The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR draws its clearest praise for dry grip and value, with quiet running and a comfortable ride also mentioned regularly. Just over half of the 47 written reviews are positive, and the average score is 62.2%. Wet grip divides opinion, with 11 praising it and eight criticising it, so confidence in rain is far from universal. Tread life is equally mixed, with 12 positive comments and 11 complaints, including reports of rapid wear at the end of its life. Two of the three repeat reviewers lowered their scores on later visits, while the third remained satisfied, so there is no uniform ageing pattern.
What owners mention most counted across 46 reviews
This tyres are very poor at wet conditions. I have a Mercedes (RWD) and put them in the rear wheels. Every time I turn to anywhere, I can feel the back sliping off at low speed.
I will not buy this tyres again...
Member
BMW
225/45 R17 W
1,000 miles
A Combination of Roads
Spirited
Having had good previous experience with sailun, and wanting a good budget tyre for my bmw 320ci with sport suspension, I chose the ZSRs over other chinese alternatives.
And my choice was good. ... I am more than happy with these tyres, they are great. Comfortable, excellent grip, quiet, I am amazed they are so cheap... SAILUN is a premium brand for me, making excellent products. I am mich more.happy than with the michelin pilot sport 3 that they replaced.
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
So far (6000km) i am very satisfy with this tyres,i have a very good grip from them (dry-wet,δεν το σκιζω κιολας) and i put 9 for the scores (and not 10)because the car is quattro(the car had very good grip at any Greek road,dry-wet-snow,Με νοÏμαλ κ λιγο σπιÏτοζικη οδηγηση) Before them i had dunlop rt max sport (for 50000km,στο τελος με γκαζια εκανα πατιναζ σε γυαλι δÏομο,πλεον οχι!!)and now i see how good grip and comfort have the car(για τα λεφτα τους αξιζει να τα δοκιμαδεις,αν εισαι πλεον οικογενειαÏχης.καμια σχεση με τα φτηνιαÏικα)
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
Long-Term Review: Ordered two of these back in December 2014, and fitted them to my X-Type Jag. They have lasted well, wearing evenly and 19,000 miles later - all on the front axle, still have 2-3mm of tread left. That's pretty good - particularly on a front-wheel drive car.
In terms of handling, fuel economy, noise etc. I experienced no noticeable difference over other tyre brands fitted (I have owned the car since new and covered 96000 miles over the last 10 Years).
The original Pirelli's had a tendancy to 'tram-line' on some road surfaces and lasted 13-15K (font axle) before wearing out, so they are not worth the premium price.
Over the Years, I subsequently fitted Continental, Avon and Hankook tyres - all of which were good mid-range priced tyres, lasting around 13-15K.
So, I have just ordered another set of 4 Sailun's: In summary they appear slightly more durable than the other makes I have tried, have similar handling / refinement characteristics, and are very good overall value. It is easy therefore to recommend them.
Had a Sailun to the rear on BMW 5 Series (RWD) and after 2.5yrs & (15,000miles) I still have 6mm thread left. Very comfortable, durable and resilient tyre. Mixture of motorway, A and B roads with usually a family of 4 at all times..I can recommend these tyres highly.
I was a bit sceptical about trying these tyres as firstly I have been a bridgestone fan for many years and was very happy with the performance of my last tyres.I only decided to give the Sailun Altezzo ZSR 245/40-19 a go due to the huge price difference between these tyres with the Bridgestones ones that I was happy with. Bridgestones were $370 each...the Sailuns were $110 each.Because of my Finacial situation at the time, I decided to get some cheap and nasties until I was more financial to pay the big bucks....After having the Sailuns fitted...Guess what. The performance of handling of the tyres in dry and wet conditions along with tread wear and road noise was remarkably surprising. Compared to the Bridgestone, they seemed to be the same , if not better than the Bridgestones.....I will not look back now and continue to use these tyres as my back pocket is alot healthier. :)
This is a second review to correct a mistake done on the previous review of mine, if you see below there is a review stating driving a "BENTLEY".
Obviously it's a mistake as my car is a Honda Accord Euro. And since I revisited the same comments apply more or less as in the previous review of mine while having done 5000 miles.
Next change I may revert to the Z4+AS model from Sailun, their main advantage is economy , main drawback the noise
I have them on the front of my peugeot 5008,this is the 2nd set I've had and the last only capable of 7500 miles, maybe on the back they could give a better return.
Not great in the wet either.
41%
Member
Vauxhall
215/50 R17 W
2,000 miles
Mostly Motorways
Average
Had two of these fitted to the front to replace worn sailun z4 as tyres which I was impressed with, after 2 weeks with these I can say that I am fairly unimpressed with them they are noisy and do not grip on damp roads my traction control has to kick in. I checked the pressure that f1 autocentres put in and it was 38 psi too much in my opinion so I have reduced to 35psi to see how they perform at this moment in time I would say stay away a shame really as I thought these tyres would have been as good if not better than the Z4+as. If they do not improve I will look to either put them on the back or ditch them all together.
80%
Member
Bentley
225/45 R17
2,500 miles
A Combination of Roads
Average
- Less noisy than Sailun's Z4+AS directional model. Noise levels compare to tyres of the same size from premium brands .
- On this specific size 225/45/17, EU Label as regards to economy says "E" and this responds to reality. I spend an additional 0.7 Litre/100 km approximately compared to the Z4+AS that were "B" labelled. But I can assure you still better economy than the Michelins PS3 labelled "F".
-Tyres need to be somewhat overinflated than what recommended to meet my own preferences on handling, this was the case with all brands I have used on this car. 2,4 bars front and 2,3 back . But I find the ZRS's to be a little overresponsive as the Z4+AS have been, not the same thing with Michelins PSR or Continental sportcontacts. If I lower the pressure to recommended, the feedback from them doesn't satisfy me.
- Cheap tyres compared to premium brands, less than half the price !
- Wear looks very acceptable, I guess I could do around 30,000 km on them.
- Overall a good tyre for normal daily use. Not amazed by them, however I am satisfied.
This review is for the new Sailun Atrezzo ZSR tyre the new UHP tyre from Sailun. I opted for the new design and technology tyre from this up and coming firm as a result of my previous Atrezzo ZS+ tyres which have been very good in terms of grip, noise levels and their durability (incidentally the ZS+ have been on the car for 18 months, covered in excess of 18k miles and still have a good 5mm of tread all across the tyre).
I am pleased to say that these new tyres have so far performed very well. They are quiet, the feedback from the road through the steering linkage is sure and you feel the grip. For those looking for a good looking tyre this fits the bill there too. I am more than happy to have paid a shade over £50 each for these tyres (225/50/17W 98XL, you never know what you're going to get from a budget tyre but you will not be disappointed in your purchase with these. You would be forgiven for thinking that you could pay over £80-90 for these little gems.
I now have Sailuns on all four wheels and I never feel that I am about to lose control over the front or back wheels. Really happy with these and will most definitely recommend to friends.
