Giti GitiWinterW2 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- TR Score
- 7.8/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 1
- TR Score
- 9.0/10
- Owners say
- 87% · 30
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro finished ahead 6 times and the GitiWinterW2 once. The GitiWinterW2 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 5.9% higher speed; the Wintrac Pro lasted 10.6% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Buy the Vredestein Wintrac Pro. It finished ahead in six of seven shared tests, brakes shorter in the wet and on ice, rolls easier and lasts longer. The Giti GitiWinterW2 is the choice if you drive roads that flood and buy on price, where its clean sweep of aquaplaning and consistently lower price make a real case.
Where the GitiWinterW2 is stronger
- Better aquaplaning resistance in every measurement, six straight and five curved
- Quieter in all four noise measurements
- Cheaper in all four price comparisons, 375 against 515 at Auto Zeitung
Where the Wintrac Pro is stronger
- Finished ahead in six of the seven shared tests, 3rd of 16 against 9th at ADAC
- Shorter wet braking in five of seven tests, by 12.7 percent at Auto Zeitung
- Longer life and lower rolling resistance, 48,800km against 40,600km and all four measurements
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
GitiWinterW2 vs Wintrac Pro at a glance
| Category | GitiWinterW2 | Gap | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won7 shared tests | 1 | 6 | |
| Dry12 measurements | 4 | The Wintrac Pro stopped 1.7% shorter in the dry (6 tests) | 8 |
| Wet27 measurements | 15 | The GitiWinterW2 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 5.9% higher speed (6 tests) | 12 |
| Snow20 measurements | 7 | The Wintrac Pro averaged a 3.3% higher speed on the snow handling course (2 tests) | 12 |
| Ice2 measurements | 0 | The Wintrac Pro stopped 4.7% shorter on ice (2 tests) | 2 |
| Comfort6 measurements | 4 | The GitiWinterW2 was 0.9 dB quieter (4 tests) | 1 |
| Value9 measurements | 1 | The Wintrac Pro lasted 10.6% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) | 8 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 7.8/10 | The Wintrac Pro by 1.2 | 9.0/10 |
| Owner rating1 and 30 reviews | 86% | Too close to call | 87% |
| Pricein the 5 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Wintrac Pro was dearer in 5 of 5 | +14.7% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 57 | 36 sizes made in both | 119 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 7 tests, 2022 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | GitiWinterW2 | Field | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | P8 of 12 | P6 of 12 | |
| 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | P9 of 16 | P3 of 16 | |
| 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | P8 of 9 | P5 of 9 | |
| 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test | P28 of 54 | P17 of 54 | |
| 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | P7 of 11 | P8 of 11 | |
| 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | P8 of 15 | P5 of 15 | |
| 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | P8 of 8 | P5 of 8 |
Performance profile
21 measurements from the 7 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
GitiWinterW2
Wintrac Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
GitiWinterW2
Wintrac Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | GitiWinterW2 | Gap | Wintrac Pro | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.99 | 1.7% | 44.18 | 2-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67.85 | 0.1% | 67.95 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 113 | 0.5% | 113.6 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 0.3% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 38.85 | 2.8% | 37.33 | 2-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40.8 | 3.7% | 39.3 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77.25 | 1.1% | 75.79 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 81 | 0.4% | 81.3 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 23.2% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.36 | 0.7% | 7.41 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.26 | 0.4% | 16.2 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.07 | 5.9% | 75.73 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.95 | 11.5% | 2.65 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21.31 | 0.3% | 21.21 | 2-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.09 | 1.8% | 5.98 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,177 | 1.8% | 1,179 | 2-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 85.76 | 0.3% | 85.51 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57.5 | 3.3% | 59.4 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 10.1% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.39 | 1.2% | 4.34 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19.1 | 4.7% | 18.15 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 1.1% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.85 | 0.9 dB | 72.75 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40,850 | 10.6% | 45,150 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.12 | 3.9% | 8.77 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.7 | 1.7% | 5.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 85.05 | 20.6% | 67.35 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the GitiWinterW2 scores 7.8 and the Wintrac Pro 9 out of 10.
| GitiWinterW2 | Category | Wintrac Pro | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | Dry | 67 | ||
| 78 | Wet | 86 | ||
| 47 | Comfort | 33 | ||
| 22 | Value | 29 | ||
| 41 | Snow | 58 | ||
| 25 | Ice | 67 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| GitiWinterW2 | Category | Wintrac Pro | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Dry Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 9 | Wet Grip | 9 | ||
| 9 | Road Feedback | 8.5 | ||
| 8 | Handling | 8.2 | ||
| 6 | Wear | 8.7 | ||
| 10 | Comfort | 8.7 | ||
| 10 | Snow Grip | 8.8 | ||
| 8 | Ice Grip | 8.1 | ||
Owners rate the GitiWinterW2 86% from 1 reviews and the Wintrac Pro 87% from 30. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- 87%from 30 reviews
- 93%would buy again
- 226,700 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Vredestein Wintrac Pro is a highly confidence-inspiring winter tyre with standout wet-road grip and surprisingly sporty, summer-like steering feel and stability in cold dry conditions. Most users also praise strong traction and braking in snow/slush, along with good comfort, low noise for the category, and impressive tread life/value over multiple seasons. A smaller subset note higher fuel consumption/rolling resistance and that the tyre can need some warm-up or a short bedding-in period to deliver its best grip.
