Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
185/65 R15
Tyres tested
16
Disciplines
13
Test vehicle
Skoda Fabia

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
43.3 m Best 0 km/h
43.8 m +0.50 m 14 km/h
44.2 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
44.3 m +1.00 m 20 km/h
44.3 m +1.00 m 20 km/h
44.5 m +1.20 m 21 km/h
44.5 m +1.20 m 21 km/h
44.6 m +1.30 m 22 km/h
44.9 m +1.60 m 25 km/h
45 m +1.70 m 25 km/h
45.2 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
46.1 m +2.80 m 32 km/h
46.2 m +2.90 m 33 km/h
46.4 m +3.10 m 34 km/h
47.4 m +4.10 m 38 km/h
48.4 m +5.10 m 42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (5.1 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Viking WinTech NewGen would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Linglong Sport Master Winter had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
33.5 m Best 0 km/h
35.3 m +1.80 m 29 km/h
36.1 m +2.60 m 35 km/h
36.5 m +3.00 m 37 km/h
37.1 m +3.60 m 40 km/h
37.1 m +3.60 m 40 km/h
37.1 m +3.60 m 40 km/h
37.7 m +4.20 m 43 km/h
38.5 m +5.00 m 47 km/h
38.9 m +5.40 m 48 km/h
39.1 m +5.60 m 49 km/h
39.8 m +6.30 m 52 km/h
39.8 m +6.30 m 52 km/h
43.5 m +10.00 m 62 km/h
48.7 m +15.20 m 73 km/h
51.4 m +17.90 m 77 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 53.4% (17.9 m ≈ 4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Rockblade ROCK 868S would still be travelling at 77 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking - Concrete

Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking - Concrete
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
36.9 m Best 0 km/h
39 m +2.10 m 30 km/h
39.4 m +2.50 m 33 km/h
39.4 m +2.50 m 33 km/h
39.8 m +2.90 m 35 km/h
40.1 m +3.20 m 37 km/h
40.2 m +3.30 m 37 km/h
40.2 m +3.30 m 37 km/h
41.7 m +4.80 m 44 km/h
42.1 m +5.20 m 46 km/h
42.2 m +5.30 m 46 km/h
44.1 m +7.20 m 53 km/h
44.6 m +7.70 m 54 km/h
48.5 m +11.60 m 64 km/h
53.3 m +16.40 m 72 km/h
56 m +19.10 m 76 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 51.8% (19.1 m ≈ 4.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Rockblade ROCK 868S would still be travelling at 76 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
98.6 km/h Best
97.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
96.1 km/h -2.50 km/h
95.1 km/h -3.50 km/h
94.5 km/h -4.10 km/h
93.5 km/h -5.10 km/h
88 km/h -10.60 km/h
87.3 km/h -11.30 km/h
86.8 km/h -11.80 km/h
86.1 km/h -12.50 km/h
85.9 km/h -12.70 km/h
85.9 km/h -12.70 km/h
83.7 km/h -14.90 km/h
78.2 km/h -20.40 km/h
73.6 km/h -25.00 km/h
67.4 km/h -31.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 31.6% (31.2 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
4.4 m/sec2 Best
4.3 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
4.1 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
4 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3.9 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
3.9 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
3.5 m/sec2 -0.90 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -1.00 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -1.10 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -1.20 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -1.20 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -1.20 m/sec2
3 m/sec2 -1.40 m/sec2
2.9 m/sec2 -1.50 m/sec2
2.2 m/sec2 -2.20 m/sec2
1.3 m/sec2 -3.10 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 70.5% (3.1 m/sec2).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
10 m Best 0 km/h
10.1 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
10.2 m +0.20 m 18 km/h
10.2 m +0.20 m 18 km/h
10.2 m +0.20 m 18 km/h
10.2 m +0.20 m 18 km/h
10.3 m +0.30 m 22 km/h
10.4 m +0.40 m 25 km/h
10.4 m +0.40 m 25 km/h
10.5 m +0.50 m 28 km/h
10.6 m +0.60 m 31 km/h
10.7 m +0.70 m 33 km/h
10.7 m +0.70 m 33 km/h
10.7 m +0.70 m 33 km/h
10.9 m +0.90 m 37 km/h
11 m +1.00 m 39 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 10% (1 m). From 130 km/h, the Atlas Polarbear HP would still be travelling at 39 km/h when the Barum Polaris 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2961 N Best
2927 N -34.00 N
2904 N -57.00 N
2868 N -93.00 N
2851 N -110.00 N
2842 N -119.00 N
2837 N -124.00 N
2828 N -133.00 N
2825 N -136.00 N
2811 N -150.00 N
2809 N -152.00 N
2809 N -152.00 N
2800 N -161.00 N
2775 N -186.00 N
2772 N -189.00 N
2569 N -392.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (392 N).

