Hankook Winter i cept RS2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
In the 9 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 finished ahead 9 times and the Winter i cept RS2 not once. The Blizzak LM005 was stronger in dry, wet, snow and value.
Performance profile
11 measurements from the 9 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter i cept RS2
Blizzak LM005
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 97%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Winter i cept RS2
Blizzak LM005
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Winter i cept RS2
Blizzak LM005
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Winter i cept RS2 81% from 50 reviews and the Blizzak LM005 73% from 115. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Winter i cept RS2 | Gap | Blizzak LM005 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Blizzak LM005 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 45.63 | 1.6% | 46.43 | 2-1 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 109.2 | 1% | 110.3 | 0-2 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 12.5% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Blizzak LM005 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 40.94 | 6.6% | 38.32 | 0-5 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 72.35 | 1.7% | 73.6 | 1-1 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 80% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.64 | 0.4% | 12.59 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 79.93 | 0.2% | 79.57 | 2-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.18 | 0.6% | 3.2 | 0-1 |
| Snow Blizzak LM005 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 26.44 | 0.6% | 26.28 | 0-4 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,495 | 1.5% | 2,537 | 0-2 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 68.15 | 1.7% | 66.9 | 2-0 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | 66.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 71.95 | 1.9 dB | 70.05 | 1-1 |
| Value Blizzak LM005 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 37,360 | 2.1% | 36,765 | 1-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.27 | 11.7% | 8.18 | 0-3 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 9 tests, 2019 to 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter i cept RS2 | Field | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 8 | P1 of 8 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P6 of 20 | P5 of 20 | |
| 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P3 of 50 | P1 of 50 | |
| The Best Winter Tyres for 2020 | P3 of 19 | P1 of 19 | |
| 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | P4 of 14 | P1 of 14 | |
| 2020 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 9 | P1 of 9 | |
| 2020 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 | P4 of 15 | P1 of 15 | |
| 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | P9 of 20 | P5 of 20 | |
| 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | P12 of 53 | P1 of 53 |
Winter i cept RS2 vs Blizzak LM005: your questions
Is the Hankook Winter i cept RS2 or the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 the better tyre?
In the 9 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 finished ahead 9 times and the Winter i cept RS2 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter i cept RS2 scores 9 and the Blizzak LM005 8.9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter i cept RS2 or the Blizzak LM005?
The Blizzak LM005 led 10 of the 13 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6.6% shorter in the wet across 5 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Blizzak LM005 led 4 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it averaged a 1% higher speed on the dry handling course across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Blizzak LM005 led 7 of the 10 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.6% shorter on snow across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Blizzak LM005 had 11.7% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 8.5/10 for the Winter i cept RS2 and 5.9/10 for the Blizzak LM005.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.5/10 for the Winter i cept RS2 and 7.5/10 for the Blizzak LM005.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter i cept RS2 81% from 50 reviews and the Blizzak LM005 73% from 115. 80% of Winter i cept RS2 owners would buy it again, against 56% for the Blizzak LM005.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Blizzak LM005 was the dearer tyre in 3 of them, by 15.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Winter i cept RS2 is made in 43 sizes (13 to 17 inch) and the Blizzak LM005 in 165 (14 to 22 inch). 24 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter i cept RS2 is graded C for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Blizzak LM005 A and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Winter i cept RS2 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Blizzak LM005 in 2019. The Blizzak LM005 replaced the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
4-6 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8-5 in 14 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
5-10 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
5-4 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
8-10 in 18 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Alpin 6
15-9 in 24 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5
16-7 in 23 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
22-8 in 31 shared tests
Every Hankook vs Bridgestone test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.