Test Charts / AvD
2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R17
- Tyres tested
- 15
- Disciplines
- 6
- Test vehicle
- Audi A3
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 41.7 m | +0.20 m | 9 km/h | |
| 41.8 m | +0.30 m | 11 km/h | |
| 42 m | +0.50 m | 14 km/h | |
| 42.3 m | +0.80 m | 18 km/h | |
| 42.3 m | +0.80 m | 18 km/h | |
| 42.6 m | +1.10 m | 21 km/h | |
| 43.4 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 43.4 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 43.5 m | +2.00 m | 28 km/h | |
| 43.8 m | +2.30 m | 30 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 44.8 m | +3.30 m | 35 km/h | |
| 44.9 m | +3.40 m | 36 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 8.2% (3.4 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Rockblade Icecruiser 1 would still be travelling at 36 km/h when the Toyo Observe EWS1 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
1Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 46.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 47.3 m | +1.20 m | 21 km/h | |
| 47.3 m | +1.20 m | 21 km/h | |
| 47.5 m | +1.40 m | 22 km/h | |
| 47.9 m | +1.80 m | 25 km/h | |
| 47.9 m | +1.80 m | 25 km/h | |
| 48 m | +1.90 m | 26 km/h | |
| 48.5 m | +2.40 m | 29 km/h | |
| 48.8 m | +2.70 m | 31 km/h | |
| 48.8 m | +2.70 m | 31 km/h | |
| 49.3 m | +3.20 m | 33 km/h | |
| 51.1 m | +5.00 m | 41 km/h | |
| 54.9 m | +8.80 m | 52 km/h | |
| 62.8 m | +16.70 m | 67 km/h | |
| 63.9 m | +17.80 m | 69 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 38.6% (17.8 m ≈ 4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Rockblade Icecruiser 1 would still be travelling at 69 km/h when the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow
1Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 24.3 m | +0.20 m | 12 km/h | |
| 24.6 m | +0.50 m | 19 km/h | |
| 24.8 m | +0.70 m | 22 km/h | |
| 24.8 m | +0.70 m | 22 km/h | |
| 25.1 m | +1.00 m | 26 km/h | |
| 25.1 m | +1.00 m | 26 km/h | |
| 25.1 m | +1.00 m | 26 km/h | |
| 25.2 m | +1.10 m | 27 km/h | |
| 25.2 m | +1.10 m | 27 km/h | |
| 25.2 m | +1.10 m | 27 km/h | |
| 25.3 m | +1.20 m | 28 km/h | |
| 25.3 m | +1.20 m | 28 km/h | |
| 25.8 m | +1.70 m | 33 km/h | |
| 26.7 m | +2.60 m | 41 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (2.6 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Toyo Observe EWS1 would still be travelling at 41 km/h when the Rockblade Icecruiser 1 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 54,995 KM | Best | |
| 51,899 KM | -3,096 KM | |
| 45,721 KM | -9,274 KM | |
| 44,171 KM | -10,824 KM | |
| 42,639 KM | -12,356 KM | |
| 42,050 KM | -12,945 KM | |
| 38,824 KM | -16,171 KM | |
| 38,261 KM | -16,734 KM | |
| 38,166 KM | -16,829 KM | |
| 35,972 KM | -19,023 KM | |
| 35,058 KM | -19,937 KM | |
| 34,475 KM | -20,520 KM | |
| 32,868 KM | -22,127 KM | |
| 30,425 KM | -24,570 KM | |
| 27,814 KM | -27,181 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 49.4% (27,181 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.98 Price/1000 | Best | €16.50 | |
| 8.52 Price/1000 | +0.54 Price/1000 | €16.55 | |
| 8.71 Price/1000 | +0.73 Price/1000 | €17.72 | |
| 8.9 Price/1000 | +0.92 Price/1000 | €17.73 | |
| 9.28 Price/1000 | +1.30 Price/1000 | €16.73 | |
| 9.35 Price/1000 | +1.37 Price/1000 | €16.91 | |
| 9.4 Price/1000 | +1.42 Price/1000 | €17.37 | |
| 9.62 Price/1000 | +1.64 Price/1000 | €15.52 | |
| 10.19 Price/1000 | +2.21 Price/1000 | €16.87 | |
| 11.64 Price/1000 | +3.66 Price/1000 | €15.07 | |
| 11.66 Price/1000 | +3.68 Price/1000 | €18.67 | |
| 11.84 Price/1000 | +3.86 Price/1000 | €20.76 | |
| 12.6 Price/1000 | +4.62 Price/1000 | €14.27 | |
| 12.68 Price/1000 | +4.70 Price/1000 | €18.84 | |
| 14.19 Price/1000 | +6.21 Price/1000 | €19.11 |
The difference between best and worst was 77.8% (6.21 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Bridgestone Blizzak 6) works out €260 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.32 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.92 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £36 | |
| 8.23 kg/t | +0.91 kg/t | £55 | |
| 8.53 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | £73 | |
| 8.58 kg/t | +1.26 kg/t | £76 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.27 kg/t | £76 | |
| 8.72 kg/t | +1.40 kg/t | £84 | |
| 8.88 kg/t | +1.56 kg/t | £94 | |
| 8.89 kg/t | +1.57 kg/t | £95 | |
| 9.03 kg/t | +1.71 kg/t | £103 | |
| 9.04 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t | £104 | |
| 9.12 kg/t | +1.80 kg/t | £108 | |
| 9.18 kg/t | +1.86 kg/t | £112 | |
| 9.23 kg/t | +1.91 kg/t | £115 | |
| 9.24 kg/t | +1.92 kg/t | £116 |
The difference between best and worst was 26.2% (1.92 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro uses about 80 L (£116) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17
225/50 R1716 tyres tested
8 of these 15 tyres tested again
2026 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test
205/55 R1611 tyres tested
7 of these 15 tyres tested again
2025 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test
225/45 R178 tyres tested
7 of these 15 tyres tested again

