P26 of 32
Beat 19% of the field
Apollo Alnac 4G All Season Test Results
Tested 2015 to 2021
4 publications
Tested 6 times by independent publications, the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season averages a finish of 15th.
- 6Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 1Podium finishes
- 15thAverage finish
- 21%Field beaten on average
- 4Publications
6 tests, 2015 to 2021
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 21%
Record by discipline
Where the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 4 | P18.3 of 24.3 | 26% | - |
| Dry Handling | 2 | P9.5 of 15 | 45% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 4 | P21.3 of 24.3 | 12% | - |
| Wet Handling | 2 | P14 of 15 | 7% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 1 | P10 of 12 | 18% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 1 | P11 of 12 | 9% | - |
| Snow Handling | 1 | P11 of 12 | 9% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 2 | P7 of 15 | 53% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P6 of 12 | 55% | - |
| Value | 1 | P4 of 12 | 73% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 1 | P7 of 12 | 45% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Continental AllSeasonContact
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Kleber Quadraxer 2
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Vredestein Quatrac 5
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Nexen N Blue 4 Season
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 6 tests. Updated October 28, 2026.
The Apollo Alnac 4G All Season usually finishes near the back, with wet braking a recurring weakness across six tests. Auto Bild placed it 28th of 32 overall in 2020 and 26th of 32 in 2021. Wet stops were 56m in 2020, 24.4% longer than best, and 58.5m in 2021, 17.2% longer. In the mixed summer and all-season Auto Navigator 2019 comparison it was also last for measured wet braking, while the 2017 Auto Bild test placed it last of ten overall.
The unusual exception was second of six in the 2015 Auto Bild SUV test in 215/65 R16, with praise for snow performance, dry lateral grip and low rolling resistance. That small SUV field and different size do not establish the same balance elsewhere: Auto Bild 2017 criticised very poor snow handling and high wear, recording snow handling eleventh of twelve at 56.3km/h. Dry handling was better there, fourth of twelve at 113.4km/h. Aquaplaning commentary also varies unusually, from weak in 2015 to strong in 2017, despite the latter's tenth-of-twelve straight result. These conflicting findings limit broad strengths; the more consistent concern is long wet stops.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry handling
Minor
in 1 of 2 tests
Details
- Good dry lateral grip praised, 2015 Auto Bild SUV all-season test
- Fourth of twelve at 113.4km/h, 2017 Auto Bild all-season test
good lateral grip on dry surfaces
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (2015)
-
Rolling resistance
Minor
in 1 of 2 tests
Details
- Very low rolling resistance praised, 2015 Auto Bild SUV test; seventh of twelve in the 2017 comparison limits consistency
very low rolling resistance
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (2015)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Strong
in 1 of 2 tests
Details
Strong aquaplaning resistance, low price
- 2017 All Season Tyre Test (2017)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet braking
Strong
in 1 of 2 tests
Details
- Long wet stops criticised, 2015 Auto Bild SUV test
- 28th of 33, 56m and 24.4% longer than best, 2020 Auto Bild overview
- 29th of 34, 58.5m and 17.2% longer than best, 2021 Auto Bild overview
Long braking distances on wet roads
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (2015)
-
Wet handling
Moderate
Details
- Eleventh of twelve at 71.6km/h, 2017 Auto Bild all-season test
- 17th of 18 at 44.2km/h in a mixed summer and all-season field, 2019 Auto Navigator
-
Snow handling
Minor
in 1 of 2 tests
Details
- Very poor snow handling criticised; eleventh of twelve at 56.3km/h, 2017 Auto Bild
- This conflicts with the unusually favourable general snow verdict in the 2015 Auto Bild SUV test
Very poor snow handling, high wear
- 2017 All Season Tyre Test (2017)
-
Tread life
Minor
in 1 of 2 tests
Details
- High wear criticised; predicted life 32,532km, 2017 Auto Bild all-season test
Very poor snow handling, high wear
- 2017 All Season Tyre Test (2017)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Strong
in 1 of 2 tests
Details
weak resistance to aquaplaning
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (2015)
Every test, newest first 6
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2021 1 test
2020 1 test
P28 of 32
Beat 13% of the field
2019 1 test
P15 of 15
Beat 0% of the field
2017 1 test
P10 of 10
Beat 0% of the field
2015 2 tests
P2 of 6
Beat 80% of the field
P7 of 8
Beat 14% of the field
Back to the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Apollo tyres