Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/55 R17
Tyres tested
10
Disciplines
9

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
39.2 m -5.30 m
44.5 m Best
44.8 m +0.30 m
45.5 m +1.00 m
46.1 m +1.60 m
46.4 m +1.90 m
46.4 m +1.90 m
46.5 m +2.00 m
46.7 m +2.20 m
47 m +2.50 m
48.2 m +3.70 m

The difference between best and worst was 23% (9 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
114.7 km/h +0.30 km/h
114.4 km/h Best
114 km/h -0.40 km/h
113.8 km/h -0.60 km/h
113.7 km/h -0.70 km/h
113.5 km/h -0.90 km/h
113.2 km/h -1.20 km/h
113 km/h -1.40 km/h
112.9 km/h -1.50 km/h
112.2 km/h -2.20 km/h
111.2 km/h -3.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (3.5 Km/H).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
53.4 m Best
53.5 m +0.10 m
53.7 m +0.30 m
54.4 m +1.00 m
RefReference Summer
54.6 m +1.20 m
55.2 m +1.80 m
56.3 m +2.90 m
56.7 m +3.30 m
58.5 m +5.10 m
63.2 m +9.80 m
63.8 m +10.40 m

The difference between best and worst was 19.5% (10.4 m ≈ 2.3 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
74 km/h +0.50 km/h
73.5 km/h Best
73.3 km/h -0.20 km/h
73.2 km/h -0.30 km/h
72.8 km/h -0.70 km/h
72.7 km/h -0.80 km/h
70.8 km/h -2.70 km/h
70.8 km/h -2.70 km/h
70.4 km/h -3.10 km/h
69 km/h -4.50 km/h
68.5 km/h -5.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (5.5 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
79 km/h Best
76 km/h -3.00 km/h
RefReference Summer
74.8 km/h -4.20 km/h
74.7 km/h -4.30 km/h
74.5 km/h -4.50 km/h
73.1 km/h -5.90 km/h
72.7 km/h -6.30 km/h
72.3 km/h -6.70 km/h
70.7 km/h -8.30 km/h
70.4 km/h -8.60 km/h
67.8 km/h -11.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.2% (11.2 Km/H).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
22 m Best
22.1 m +0.10 m
22.4 m +0.40 m
22.4 m +0.40 m
22.4 m +0.40 m
22.9 m +0.90 m
22.9 m +0.90 m
23 m +1.00 m
23.1 m +1.10 m
23.9 m +1.90 m
RefReference Summer
57.9 m +35.90 m

The difference between best and worst was 163.2% (35.9 m ≈ 8 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
48.6 km/h Best
48.5 km/h -0.10 km/h
48.3 km/h -0.30 km/h
48.2 km/h -0.40 km/h
48.1 km/h -0.50 km/h
48.1 km/h -0.50 km/h
48 km/h -0.60 km/h
47.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
47 km/h -1.60 km/h
45.8 km/h -2.80 km/h
RefReference Summer
37 km/h -11.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 23.9% (11.6 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
72.1 dB Best
72.5 dB +0.40 dB
72.8 dB +0.70 dB
73.2 dB +1.10 dB
73.5 dB +1.40 dB
73.6 dB +1.50 dB
73.6 dB +1.50 dB
73.6 dB +1.50 dB
73.7 dB +1.60 dB
73.9 dB +1.80 dB
RefReference Summer
74.5 dB +2.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (2.4 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
8.26 kg/t Best £0
8.34 kg/t +0.08 kg/t £4
RefReference Summer
8.71 kg/t +0.45 kg/t £24
9.12 kg/t +0.86 kg/t £46
9.14 kg/t +0.88 kg/t £47
9.18 kg/t +0.92 kg/t £49
9.21 kg/t +0.95 kg/t £51
9.31 kg/t +1.05 kg/t £56
9.69 kg/t +1.43 kg/t £76
9.91 kg/t +1.65 kg/t £88
10.1 kg/t +1.84 kg/t £98

The difference between best and worst was 22.3% (1.84 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05 uses about 68 L (£98) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.