same sharp front response made the rear axle feel more lively, so it was not the most forgiving tyre. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.7 × 100% = 98.7 | |||||||
| 1= | 2 | 98.15 | 101.59 | 102.50 | 8.5 | 98.1 | |
StrengthsI found the Nankang CR-S extremely consistent, thermally stable, and easy to trust over repeated laps. ConsiderationsIt did not have the same sharpness or excitement as the Hoosier, and it was not quite as direct as the Vitour. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.15 × 100% = 98.15 | |||||||
| 2= | 3 | 97.89 | 101.69 | 104.15 | 9.0 | 97.9 | |
StrengthsI found the Vitour very impressive on its first flying lap, with direct steering and outstanding peak grip. ConsiderationsIts performance dropped away quickly once temperature built, especially at the rear. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.89 × 100% = 97.89 | |||||||
| 2= | 4 | 97.76 | 101.66 | 103.32 | 8.5 | 97.8 | |
StrengthsI found the Bridgestone strong from the start, with good warm-up, good braking, and a friendly feel on corner exit. ConsiderationsIt thermally degraded more than the Nankang, and it was wide enough to rub the rear arch. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.76 × 100% = 97.76 | |||||||
| 2= | — | — | 98.60 | — | 8.5 | — | |
StrengthsI found the Goodyear to have a clear raw grip advantage, feeling more like a race tyre than the other products tested alongside it. ConsiderationsIt did not feel as sharp or dynamic on steering as the other tyres, and it needed more steering angle to get the car turned. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry— | |||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Hoosier TrackAttack Pro
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tyres provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
Weighting vs real impact
What decides this ranking
The weighting is how much each category counts. The real impact is how much of the difference between the tyres it creates: a discipline in which every tyre performed about the same barely changes the order, however much it counts.
No weighting is recorded for this test, so the weighting here starts from Tyre Reviews’ season defaults, not from the test’s own scoring.
- Subj. Dry Handling counts for 9% of the score but creates 51% of the difference between the tyres, because their results in it were far apart.
- Dry Handling counts for 46% of the score but creates only 6% of the difference, because most tyres performed about the same in it.
Every discipline 3
| Discipline | Weighting | Real impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Handling | 46% | 6% |
| Dry Handling Long Run | 45% | 42% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 9% | 51% |
How it is worked out: each discipline’s weighting is multiplied by the spread of its results (the gap across the middle half of the tyres, as a percentage of the best result), then shared out so that all the disciplines add up to 100%. It estimates what separates the tyres; it is not a second set of weights, and it follows the weights you set.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tyre in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too. What decides this ranking ↑
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Tire Rack Streetable Track Tyre Test
275/35 R183 tyres tested
3 of these 5 tyres tested again
2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test
225/45 R187 tyres tested
Latest Summer Tyres test
2026 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test
205/55 R168 tyres tested
Latest Summer Tyres test
