Test Charts / ADAC
2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 185/65 R15
- Tyres tested
- 16
- Disciplines
- 13
- Test vehicle
- Skoda Fabia
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 43.8 m | +0.50 m | 14 km/h | |
| 44.2 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 44.3 m | +1.00 m | 20 km/h | |
| 44.3 m | +1.00 m | 20 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.20 m | 21 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.20 m | 21 km/h | |
| 44.6 m | +1.30 m | 22 km/h | |
| 44.9 m | +1.60 m | 25 km/h | |
| 45 m | +1.70 m | 25 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 46.1 m | +2.80 m | 32 km/h | |
| 46.2 m | +2.90 m | 33 km/h | |
| 46.4 m | +3.10 m | 34 km/h | |
| 47.4 m | +4.10 m | 38 km/h | |
| 48.4 m | +5.10 m | 42 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (5.1 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Viking WinTech NewGen would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Linglong Sport Master Winter had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 35.3 m | +1.80 m | 29 km/h | |
| 36.1 m | +2.60 m | 35 km/h | |
| 36.5 m | +3.00 m | 37 km/h | |
| 37.1 m | +3.60 m | 40 km/h | |
| 37.1 m | +3.60 m | 40 km/h | |
| 37.1 m | +3.60 m | 40 km/h | |
| 37.7 m | +4.20 m | 43 km/h | |
| 38.5 m | +5.00 m | 47 km/h | |
| 38.9 m | +5.40 m | 48 km/h | |
| 39.1 m | +5.60 m | 49 km/h | |
| 39.8 m | +6.30 m | 52 km/h | |
| 39.8 m | +6.30 m | 52 km/h | |
| 43.5 m | +10.00 m | 62 km/h | |
| 48.7 m | +15.20 m | 73 km/h | |
| 51.4 m | +17.90 m | 77 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 53.4% (17.9 m ≈ 4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Rockblade ROCK 868S would still be travelling at 77 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36.9 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 39 m | +2.10 m | 30 km/h | |
| 39.4 m | +2.50 m | 33 km/h | |
| 39.4 m | +2.50 m | 33 km/h | |
| 39.8 m | +2.90 m | 35 km/h | |
| 40.1 m | +3.20 m | 37 km/h | |
| 40.2 m | +3.30 m | 37 km/h | |
| 40.2 m | +3.30 m | 37 km/h | |
| 41.7 m | +4.80 m | 44 km/h | |
| 42.1 m | +5.20 m | 46 km/h | |
| 42.2 m | +5.30 m | 46 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +7.20 m | 53 km/h | |
| 44.6 m | +7.70 m | 54 km/h | |
| 48.5 m | +11.60 m | 64 km/h | |
| 53.3 m | +16.40 m | 72 km/h | |
| 56 m | +19.10 m | 76 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 51.8% (19.1 m ≈ 4.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Rockblade ROCK 868S would still be travelling at 76 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 98.6 km/h | Best | |
| 97.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 96.1 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 95.1 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 94.5 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 93.5 km/h | -5.10 km/h | |
| 88 km/h | -10.60 km/h | |
| 87.3 km/h | -11.30 km/h | |
| 86.8 km/h | -11.80 km/h | |
| 86.1 km/h | -12.50 km/h | |
| 85.9 km/h | -12.70 km/h | |
| 85.9 km/h | -12.70 km/h | |
| 83.7 km/h | -14.90 km/h | |
| 78.2 km/h | -20.40 km/h | |
| 73.6 km/h | -25.00 km/h | |
| 67.4 km/h | -31.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 31.6% (31.2 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 4.3 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 4.1 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 4 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 3.9 m/sec2 | -0.50 m/sec2 | |
| 3.9 m/sec2 | -0.50 m/sec2 | |
| 3.5 m/sec2 | -0.90 m/sec2 | |
| 3.4 m/sec2 | -1.00 m/sec2 | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -1.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.2 m/sec2 | -1.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.2 m/sec2 | -1.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.2 m/sec2 | -1.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3 m/sec2 | -1.40 m/sec2 | |
| 2.9 m/sec2 | -1.50 m/sec2 | |
| 2.2 m/sec2 | -2.20 m/sec2 | |
| 1.3 m/sec2 | -3.10 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 70.5% (3.1 m/sec2).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.10 m | 13 km/h | |
| 10.2 m | +0.20 m | 18 km/h | |
| 10.2 m | +0.20 m | 18 km/h | |
| 10.2 m | +0.20 m | 18 km/h | |
| 10.2 m | +0.20 m | 18 km/h | |
| 10.3 m | +0.30 m | 22 km/h | |
| 10.4 m | +0.40 m | 25 km/h | |
| 10.4 m | +0.40 m | 25 km/h | |
| 10.5 m | +0.50 m | 28 km/h | |
| 10.6 m | +0.60 m | 31 km/h | |
| 10.7 m | +0.70 m | 33 km/h | |
| 10.7 m | +0.70 m | 33 km/h | |
| 10.7 m | +0.70 m | 33 km/h | |
| 10.9 m | +0.90 m | 37 km/h | |
| 11 m | +1.00 m | 39 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 10% (1 m). From 130 km/h, the Atlas Polarbear HP would still be travelling at 39 km/h when the Barum Polaris 6 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2961 N | Best | |
| 2927 N | -34.00 N | |
| 2904 N | -57.00 N | |
| 2868 N | -93.00 N | |
| 2851 N | -110.00 N | |
| 2842 N | -119.00 N | |