Ice

1

Ice Braking

Ice braking in meters (20 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
19.4 m Best 0 km/h
19.6 m +0.20 m 13 km/h
20.1 m +0.70 m 24 km/h
20.2 m +0.80 m 26 km/h
20.9 m +1.50 m 35 km/h
21 m +1.60 m 36 km/h
21 m +1.60 m 36 km/h
21.2 m +1.80 m 38 km/h
21.5 m +2.10 m 41 km/h
21.5 m +2.10 m 41 km/h
21.5 m +2.10 m 41 km/h
21.9 m +2.50 m 44 km/h
22 m +2.60 m 45 km/h
22 m +2.60 m 45 km/h
22.4 m +3.00 m 48 km/h
22.6 m +3.20 m 49 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 16.5% (3.2 m ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 would still be travelling at 49 km/h when the Rockblade ROCK 868S had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
69.9 dB Best
70.2 dB +0.30 dB
70.5 dB +0.60 dB
71.2 dB +1.30 dB
71.3 dB +1.40 dB
71.5 dB +1.60 dB
71.5 dB +1.60 dB
71.5 dB +1.60 dB
71.6 dB +1.70 dB
72.1 dB +2.20 dB
72.3 dB +2.40 dB
72.3 dB +2.40 dB
72.4 dB +2.50 dB
72.5 dB +2.60 dB
72.9 dB +3.00 dB
73.1 dB +3.20 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (3.2 dB).

Value

4

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
40,000 KM Best
35,800 KM -4,200 KM
35,300 KM -4,700 KM
34,300 KM -5,700 KM
33,100 KM -6,900 KM
32,000 KM -8,000 KM
30,700 KM -9,300 KM
30,500 KM -9,500 KM
29,800 KM -10,200 KM
29,500 KM -10,500 KM
29,000 KM -11,000 KM
29,000 KM -11,000 KM
28,300 KM -11,700 KM
28,200 KM -11,800 KM
27,300 KM -12,700 KM
22,400 KM -17,600 KM

The difference between best and worst was 44% (17,600 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1.18 Price/1000 Best
1.3 Price/1000 +0.12 Price/1000
1.68 Price/1000 +0.50 Price/1000
1.74 Price/1000 +0.56 Price/1000
1.86 Price/1000 +0.68 Price/1000
2.02 Price/1000 +0.84 Price/1000
2.03 Price/1000 +0.85 Price/1000
2.07 Price/1000 +0.89 Price/1000
2.16 Price/1000 +0.98 Price/1000
2.19 Price/1000 +1.01 Price/1000
2.31 Price/1000 +1.13 Price/1000
2.33 Price/1000 +1.15 Price/1000
2.34 Price/1000 +1.16 Price/1000
2.42 Price/1000 +1.24 Price/1000
2.48 Price/1000 +1.30 Price/1000
3.26 Price/1000 +2.08 Price/1000

The difference between best and worst was 176.3% (2.08 Price/1000).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.3 l/100km Best £0
5.3 l/100km Best £0
5.4 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.4 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.7 l/100km +0.40 l/100km £110
5.8 l/100km +0.50 l/100km £138

The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (0.5 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 95 L (£138) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TyreResultGap to best
63 mg/km/t Best
72 mg/km/t +9.00 mg/km/t
73 mg/km/t +10.00 mg/km/t
77 mg/km/t +14.00 mg/km/t
79 mg/km/t +16.00 mg/km/t
82 mg/km/t +19.00 mg/km/t
82 mg/km/t +19.00 mg/km/t
82 mg/km/t +19.00 mg/km/t
87 mg/km/t +24.00 mg/km/t
93 mg/km/t +30.00 mg/km/t
95 mg/km/t +32.00 mg/km/t
107 mg/km/t +44.00 mg/km/t
108 mg/km/t +45.00 mg/km/t
110 mg/km/t +47.00 mg/km/t
113 mg/km/t +50.00 mg/km/t
117 mg/km/t +54.00 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 85.7% (54 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking - Concrete
80 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
30 → 0 km/h
Ice Braking
20 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.