- Strong wet grip and braking (good aquaplaning resistance)
- Stable, predictable handling with good steering feedback (sporty/summer-like feel)
- Very capable snow and slush traction and confidence
- Good comfort and generally quiet for a winter/UHP tyre
- Higher fuel consumption / rolling resistance than some alternatives
- Needs some warm-up or short bedding-in to reach best grip
Summarised by AI from 28 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 30 Wintrac Pro reviewsVery good tires for winter. Used in upstate New York from November to April. Great grip even in -15 F. Started to get a little vague when it was dry around 65F.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 57 sizes of the GitiWinterW2 and 119 of the Wintrac Pro, 36 of them made in both.
| Category | GitiWinterW2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 57 sizes, 13 to 21 inch | 119 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 36 sizes 205/45 R17205/50 R17205/55 R17215/40 R17215/45 R17215/50 R17215/55 R17215/60 R17215/65 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17and 24 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B96%A4% | B98%A2%C1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | D60%C29%E9%B2% | D47%C46%E5%B1% |
| EU label noise | 68-74 dB A68%B32% | 70-74 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 127 of 127 | 253 of 253 |
| On the market since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Replaced | Giti GitiWinterW1 (2017) | Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S (2015) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Wintrac Pro was the dearer tyre in 5 of the 5 tests that listed prices, by 14.7% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Seven shared winter tests and the Vredestein Wintrac Pro finished ahead in six of them, the exception being our own 2023 winter test, where the Giti GitiWinterW2 was 7th of 13 and the Vredestein 8th. Elsewhere the gaps are clear: 3rd of 16 against 9th at ADAC in 2024, 5th of 9 against 8th at Sport Auto, 5th of 8 against last at Auto Zeitung and 17th of 54 against 28th in Auto Bild's braking test.
Aquaplaning is the Giti's stand-out, and it is emphatic. It resisted better in all six straight-line measurements and all five curved ones, by 20.7 percent through the curve at Sport Auto, 2.92 against 2.42 m/sec2, and by 10.3 percent on the straight at Auto Bild, 81 against 73.4 km/h. It was also quieter in all four noise measurements and cheaper in all four price comparisons, 115 against 137 at ADAC.
The Vredestein wins nearly everything else, including wet braking in five of seven tests, rolling resistance in all four, wear in both and both ice braking measurements.
Conclusion
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro is the stronger winter tyre. It finished ahead in six of the seven shared tests, 3rd of 16 against 9th at ADAC in 2024, 5th of 9 against 8th at Sport Auto, 5th of 8 against 8th and last at Auto Zeitung, 5th of 15 against 8th at ADAC in 2023, 6th of 13 against 8th at Auto Bild and 17th of 54 against 28th in the braking test. It braked shorter in the wet in five of seven tests, by 12.7 percent at Auto Zeitung, 53.6m against 61.4m, took snow braking four to two and snow traction four to two, and it rolled with less resistance in all four measurements. Longevity is one-sided too, 48,800km against 40,600km at ADAC with 64.7 against 88.1mg/km/t of abrasion, and it stopped shorter on ice in both measurements, 19.5m against 21m.
The Giti GitiWinterW2 is the aquaplaning and value specialist. It resisted standing water better in every single measurement, six straight and five curved, by 20.7 percent at Sport Auto and 14.8 percent at ADAC, it was quieter in all four noise measurements, and it undercut the Vredestein in all four price comparisons, 375 against 515 at Auto Zeitung, 27.2 percent less. In our own 2023 test its subjective dry and wet handling scores were the higher of the two, 98 points against 95 and 98 against 92.
Those subjective scores are worth a caveat: Auto Zeitung's panel came to the opposite conclusion on wet handling, 26 points against 17 for the Vredestein, so the two juries disagree sharply. Note also the Giti has just 1 owner review on the site against 30 for the Vredestein. For most winter drivers the Vredestein's snow, wet braking and wear advantages settle it; the Giti earns its place if you drive in heavy standing water and buy on price.
GitiWinterW2 vs Wintrac Pro: your questions
Is the Giti GitiWinterW2 or the Vredestein Wintrac Pro the better tyre?
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro finished ahead 6 times and the GitiWinterW2 once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the GitiWinterW2 scores 7.8 and the Wintrac Pro 9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the GitiWinterW2 or the Wintrac Pro?
The GitiWinterW2 led 15 of the 27 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it resisted straight aquaplaning at a 5.9% higher speed across 6 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Wintrac Pro led 8 of the 12 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.7% shorter in the dry across 6 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Wintrac Pro led 12 of the 20 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it averaged a 3.3% higher speed on the snow handling course across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Wintrac Pro lasted 10.6% longer in the wear tests (2 tests), had 3.9% lower rolling resistance (4 tests) and shed 20.6% less rubber in the abrasion test (2 tests). Owners rate wear 6/10 for the GitiWinterW2 and 8.7/10 for the Wintrac Pro.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The GitiWinterW2 was 0.9 dB quieter (4 tests). Owners rate comfort 10/10 for the GitiWinterW2 and 8.7/10 for the Wintrac Pro.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the GitiWinterW2 86% from 1 reviews and the Wintrac Pro 87% from 30.
Which is more expensive?
In the 5 tests that listed prices, the Wintrac Pro was the dearer tyre in 5 of them, by 14.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The GitiWinterW2 is made in 57 sizes (13 to 21 inch) and the Wintrac Pro in 119 (17 to 22 inch). 36 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the GitiWinterW2 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Wintrac Pro B and D.
Which is the newer tyre?
The GitiWinterW2 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Wintrac Pro in 2018. The GitiWinterW2 replaced the Giti GitiWinterW1. The Wintrac Pro replaced the Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
11-3 in 14 shared tests
vs
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
16-0 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
17-1 in 18 shared tests
vs
Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
1-6 in 8 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
22-8 in 31 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
10-6 in 17 shared tests
vs
Giti GitiWinterW2 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-8 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Giti GitiWinterW2 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
0-13 in 13 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion