Menu
Westlake ZuperAce Z 007 View Gallery (2)

Westlake ZuperAce Z 007

Westlake Tyres Touring Summer

The Westlake ZuperAce Z 007 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.6
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
87%
Road Feedback
90%
Handling
85%
Wear
85%
Comfort
87%
Buy again
90%
6 Reviews
87% Average
166,000 miles driven
Westlake ZuperAce Z 007

Westlake ZuperAce Z 007

Summer Budget
BETA
7.6 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 87.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.28
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Westlake ZuperAce Z 007

Questions and Answers for the Westlake ZuperAce Z 007

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Westlake ZuperAce Z 007. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Westlake ZuperAce Z 007 Reviews

Given 93% while driving a Peugeot 3008 GT line 2.0 Blue HDI (235/50 R19) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
I drive fast and have mounted only Michelins for the last 15 years, so I expect a quite high standard for grip and comfort.
Being these my first Chinese tires purchase I was very reluctant. So far I'm in love with the performance, specially given that I paid just 35% of the cost of a touring tire from Michelin, Continental or Bridgestone, like the Turanza T005 I can compare them to. The grip, noise, comfort, and looks are on par, and at least the UTQG specs indicate that wear should be even superior. So far, even if they were to die at 15000 miles (been there with Michelin), I would buy them again... hands down, and they have barely worn yet.
Westlake ZuperAce Z 007 image
Ask a question | Helpful 736
June 3, 2025
Given 89% while driving a Peugeot 3008 1,5 Diesel (225/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 18,000 average miles
These Westlake ZuperAce Z 007 tyres were on the car (2017 Peugeot 3008 1.6 Diesel) when I bought it 18 months ago and they were put on by the garage when the car was put up for sale. I didn't recognise the brand so I thought I would soon be changing them as they were obviously budget tyres. However, I couldn't have been more wrong. They were comfortable, quiet and I really had no problem with grip either in the wet or dry. They also seemed to cope well in standing water. I've now done 18000 miles and I reckon I'll just about get another 2000 miles from them. I would like to get a bit more than 20000 miles from tyres as I'm not a boy racer anymore, but the fact that they only cost just over half the price of a decent premium tyre I'll be going for them again very shortly.
Ask a question | Helpful 930
November 8, 2024
Given 90% while driving a Lexus UX (225/50 R18) on mostly town for 1,000 easy going miles
Have these on my UX. Seem fine with good ratings.
Ask a question | Helpful 810
February 1, 2025
Have you driven on the Westlake ZuperAce Z 007 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Westlake ZuperAce Z 007? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Westlake ZuperAce Z 007 >

Latest Westlake ZuperAce Z 007 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a BMW 420d (255/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
I’ve always fitted Bridgestone and this is the first time trying Westlake ZuperAce z-007. I can hardly tell the difference in any way except the price. I plan to fit Westlake now every time I want new tires.
Ask a question | Helpful 110
December 21, 2025
Given 94% while driving a Lexus RX300 (235/55 R20) on mostly country roads for 120,000 average miles
Comfortable driving with fair prices
Ask a question | Helpful 805
February 15, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!