Falken Eurowinter HS01 vs BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tyres, the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 finished ahead 10 times and the Eurowinter HS01 not once. The Eurowinter HS01 was stronger in dry, the gForce Winter 2 in wet, snow, comfort and value.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 10 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Eurowinter HS01
gForce Winter 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Eurowinter HS01
gForce Winter 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Eurowinter HS01
gForce Winter 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Eurowinter HS01 85% from 23 reviews and the gForce Winter 2 89% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Eurowinter HS01 | Gap | gForce Winter 2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Eurowinter HS01 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 45.2 | 0.6% | 45.53 | 2-2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 118 | 0.3% | 117.6 | 3-1 |
| Wet gForce Winter 2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 42.4 | 1% | 42.14 | 2-6 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 70.23 | 0.1% | 70.18 | 1-2 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.87 | 0.2% | 12.84 | 1-2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 84.83 | 0.4% | 85.15 | 1-3 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.06 | 0.1% | 3.06 | 2-1 |
| Snow gForce Winter 2 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 28.59 | 4.4% | 27.35 | 0-8 |
| Snow Traction N | 1,936 | 6.9% | 2,077 | 0-4 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 51.25 | 2.9% | 52.75 | 0-4 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.72 | 2.9% | 3.82 | 0-2 |
| Comfort gForce Winter 2 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 72.38 | 1 dB | 71.38 | 1-3 |
| Value gForce Winter 2 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 36,388 | 8% | 33,708 | 2-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 10.04 | 10.4% | 8.98 | 0-4 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 10 tests, 2019 to 2022
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Eurowinter HS01 | Field | gForce Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P13 of 20 | P9 of 20 | |
| 2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P12 of 56 | P6 of 56 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | P9 of 13 | P8 of 13 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P12 of 20 | P11 of 20 | |
| 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | P8 of 10 | P4 of 10 | |
| 2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tyre Test | P7 of 16 | P5 of 16 | |
| 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P19 of 50 | P7 of 50 | |
| 2020 ACE Winter Tyre Test | P9 of 9 | P2 of 9 | |
| 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | P31 of 51 | P7 of 51 | |
| 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | P25 of 53 | P7 of 53 |
Eurowinter HS01 vs gForce Winter 2: your questions
Is the Falken Eurowinter HS01 or the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 the better tyre?
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tyres, the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 finished ahead 10 times and the Eurowinter HS01 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Eurowinter HS01 scores 8.1 and the gForce Winter 2 8.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Eurowinter HS01 or the gForce Winter 2?
The gForce Winter 2 led 14 of the 23 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1% shorter in the wet across 8 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Eurowinter HS01 led 5 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The gForce Winter 2 led 18 of the 18 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.4% shorter on snow across 8 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Eurowinter HS01 lasted 8% longer in the wear tests (2 tests); the gForce Winter 2 had 10.4% lower rolling resistance (4 tests). Owners rate wear 8.8/10 for the Eurowinter HS01 and 8.7/10 for the gForce Winter 2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The gForce Winter 2 was 1 dB quieter (4 tests). Owners rate comfort 8/10 for the Eurowinter HS01 and 9.2/10 for the gForce Winter 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Eurowinter HS01 85% from 23 reviews and the gForce Winter 2 89% from 30. 91% of Eurowinter HS01 owners would buy it again, against 100% for the gForce Winter 2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the gForce Winter 2 was the dearer tyre in 4 of them, by 13.4% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Eurowinter HS01 is made in 98 sizes (13 to 21 inch) and the gForce Winter 2 in 75 (14 to 20 inch). 57 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Eurowinter HS01 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the gForce Winter 2 B and D.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Eurowinter HS01 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2017, the gForce Winter 2 in 2016.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
13-5 in 20 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
3-14 in 17 shared tests
vs
Barum Polaris 5 vs BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
0-13 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Falken Eurowinter HS01
16-0 in 17 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Firestone Winterhawk 4
9-5 in 14 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Semperit Speed Grip 5
6-4 in 11 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Fulda Kristall Control HP2
19-0 in 19 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.