Menu
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 View Gallery (2)
235-255/50-60 R17-19 5 sizes 2008 Winter rated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 is a Ultra High Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

7.1
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
64%
Road Feedback
78%
Handling
78%
Wear
80%
Comfort
64%
Buy again
62%
Snow Grip
90%
Ice Grip
65%
5 Reviews
75% Average
313,510 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 7th)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

Winter Premium
BETA
7.1 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2010
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 74.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.07
History Points: 9
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test Auto Bild 2010 215/65 r16 7/8 0 metrics
1
Tests
7th
Average
7th
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
7th/8
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
235/60 R17 102 H E D 72
18 inch
255/55 R18 109 H XL D C 71
19 inch
255/50 R19 107 H XL D E 73
255/50 R19 107 V XL D E 73
235/50 R19 99 H D D 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 >>

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews

Given 66% while driving a Mercedes Benz MB GLK 220 CDI 4 matic (235/60 R17) on a combination of roads for 10 average miles
Maybe my sample isn't representative to everybody. Where i live, tyres can be legaly sold as new tyres if they are up to 3 years old. (not used, but stored for that time)
And my sample was slightly over 3 years when i got them. The tyreshop then reduced the price when i noticed it.
So mine were already 3 years and a few months old when they were mounted. (due to aging the rubber might have gotten a little harder.
Positive: -low noise in dry weather, -nice to drive in the dry, almost sporty feel, -comfortable, -ok in the snow,- cost free tyre warranty from the manufacturer (for flats ect.)- low wear (but i had low wear with all tyres on that car).
Negative: -noisy on wet roads (very noticable whisteling above 60 kph), -wet grip was nowhere near to what my previous set of Dunlop winter tyres had.
-ice grip very far from my previous set of Dunlops.
The car had lot's of grip, and only on ice or snow with a lot of effort was i able to get the stability control to flash before i had these Bridgestones. But with these even when driving rather carefully on ice the stability flashed and the tyres slipped.
And i managed a 4wheel power slide on a wet slimy road. Turning from a standstill and flooring it made the car do that. Despite only having a 4cyl Diesel and permanend awd in a 2000kg car. Easy to control, but my previous winter tyres did not let go of the grip in the same situation.
Used the tyres for 2 winters and one summer, where i changed the car.
October 23, 2024
Given 29% while driving a BMW X5 3.0d Sport (250/55 R19 V) on mostly country roads for 1,500 average miles
Hi. First time tried this tyre, extremly noisy. Wet road/bit cold is very slippery. Dry is is excellent, but for winter this tyre is risk of life.
January 13, 2020
Initial Impressions Review
Given 100% while driving a Kia Motors Sportage (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 270,000 average miles
Ultra grip on any surface, where any other tire skids, blizzak lm25 climbs like on dry land. After 15 years, I still use them occasionally, I take off the new ones 2 years ago and drive without problems with blizzaklm25 in bad conditions. The rubber looks like new on the sidewalls, the tread is worn evenly, only a few superficial cuts from the tram track.
December 28, 2025

How would you rate the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews

Given 91% while driving a Subaru Forester 2.0 XT (215/60 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 17,000 spirited miles
Extremely well behaving winter tires for Subaru Forester. Driving these for over 25,000 km during winter months in varieties of roads and conditions - dry, wet, snow and mixed. The tires hold their job with great control and stability, making them easy recommendation as top winter tires.
March 31, 2015
Rate the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4