Menu
Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 View Gallery (3)
205-315/30-55 R16-20 83 sizes 2022

Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2

The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.4
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
79%
Road Feedback
71%
Handling
67%
Wear
56%
Comfort
74%
Buy again
81%
8 Reviews
74% Average
42,000 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 11th)
Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2

Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2

Summer Economy
BETA
7.4 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
77.1
0.29x / 3 tests
Dry
76.6
1.8x / 4 tests
Wet
74.6
2x / 10 tests
Value
70.9
0.38x / 8 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
85.9
2 tests
Braking
72.4
7 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2024 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 74.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.39
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 10/21 12 metrics
2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 9/52 2 metrics
2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 13/16 11 metrics
3
Tests
11th
Average
9th
Best
13th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
9th/52
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 from China surprised testers with good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, secure handling, and pleasantly quiet rolling noise. It performed admirably in the wet handling test, achieving better times than some established premium brands. The main drawback was significantly restricted mileage of just 25,500 kilometers, which impacted its overall cost-effectiveness despite the low purchase price of €288. Despite this limitation, its surprisingly good performance in safety-related tests earned it a "satisfactory" rating.
2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
215/55 R17 • 2024
13th/16
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 achieves only a satisfactory rating in driving safety, providing just adequate steering feedback on dry roads and not exceeding a satisfactory rating in handling at the limit. The insufficient feedback affects the ability to accurately adjust the steering for curves, leading to a tendency for the vehicle to oversteer during sudden maneuvers. However, it does receive a clearly good rating in braking distance. Overall, its performance on dry roads is rated as satisfactory. On wet surfaces, the Sailun narrowly misses a good rating in both braking and aquaplaning, with only its wet handling performance being rated as just good. Thus, it achieves an overall satisfactory rating on wet roads. Environmentally, the Sailun also receives a satisfactory rating, with both its projected mileage and wear deemed satisfactory, albeit the latter just barely. It scores a good rating in efficiency due to low fuel consumption and a relatively low weight. However, the sustainability of this tyre, produced in China, is rated as adequate.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
205/50R17 93 W XL C A 69
215/45R17 91 Y XL C A 69
205/50R17 93 W XL C A 69
215/45R17 91 Y XL C A 69
225/45R17 94 Y XL D C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 >>

Questions and Answers for the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 Reviews

Given 78% while driving a Volkswagen Passat (245/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 2,000 easy going miles
Visually well-made, with no balancing issues and no shaking at highway speeds. The tires perform well on both dry and wet surfaces. The only downside is that they are quite stiff—there was noticeable bumping when new, but it reduced after the break-in period. Overall, these are excellent tires for the price, offering great value for money. I'm quite pleased with them.
Ask a question | Helpful 820
June 11, 2025
Given 66% while driving a Fiat Grande Punto TJet (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Part 2 of the review. I've run the tyres approximately 5000 km's. Car got remapped to 183 hp and 296 N/m, the tyres still grip very well in the dry. However they struggle for traction in damp conditions, but for a FWD car without LSD it's normal.
However, when I changed to the winter tyres, the tread on the front tyres is visibly less than on the rears, I'm estimating 3 or 3.5 mm until they get at the bars. I didn't do any burnouts, but I drove them spiritedly. Next summer I'll rotate them and I think 2025 will be their last year. Very good tyres for the money, but if you drive them hard, I don't think they'll last 20.000 Km.
I'm thinking to get some Toyo Proxes Sport 2, Kumho Ecsta PS71 or Maxxis Victra Sport 5.
December 12, 2024
Given 76% while driving a Opel Astra J GTC (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Grip is really good. Handling is terrible, but it is my fault I put it on opel astra GTC
August 20, 2025
Have you driven on the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 >

Latest Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 84% while driving a Audi A4 3.0 litre TDI S Line Quattro (255/35 R18) on for 10,000 miles
Very quiet tires, very nice comfort, real ok handling - for the price, best on market!
February 1, 2026
Given 59% while driving a Skoda Octavia (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
I bought a used Skoda Octavia MK4 last summer. The car came with seemingly brand new Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 tyres in 225/50/17 size and XL load rating.
I have now reached the end of useful life for those tyres and review my experience with them.

