Menu
Sailun Atrezzo Eco View Gallery (1)
145-205/50-80 R13-15 54 sizes

Sailun Atrezzo Eco

Sailun Tyres Touring Summer

The Sailun Atrezzo Eco is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
68%
Wet Grip
53%
Road Feedback
78%
Handling
75%
Wear
87%
Comfort
85%
Buy again
73%
5 Reviews
74% Average
31,748 miles driven
Sailun Atrezzo Eco

Sailun Atrezzo Eco

Summer Economy
BETA
6.7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 15 Jun 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 73.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.04
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Sailun Atrezzo Eco

Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T D B 70
155/80R13 79 T D B 69
14 inch
165/70R14 81 T D B 70
165/70R14 85 T XL D B 70
185/70R14 88 T D B 70
185/70R14 88 H D B 70
175/65R14 82 T D B 70
175/65R14 82 H D B 70
175/65R14 86 T XL C B 70
185/60R14 82 H D B 70
185/60R14 82 H D B 70
185/70R14 88 H D B 70
175/65R14 82 H D B 70
185/70R14 88 T C B 69
175/65R14 82 T C B 69
185/60R14 82 H D B 69
165/70R14 81 T D B 69
175/65R14 82 H D B 69
175/65R14 86 T XL C B 69
165/70R14 85 T XL D B 69
185/70R14 88 H D B 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Sailun Atrezzo Eco >>

Questions and Answers for the Sailun Atrezzo Eco

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Sailun Atrezzo Eco. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Top 3 Sailun Atrezzo Eco Reviews

Given 86% while driving a Honda Civic (185/70 R14) on a combination of roads for 500 spirited miles
Still too new to comment on wear, replaced all 4 Michelin Saver XM with Sailun Atrezzo Eco tires 500km ago, so far there is a noticeable reduction in road noise and these feel more comfortable to drive on. Best of all the price is very attractive compared to current Michelins
Helpful 673
August 7, 2024
Given 60% while driving a Peugeot 206 1.1 (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 13,000 average miles
I ordered a set of Autogreen tyres, the garage then couldn't supply them on the day do gave me these "more expensive" tyres, what a mistake to have taken them. They are incredibly long lasting and OK in warm and dry. Once below about 10 degrees they have poor levels of stopping ability and dire wet weather abilities, even given they are summer tyres. There is no way that the compound can be the same as when EU testing happened as they are certainly not B standard in the wet, it's a bit like driving on slush. I am a relatively relaxed and sedate driver in a 60hp car so this is not me driving like a fool. Despite having tonnes of rubber left I binned these off today, having aquaplaned in moderate rain in town and loosing traction whenever any moisture is in the about. Cheaper to replace the tyres than the car!
Helpful 856
November 11, 2023
Given 66% while driving a Toyota Probox Wagon (165/80 R13) on a combination of roads for 17,000 average miles
currently using the tyres on both my Toyota Probox cars, one car has a 2nd set, it's a budget tyre with suprisingly good mileage , good all round preformance & value for it's price
Helpful 927
February 15, 2023

Which tyres do you drive?

Researching the Sailun Atrezzo Eco? Rate the tyres you actually drive — and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Sailun Atrezzo Eco?
I drive something else — review any tyre →
106 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Sailun Atrezzo Eco Reviews

Smart fortwo passion (145/65 R15 T) on mostly town for 1,148 easy going miles
Didn't know how to rate these tyres on a 1-10 basis so left all categories as NA. I've had them fitted to the front of my car for just over a year now and have had no problems with them. Don't know what else to say really they are just tyres and keep the car rolling on the ground.
Helpful 994
June 6, 2018
Given 83% while driving a MINI ONE (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 100 easy going miles
I had 4 Sailun Atrezzo Eco tyres fitted to my Mini Hatch.I comparison to the original Michelin Energy Saver tyres they give a much better ride and the steering feel is fantastic.The ultimate level of grip might be less but steering feel and ride quality are much more valuable to me.
Helpful 696
September 6, 2016
Which tyres do you drive?
Driving the Sailun Atrezzo Eco?
No — review a different tyre →
Rate your tyres