Ford Expedition Tyres
On this page you will find the best real world tyre reviews from owners of the Ford Expedition.
Do you Drive a Ford Expedition? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre! After all, who knows what the best tyre for a Expedition better than the owners?
| Tyre Reviewed | Dry Grip | Wet Grip | Feedback | Handling | Wear | Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin LTX AT2 (6) | 93% | 88% | 88% | 95% | 92% | 88% |
| Bridgestone Dueler AT Ascent (2) | 95% | 95% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 80% |
| Hankook Dynapro MT (5) | 83% | 75% | 70% | 68% | 83% | 58% |
| Goodyear Wrangler Fortitude HT (3) | 80% | 63% | 77% | 70% | 70% | 93% |
| Hankook Dynapro HT (4) | 73% | 65% | 48% | 55% | 55% | 68% |
Ford Expedition Tyre Review Highlights
Writing about the Bridgestone Dueler AT Ascent given 91% (275-65-18)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
I replaced a set of highway tires with these Bridgestone Dueler AT for a cross country trip to spend time camping and fishing the Rocky Mountains. Since I never had AT tires before I did not know what to expect and was concerned about their road manners. Well these really surprised me as I expected noticeably louder tires and degraded ride while traveling across country. But frankly, these sound and ride much like the highway tires they replaced. The traction is amazing in wet conditions. And off road they provided plenty of grip and cushion. I have taken them on mountain roads and trails in the Rockies and they perform exactly as I hoped for on road and off. It's hard to tell how long they will last, but after rotation and tire tread measurement after more than 10,000 miles I expect they deliver the longevity they advertise.
Writing about the Hankook Dynapro HT given 16% (275-65-18)
Driving on mostly motorways for 10000 easy going miles
Driving on mostly motorways for 10000 easy going miles
Do not buy these junk tires. I spent 500 bucks to keep trying to ballance one of them, brand new. 3 shops. Last was a road force ballance. Total wobble junk. Sent in to the rep, and bought another one, which was not much better. They even stated it was out of whack. No refund. Returned me my junk tire. Never again will I buy Junk Hankook tires. They have poor traction, and you will hate them.
Writing about the Goodyear Wrangler Fortitude HT given 72% (275-65-18-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 45000 average miles
Driving on mostly motorways for 45000 average miles
tires are on a2015 ford expedition ,tread wore of sides of tires but good tread in middle of tire with 36psi all 4 tires at 40,000 mile. bought a new set and ran 40psi , wore out the same way. is not an alienment problem .
Writing about the Michelin LTX AT2 given 88% (265-70-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 45000 spirited miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 45000 spirited miles
No comments left
Writing about the Hankook Dynapro MT given 86% (285-75-16-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 17000 spirited miles
Driving on mostly country roads for 17000 spirited miles
I have been running 285/75/R16 Hankook Dynapro MT tires on my 2.7 ton 1997 Ford Expedition for 5 years now. Almost immediately after buying them, I had the tires siped i.e. cuts about 5-7mm deep made with about 5mm step onto the tire (the edges of the tread were not cut to maintain good directional habits for the tire). In summer, the grip was awesome compared to street or All Terrain, in some situation where the former tires warranted 4wd, the Dynapro Mud Terrain was still good in 2wd, especially on grass or gravel. In shallow mud, the 4wd made the vehicle unstoppable.
On streets I essentially got the stability of a train. Not kidding, my record for the vehicle keeping a lane without me touching the wheel at 40mph is about 2.8km. No problems on tram lines, no issues when tracks have been worn into the asphalt. I have never managed to get these tires to aquaplane, no matter the speed or rainfall. I can also ignore all speed bumps and humps. I can still tell what each of my wheels are doing and can still feel the paint on the pavement through the tires and suspension
Traction on snow and ice was markedly improved after getting the tires siped. I did, and now I've been running siped tires for 5 winters in Eastern Europe. Works perfectly well in loose on in packed snow, even on ice, albeit better in 4wd. It have even used the car to pull trees from the forest in deep snow. In the same snow a Subaru XV on regular Nordic winter tires had real trouble. One year in snowy conditions I briefly had one of the tires on the rear axle siped while the other was not siped, The result was that I was only able to move in 2wd thanks to the limited slip in the rear, so great was the difference in traction between siped and unsiped. Siping is absolutely necessary to run these tires in snow, on ice and generally in winter.
The main downsides are fuel economy and noise. I went from 17.5L/100km to 20L/100km in city by switching from 265/70R17 street tires to these. The tires are most economical at or below 50 mph. At 75-80 the fuel economy rises to 20L/100km on highway. As for noise, similar numbers apply. For newer tires with more tread, about 50mph is the maximum you want to do. With more wear 55-60mph can be tolerated. Beyond 65mph the noise becomes deafening.
Overall, I think for general purpose and off road, this tire size and this tire in particular is perfect for this vehicle, or a vehicle in similar size or weight. I now have about 25k kilometers on the tires and I can see them lasting at least 15k more before they lose their good traction in snow and muddy off road.