Test Charts / Auto Zeitung
2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 245/45 R19
- Tyres tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 19
- Test vehicle
- BMW 520d Touring
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
3Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42.4 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 42.8 m | +0.40 m | 13 km/h | |
| 43.3 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 43.4 m | +1.00 m | 20 km/h | |
| 43.6 m | +1.20 m | 22 km/h | |
| 43.6 m | +1.20 m | 22 km/h | |
| 44.6 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 44.8 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +2.80 m | 32 km/h | |
| 46.2 m | +3.80 m | 37 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 9% (3.8 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 would still be travelling at 37 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 75.2 s | Best | |
| 75.6 s | +0.40 s | |
| 75.8 s | +0.60 s | |
| 75.9 s | +0.70 s | |
| 75.9 s | +0.70 s | |
| 76.3 s | +1.10 s | |
| 76.3 s | +1.10 s | |
| 76.6 s | +1.40 s | |
| 76.7 s | +1.50 s | |
| 77.3 s | +2.10 s |
All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Points | Best | |
| 28 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 26 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 25 Points | -5.00 Points | |
| 23 Points | -7.00 Points | |
| 22 Points | -8.00 Points | |
| 20 Points | -10.00 Points | |
| 18 Points | -12.00 Points | |
| 15 Points | -15.00 Points | |
| 13 Points | -17.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 56.7% (17 Points).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.6 m | Best | |
| 49.3 m | +0.70 m | |
| 50.6 m | +2.00 m | |
| 51.3 m | +2.70 m | |
| 51.4 m | +2.80 m | |
| 52.4 m | +3.80 m | |
| 52.7 m | +4.10 m | |
| 53.3 m | +4.70 m | |
| 53.4 m | +4.80 m | |
| 56.8 m | +8.20 m |
The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (8.2 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 84.9 s | Best | |
| 85.3 s | +0.40 s | |
| 86.3 s | +1.40 s | |
| 86.4 s | +1.50 s | |
| 86.5 s | +1.60 s | |
| 87.2 s | +2.30 s | |
| 88.1 s | +3.20 s | |
| 88.4 s | +3.50 s | |
| 89.1 s | +4.20 s | |
| 91.5 s | +6.60 s |
The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (6.6 s).
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45 Points | Best | |
| 42 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 38 Points | -7.00 Points | |
| 35 Points | -10.00 Points | |
| 34 Points | -11.00 Points | |
| 33 Points | -12.00 Points | |
| 31 Points | -14.00 Points | |
| 30 Points | -15.00 Points | |
| 25 Points | -20.00 Points | |
| 19 Points | -26.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 57.8% (26 Points).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.26 s | Best | |
| 12.35 s | +0.09 s | |
| 12.43 s | +0.17 s | |
| 12.52 s | +0.26 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.37 s | |
| 12.67 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.67 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.68 s | +0.42 s | |
| 12.72 s | +0.46 s | |
| 13.16 s | +0.90 s |
The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (0.9 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 91 km/h | Best | |
| 90.3 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 88.2 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 88.2 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 88.1 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 88 km/h | -3.00 km/h | |
| 87.9 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 86.7 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 86.4 km/h | -4.60 km/h | |
| 85.4 km/h | -5.60 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (5.6 Km/H).
Snow
5Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25.7 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 25.9 m | +0.20 m | 11 km/h | |
| 26 m | +0.30 m | 14 km/h | |
| 26.1 m | +0.40 m | 16 km/h | |
| 26.3 m | +0.60 m | 20 km/h | |
| 26.3 m | +0.60 m | 20 km/h | |
| 26.4 m | +0.70 m | 21 km/h | |
| 26.4 m | +0.70 m | 21 km/h | |
| 27.1 m | +1.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 27.6 m | +1.90 m | 34 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (1.9 m ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Linglong Sport Master Winter would still be travelling at 34 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3575 N | Best | |
| 3480 N | -95.00 N | |
| 3440 N | -135.00 N | |
| 3420 N | -155.00 N | |
| 3355 N | -220.00 N | |
| 3255 N | -320.00 N | |
| 3210 N | -365.00 N | |
| 3110 N | -465.00 N | |
| 3090 N | -485.00 N | |
| 3030 N | -545.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (545 N).