| 2837 N | -124.00 N | |
| 2828 N | -133.00 N | |
| 2825 N | -136.00 N | |
| 2811 N | -150.00 N | |
| 2809 N | -152.00 N | |
| 2809 N | -152.00 N | |
| 2800 N | -161.00 N | |
| 2775 N | -186.00 N | |
| 2772 N | -189.00 N | |
| 2569 N | -392.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (392 N).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters (20 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.4 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 19.6 m | +0.20 m | 13 km/h | |
| 20.1 m | +0.70 m | 24 km/h | |
| 20.2 m | +0.80 m | 26 km/h | |
| 20.9 m | +1.50 m | 35 km/h | |
| 21 m | +1.60 m | 36 km/h | |
| 21 m | +1.60 m | 36 km/h | |
| 21.2 m | +1.80 m | 38 km/h | |
| 21.5 m | +2.10 m | 41 km/h | |
| 21.5 m | +2.10 m | 41 km/h | |
| 21.5 m | +2.10 m | 41 km/h | |
| 21.9 m | +2.50 m | 44 km/h | |
| 22 m | +2.60 m | 45 km/h | |
| 22 m | +2.60 m | 45 km/h | |
| 22.4 m | +3.00 m | 48 km/h | |
| 22.6 m | +3.20 m | 49 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 16.5% (3.2 m ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 would still be travelling at 49 km/h when the Rockblade ROCK 868S had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.9 dB | Best | |
| 70.2 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.5 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.5 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.5 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 72.5 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 73.1 dB | +3.20 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (3.2 dB).
Value
4Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40,000 KM | Best | |
| 35,800 KM | -4,200 KM | |
| 35,300 KM | -4,700 KM | |
| 34,300 KM | -5,700 KM | |
| 33,100 KM | -6,900 KM | |
| 32,000 KM | -8,000 KM | |
| 30,700 KM | -9,300 KM | |
| 30,500 KM | -9,500 KM | |
| 29,800 KM | -10,200 KM | |
| 29,500 KM | -10,500 KM | |
| 29,000 KM | -11,000 KM | |
| 29,000 KM | -11,000 KM | |
| 28,300 KM | -11,700 KM | |
| 28,200 KM | -11,800 KM | |
| 27,300 KM | -12,700 KM | |
| 22,400 KM | -17,600 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 44% (17,600 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18 Price/1000 | Best | |
| 1.3 Price/1000 | +0.12 Price/1000 | |
| 1.68 Price/1000 | +0.50 Price/1000 | |
| 1.74 Price/1000 | +0.56 Price/1000 | |
| 1.86 Price/1000 | +0.68 Price/1000 | |
| 2.02 Price/1000 | +0.84 Price/1000 | |
| 2.03 Price/1000 | +0.85 Price/1000 | |
| 2.07 Price/1000 | +0.89 Price/1000 | |
| 2.16 Price/1000 | +0.98 Price/1000 | |
| 2.19 Price/1000 | +1.01 Price/1000 | |
| 2.31 Price/1000 | +1.13 Price/1000 | |
| 2.33 Price/1000 | +1.15 Price/1000 | |
| 2.34 Price/1000 | +1.16 Price/1000 | |
| 2.42 Price/1000 | +1.24 Price/1000 | |
| 2.48 Price/1000 | +1.30 Price/1000 | |
| 3.26 Price/1000 | +2.08 Price/1000 |
The difference between best and worst was 176.3% (2.08 Price/1000).
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.3 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.3 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.4 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.4 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.5 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.5 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.5 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.5 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.5 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.5 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.40 l/100km | £110 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.50 l/100km | £138 |
The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (0.5 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 95 L (£138) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Abrasion
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 63 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 73 mg/km/t | +10.00 mg/km/t | |
| 77 mg/km/t | +14.00 mg/km/t | |
| 79 mg/km/t | +16.00 mg/km/t | |
| 82 mg/km/t | +19.00 mg/km/t | |
| 82 mg/km/t | +19.00 mg/km/t | |
| 82 mg/km/t | +19.00 mg/km/t | |
| 87 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 93 mg/km/t | +30.00 mg/km/t | |
| 95 mg/km/t | +32.00 mg/km/t | |
| 107 mg/km/t | +44.00 mg/km/t | |
| 108 mg/km/t | +45.00 mg/km/t | |
| 110 mg/km/t | +47.00 mg/km/t | |
| 113 mg/km/t | +50.00 mg/km/t | |
| 117 mg/km/t | +54.00 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 85.7% (54 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking - Concrete
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 30 → 0 km/h
- Ice Braking
- 20 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test
225/45 R1715 tyres tested
6 of these 16 tyres tested again
2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test
205/55 R1612 tyres tested
6 of these 16 tyres tested again
2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tyres tested
6 of these 16 tyres tested again

