Menu

Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs Cup 2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 vs 3R vs Toyo R888R

Overall test winnerGoodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3R

It doesn't take much to make me happy, but a Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE at Nelson Ledges with five sets of tyres ranging from treadwear 300 to treadwear 100...

Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs Cup 2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 vs 3R vs Toyo R888R
305/30 R19 / 2021 View full image
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs Cup 2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 vs 3R vs Toyo R888R
Tyres tested
5
Tested size
305/30 R19
Disciplines
2

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

5 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

How the results are weighted

1st

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3R

+Fastest lap and the best subjective rating, with heavy, communicative steering and huge grip once up to temperature.

−Needs to be in its temperature window to give its best.

Read full verdict
2nd

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2

+Second fastest lap, with high grip and easy to drive for a track tyre.

−Understeers earlier than the SuperCar 3 and is only third subjectively.

Read full verdict
3rd

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3

+Second-best subjective rating, with quick, direct, well-weighted steering, and third fastest despite being a road and track tyre.

−Slower than the Cup 2 over a lap.

Read full verdict
4th

Toyo R888 R

+Direct, well-weighted steering below the limit.

−Lowest subjective rating: the balance moves around at the limit with little feedback and it oversteers quickly. Only fourth over a lap and noisy at speed.

Read full verdict
5th

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

+Close to the R888R over a lap despite being the most road-focused tyre, with road-level comfort.

−Slowest lap, with the usual delay in steering response and light, uncommunicative steering.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs Cup 2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 vs 3R vs Toyo R888R · 305/30 R19

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Show full testing methodology

Score Weighting

Weights express the scoring priorities, not how much each discipline actually changed the finishing order. The size of the performance gaps matters too. Category weights contribute to the overall score. Within each category, discipline weights divide that category’s share. Published finishing positions also need to be read alongside the editorial verdict.

TestWithin categoryShare of overall score
Dry · 100%
Dry Handling83%83%
Subj. Dry Handling17%17%

Our standard methods

The conditions above are recorded for this test. The descriptions below explain our standard procedures; measurement windows and run counts can vary by test.

Dry Handling

For dry handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible so I can assess the tyre's natural balance, transient response, and limit behaviour without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tyre set, depending on the circuit, tyre type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tyres so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable. For more track-focused products, I also do endurance testing, which is a set number of laps at race pace to determine tire wear patterns and heat resistance over longer driving.

Subj. Dry Handling

I also carry out a structured subjective handling assessment at the limit of adhesion on a dedicated dry handling circuit. I score steering precision, steering response, turn-in behaviour, mid-corner balance, corner-exit traction, breakaway characteristics, and overall confidence using a standardised 1–10 scale used consistently across my testing. The final assessment combines numeric scoring with written technical commentary. I complete familiarisation laps on the control tyre before evaluating each candidate.

It doesn't take much to make me happy, but a Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE at Nelson Ledges with five sets of tyres ranging from treadwear 300 to treadwear 100... well that's a very easy place to be happy.

The reason for this test was to see if a lower treadwear value, which is a number the American Uniform Tyre Quality Grade (UTQG) standards body assign to a tyre based on a basic wear test, really does mean more grip, but it turned out to be a fascinating insight into some of the big hitting tyres used on track in North America.

The surprise of the show was the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3. Sadly this tyre isn't available in Europe, and sits somewhere between the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S and Cup 2. Dynamically it's outstanding for its sector, with crisp steering and great feedback, and good grip to match, finishing just a little slower than the Cup 2.

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, which is a UUHP road tyre, almost matched the one lap pace of the Toyo R888R, which is either very good for the Michelin or very bad for the Toyo. The internet seems to love the R888R, so perhaps it works better in smaller sizes on lighter cars, but on this 305/30 R19 it was a difficult tyre at the limit. If you drove at 9/10th, it felt great, but when you tried to extract the final pace from the tyre is gave very poor feedback and seemingly random grip.

As for the original question, does a lower treadwear rating mean more grip, if we ignore the Toyo yes it does, but thanks to the Toyo, in this test, it does not.

Watch the video below for the full details.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs Cup 2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 vs 3R vs Toyo R888R

Test Data

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.44 s Best
71.14 s +0.70 s
71.77 s +1.33 s
72.25 s +1.81 s
72.78 s +2.34 s

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (2.34 s).

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9.5 Points -0.50 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
8.5 Points -1.50 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 20% (2 Points).

Results

Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs Cup 2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 vs 3R vs Toyo R888RWatch the full video of this test on YouTube Watch on YouTube

1st

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3R

305/30 R19
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3R
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 R offers extremely high levels of grip, even compared to the Cup 2. The steering is heavy, offering excellent feedback and a high speed of direction change. When the tyres are in their operating temperature window, the grip is unrivaled in this test, and it gives you the ability to adjust your lines at the limit of grip. Extremely fast track tyre.
All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 570.44 sBest in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 510 PointsBest in this discipline
2nd

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2

305/30 R19
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 performs as expected from the Cup 2, it offers high levels of grip and is very easy to drive for a track tyre, however it breaks into understeer earlier than the SuperCar 3.
All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry HandlingLower is better2nd / 571.14 s+0.70 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 59 Points-1.00 Points
3rd

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3

305/30 R19
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 is a very impressive road / track hybrid tyre. The steering is well weighted, quick and direct, offering good feedback and sportier levels of driving than even the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2. The grip levels are very high, with the lap time a second ahead of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. This is an outstanding road tyre on track, and the surprise of the test for me.
All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 571.77 s+1.33 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 59.5 Points-0.50 Points
4th

Toyo R888 R

305/30 R19
Toyo R888 R
The Toyo R888R is a difficult tyre to drive at the very limit. At 8/10th the tyre feels sporty with direct steering and a nice weighting, however when you get to the limit the tyres balance moves around without much feedback, and once past the limit of grip is oversteers very quickly. The tyre also produces a lot of tread pattern noise at speed.
All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry HandlingLower is better4th / 572.25 s+1.81 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 58 Points-2.00 Points
5th

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

305/30 R19
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Considering the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is the most road focused tyre in this track test, it was very impressive. There is the usual 4S delay to the steering, especially compared to the SuperCar 3, and the steering is light and non communicative. However this would be the best tyre in the wet, and offers road levels of comfort. Impressive all round ability.
All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry HandlingLower is better5th / 572.78 s+2.34 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 58.5 Points-1.50 Points

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.