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 68 s | Best | |
| 68.1 s | +0.10 s | |
| 68.3 s | +0.30 s | |
| 70.7 s | +2.70 s | |
| 70.8 s | +2.80 s | |
| 71.1 s | +3.10 s | |
| 71.2 s | +3.20 s | |
| 71.6 s | +3.60 s | |
| 72.4 s | +4.40 s | |
| 73.7 s | +5.70 s |
The difference between best and worst was 8.4% (5.7 s).
Subj. Snow Handling
Subjective Snow Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Points | Best | |
| 27 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 25 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 23 Points | -6.00 Points | |
| 21 Points | -8.00 Points | |
| 19 Points | -10.00 Points | |
| 18 Points | -11.00 Points | |
| 15 Points | -14.00 Points | |
| 13 Points | -16.00 Points | |
| 12 Points | -17.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 58.6% (17 Points).
Snow Circle
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.88 ms/2 | Best | |
| 3.86 ms/2 | -0.02 ms/2 | |
| 3.76 ms/2 | -0.12 ms/2 | |
| 3.69 ms/2 | -0.19 ms/2 | |
| 3.59 ms/2 | -0.29 ms/2 | |
| 3.47 ms/2 | -0.41 ms/2 | |
| 3.46 ms/2 | -0.42 ms/2 | |
| 3.43 ms/2 | -0.45 ms/2 | |
| 3.39 ms/2 | -0.49 ms/2 | |
| 3.19 ms/2 | -0.69 ms/2 |
The difference between best and worst was 17.8% (0.69 ms/2).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 25% (2 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.3 dB | Best | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 76.2 dB | +5.90 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 8.4% (5.9 dB).
Value
4Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 46,750 KM | Best | |
| 43,750 KM | -3,000 KM | |
| 40,750 KM | -6,000 KM | |
| 40,000 KM | -6,750 KM | |
| 39,750 KM | -7,000 KM | |
| 31,250 KM | -15,500 KM | |
| 31,000 KM | -15,750 KM | |
| 30,500 KM | -16,250 KM | |
| 28,500 KM | -18,250 KM | |
| 27,500 KM | -19,250 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 41.2% (19,250 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.72 Price/1000 | Best | €17.36 | |
| 13.52 Price/1000 | +0.80 Price/1000 | €22.91 | |
| 19.2 Price/1000 | +6.48 Price/1000 | €23.56 | |
| 22.52 Price/1000 | +9.80 Price/1000 | €27.94 | |
| 23.08 Price/1000 | +10.36 Price/1000 | €31.23 | |
| 23.32 Price/1000 | +10.60 Price/1000 | €25.85 | |
| 24.52 Price/1000 | +11.80 Price/1000 | €26.29 | |
| 25.28 Price/1000 | +12.56 Price/1000 | €29.77 | |
| 27.12 Price/1000 | +14.40 Price/1000 | €30.96 | |
| 28 Price/1000 | +15.28 Price/1000 | €34.06 |
The difference between best and worst was 120.1% (15.28 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Triangle Effexwinter) works out €668 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Wintrac Pro+).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.6 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.9 kg/t | +0.30 kg/t | £17 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £35 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £35 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £35 | |
| 8.4 kg/t | +0.80 kg/t | £46 | |
| 8.7 kg/t | +1.10 kg/t | £64 | |
| 8.7 kg/t | +1.10 kg/t | £64 | |
| 9.3 kg/t | +1.70 kg/t | £99 | |
| 9.6 kg/t | +2.00 kg/t | £116 |
The difference between best and worst was 26.3% (2 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 80 L (£116) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Abrasion
Millimetre of tread lost per 1000km driven
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 0.12 mm/1000km | Best | |
| 0.14 mm/1000km | +0.02 mm/1000km | |
| 0.15 mm/1000km | +0.03 mm/1000km | |
| 0.15 mm/1000km | +0.03 mm/1000km | |
| 0.15 mm/1000km | +0.03 mm/1000km | |
| 0.19 mm/1000km | +0.07 mm/1000km | |
| 0.2 mm/1000km | +0.08 mm/1000km | |
| 0.21 mm/1000km | +0.09 mm/1000km | |
| 0.22 mm/1000km | +0.10 mm/1000km | |
| 0.22 mm/1000km | +0.10 mm/1000km |
The difference between best and worst was 83.3% (0.1 mm/1000km).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets
245/45 R1950 tyres tested
8 of these 10 tyres tested again
2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tyres tested
8 of these 10 tyres tested again
2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test
245/45 R1920 tyres tested
7 of these 10 tyres tested again
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P / Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
This test’s winner finished 5th there
