Menu

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Semperit Speed Grip 5

In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 and the Semperit Speed Grip 5 to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.

There are a few basic differences between the two tyres. The Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is an Ultra-High-Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Semperit Speed Grip 5 is an High-Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars

Winter-i-cept-evo3 VS Speed-Grip-5

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of six total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Hankook Winter i cept evo3six
six wins

While it might look like the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is better than the Semperit Speed Grip 5 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 3.66% less distance than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.93M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
45.6M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.8M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
46.6M (+2.8M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.7M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
44.3M (+0.6M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
44.3M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
45.9M (+1.6M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Semperit Speed Grip 5 was 0.13% faster around a lap than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
113.45Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
113.6Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Semperit Speed Grip 5

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
112Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
111.4Km/H (-0.6Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
114.9Km/H (-0.9Km/H)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
115.8Km/H

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 0.48% less distance than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
41.6M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
41.8M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
35.3M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
36.1M (+0.8M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
35.2M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
35.9M (+0.7M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
55M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
56.1M (+1.1M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
32.9M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
33.3M (+0.4M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
35.6M (+0.7M)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
34.9M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
55.6M (+1.1M)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
54.5M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 0.27% less distance than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
37.5M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
37.6M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
37.5M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
37.6M (+0.1M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 2.59% faster around a wet lap than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
82.95Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
80.8Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
84.3Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
79.5Km/H (-4.8Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
81.6Km/H (-0.5Km/H)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
82.1Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 had 10.34% higher lateral wet grip than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.9m/s
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2.6m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.9m/s
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2.6m/s (-0.3m/s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 floated at a 1.01% higher speed than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
81.8Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
80.97Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
94.9Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
92.4Km/H (-2.5Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
74Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
74.2Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
76.5Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
76.3Km/H (-0.2Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 slipped out at a 17.14% higher speed than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.8m/sec2
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2.32m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.88m/sec2
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2.16m/sec2 (-0.72m/sec2)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.72m/sec2
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2.48m/sec2 (-0.24m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 1.92% less distance than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
25.52M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
26.02M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
26.6M (+0.7M)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
25.9M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
30.3M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
31.3M (+1M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
30.3M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
31.3M (+1M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
9.7M (+0.1M)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
9.6M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
28.1M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
29M (+0.9M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
28.1M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
29M (+0.9M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 had 4.42% better snow traction than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
1854.33N
Semperit Speed Grip 5
1772.33N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2765N
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2646N (-119N)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
238N
Semperit Speed Grip 5
235N (-3N)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2560N
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2436N (-124N)

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 1.37% faster around a lap than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
58.45Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
57.65Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
57.7Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
58.1Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
59.2Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
57.2Km/H (-2Km/H)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 4.53% faster through a slalom than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
3.09m/sec2
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2.95m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
3.25m/sec2
Semperit Speed Grip 5
3.09m/sec2 (-0.16m/sec2)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.92m/sec2
Semperit Speed Grip 5
2.8m/sec2 (-0.12m/sec2)

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Semperit Speed Grip 5 stopped the vehicle 2.3% shorter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
17.4M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
17M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Semperit Speed Grip 5

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
17.4M (+0.4M)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
17M

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scored 8.22% more points than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
7.3 Points
Semperit Speed Grip 5
6.7 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
7.3 Points
Semperit Speed Grip 5
6.7 Points (-0.6 Points)

Noise

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 was better during two noise tests. On average the Semperit Speed Grip 5 measured 0.74% quieter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
71.8dB
Semperit Speed Grip 5
71.27dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Semperit Speed Grip 5

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
73.8dB (+1.8dB)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
72dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
75.3dB (+1.1dB)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
74.2dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
66.3dB
Semperit Speed Grip 5
67.6dB (+1.3dB)

Wear

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two wear tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is predicted to cover 14.1% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
52915.67KM
Semperit Speed Grip 5
45455.33KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
34407KM (-10069KM)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
44476KM
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
72400KM
Semperit Speed Grip 5
47900KM (-24500KM)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
51940KM
Semperit Speed Grip 5
43990KM (-7950KM)

Value

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 was better during one value tests. On average the Semperit Speed Grip 5 proved to have a 5.93% better value based on price/1000km than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
12.32Price/1000
Semperit Speed Grip 5
11.59Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Semperit Speed Grip 5

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
15.4Price/1000 (+3.37Price/1000)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
12.03Price/1000
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
9.24Price/1000
Semperit Speed Grip 5
11.14Price/1000 (+1.9Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Semperit Speed Grip 5 had a 5.99% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.85kg / t
Semperit Speed Grip 5
8.32kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Semperit Speed Grip 5

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.79kg / t (+0.31kg / t)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
8.48kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.9kg / t (+0.75kg / t)
Semperit Speed Grip 5
8.15kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 used 1.72% less fuel than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5.7l/100km
Semperit Speed Grip 5
5.8l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5.7l/100km
Semperit Speed Grip 5
5.8l/100km (+0.1l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 emitted 15.15% less particle wear matter than the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
56mg/km/t
Semperit Speed Grip 5
66mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
56mg/km/t
Semperit Speed Grip 5
66mg/km/t (+10mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 and Semperit Speed Grip 5.

In total the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 has been reviewed 20 times and drivers have given the tyre 85% overall.

The Semperit Speed Grip 5 has been reviewed 2 times and drivers have given the tyre 89% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Semperit Speed Grip 5.

Best Review for the Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Given 48% 225/40 R18 V on a combination of roads for 900 spirited miles
Very uncomfortable tyre, the sidewall also looks different than on the website, I sold them after a couple of weeks.
Helpful 1190 - tyre reviewed on November 1, 2020
View all Hankook Winter i cept evo3 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Semperit Speed Grip 5
Given 84% 225/45 R17 on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
I had used ug8 before this tyre and semperit is better than goodyear. I have been using all type of condition on winter and warm weathers, handling is always very good. Price of tyre is very good. I strongly recommend this tyre for everyone.
Helpful 876 - tyre reviewed on April 10, 2022
View all Semperit Speed Grip 5 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 performed better in dry braking, wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [km/h], wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, snow braking, snow traction, snow handling [km/h], snow slalom, subj. comfort, wear, fuel consumption and abrasion, while the Semperit Speed Grip 5 performed better in dry handling [km/h], ice braking, noise, value and rolling resistance.

Interestingly, both tyres performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling and snow handling, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Hankook Winter i cept evo3 seems to be the best tyre overall.

However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.

Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Overall Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.