Here's the low down on the results if you don't fancy reading the full test:
- 3PMSF: no
Strong in every category, winning the wet braking, wet handling, dry braking and snow traction tests. A very special winter tyre
Higher cabin noise than some of the other leading winter tyres
Total: 1085.4
Dry
199.7
Wet
388.4
Snow
398.6
Noise
98.7
- 3PMSF: no
Best aquaplaning result, fastest in the dry, good snow performance and a strong wet lap time
Slightly high rolling resistance
Total: 1079.4
Dry
196.7
Wet
394.7
Snow
388
Noise
100
- 3PMSF: no
Best snow braking and handling, second fastest in dry handling
Average noise and aquaplaning resistance scores
Total: 1066.6
Dry
198.4
Wet
370.2
Snow
399.2
Noise
98.8
- 3PMSF: no
Strong snow handling, joint quietest tyre on test and good wet and dry braking and handling
Poor aquaplaning results and average snow braking
Total: 1057.1
Dry
197.4
Wet
370.1
Snow
389.6
Noise
100
- 3PMSF: no
Very strong aquaplaning resistance, keen pricing, good dry performance and good wet handling
Last in the snow tests by a small margin
Total: 1050.3
Dry
198.8
Wet
373.9
Snow
379
Noise
98.6
- 3PMSF: no
Good snow braking, strong resistance to aquaplaning and dynamic in the dry
Struggled in snow traction and wet braking and handling. High rolling resistance
Total: 1053.9
Dry
197.6
Wet
371.9
Snow
385.8
Noise
98.6
- 3PMSF: no
Nice progressive slide on wet handling, second place in wet braking and good noise and rolling resistance
Not quite as strong in the snow as the leaders, weak aquaplaning results
Total: 1030.3
Dry
196.4
Wet
352.6
Snow
382
Noise
99.3
- 3PMSF: no
Most economical tyre
Extremely poor performances in every wet and dry test. When the Continental had stopped the car in the wet braking test, you'd still be doing 24mph on the LingLong
Total: 956.5
Dry
193.1
Wet
281.9
Snow
382.5
Noise
99