Menu

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs GT-Radial FE2 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

4 tyres compared 6 shared tests Summer
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Summer · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews8.6
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses
GT-Radial FE2
GT-Radial FE2
Summer · Ultra High Performance
Tyre Reviews7.8
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
6
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Summer · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Summer · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews8.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses

Adjust Category Weighting

Adjust the importance of each performance category to see how different priorities affect the overall ranking across all shared tests.

Dry 35%
Wet 50%
Comfort 5%
Value 10%
Dry 35% · Wet 50% · Comfort 5% · Value 10%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Comfort
Value
RankTyreScoreDryWetComfortValue
1Hankook Ventus Prime 498.7%99.4%98.9%97%96.6%
2Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun98.4%98.6%99.7%99.4%91.1%
3Kumho Ecsta HS5298.1%99.9%97.7%95.1%95.2%
4GT-Radial FE295.6%97.3%95.1%97.5%91.2%

Category Breakdown

Detailed Breakdowns

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Tyre Weight [Kg] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test-by-Test Win/Draw/Loss Record
Tests Included in This Comparison