The tyres have excellent grip in braking and handling on dry surfaces. I rarely managed to lose traction and if that happened I really needed to thrash on them.
I also rate wet grip as excellent.
The tyres were also comfortable and absorbed bumps quite nicely. Noise was not noticeable until the end of the tyre life, the worn down rear tyres started humming a little of smooth road surfaces. Comfort was ok, but I rated comfort down due to the next paragraph.

Handling wise the tyres are not that good. The fact that they don't lose grip is great but they do not give good confidence since the sidewalls are absolutely too soft. The car acted in such a way I was already considering upgrading shocks and springs since it handled like a boat. Bumpy roads and corners felt downrights scary. So I adjusted my speeds and took everything nice and slow, like a grandpa going to church on Sunday.

Luckily the tyres wore out and I replaced them with Kumho Ecsta PS72 tyres. Wow, what a difference. I do not need to change suspension after all, but that's a story for a different review.

Wear... I have never seen tyres wear out so quickly. I mention buying a used car with seemingly brand new tyres. I do not know the mileage these tyres travelled before me but I only got 16 353 kilometres out of these tyres over 2 summer seasons. They can not have had travelled more than few thousand miles, they did look absolutely brand new. After the first summer season tyres were rotated to allow for more even wear. This spring as summer tyres were installed they had evenly 4.5-5mm of tread left. This got worn down to legal limit in 8622 km of calm easy driving. The ones that were more worn were REARs. Front tyres still had some mileage left but I never unmatch my tyres. Due to the quick wear and scary wallowy handling I did not want to purchase these tyres again.

So there we go. Decent tyres, somewhat okay price ( new Kumhos were acutally same price as Sailuns in my area ) but they wear out very quickly.
September 17, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 77% while driving a Fiat Grande Punto TJet (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
This is my last review on these tyres. I drove these tyres quite a lot recently, had some trackdays and a roadtrip around some very nice mountain roads, with dry and wet weather aswell.

Tyres are still performing very well, especially on dry weather. I had a trackday session at the local karting track (1.2 km total lap length), and I've absolutely tortured the front tyres. I didn't manage the tyre pressure prior so I had about 2.3 bars cold which was way too much, it was my first time on the track. Track was hot and ambient temperature was hot aswell.

On the karting track, the tyres got way too hot, and felt very greasy after 2-3 laps, with non existent feedback, understeer and visible tyre graining. I've also driven some laps on a proper car circuit and they behaved a lot better, as the tyres didn't get as hot. When they are at the proper temperature, they have very good grip, and the feedback is quite good. My car is a Fiat Grande Punto T-Jet with over 180 hp and 300 N/m torque, without an LSD (which is understeer heaven).

On wet weather however, lateral grip is not great. Braking is very good, aquaplaning decent, but lateral grip it's not really great. I've tested this prior to going to the trackdays, so the tyres were not grained in any way. The tyres do not inspire confidence when turning in wet. They give the feeling that they'll snap out of traction very sudden. But this is if you push them, and try to drive them a bit faster in wet. If you're conservative, they are very good.

Sailun is the only chinese tyre manufacturer from what I know, that's FIA certified and provided tyres for F4 Chinese and TCR Asia. It seems that the motorsport R&D is put to very good use on the road tyres. These are the absolute best budget UHP tyres that you can get. If you're looking for a best bang for the buck, this is the tyre for you.

For me personally, I would buy them again, for sure. The next set however it's going to be Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, can't wait for Jon's review on those.
September 5, 2025
Given 83% while driving a Citroën C3 Aircross SUV (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 5,000 average miles
Great tyre for the price.
August 14, 2025
Given 82% while driving a Fiat Grande Punto TJet (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I got a deal on a set of Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 as I was trying to find the best bang for the buck summer tyre. I've read through tons and tons of reviews here, and watched lots of videos. I was especially interested in a tyre that was tested by ADAC. I purely got them as the wet braking distance in the wet is not that far off a Michelin. I got them mid-June 2024, now early September 2024. I drove them approximately 2000-2500 km's.

They are very, very good, especially on dry weather, they have a lot of grip and the handling is very precise. I drove them hard on some twisty roads and they handle fantastic, road feedback is good. I drive a tuned 1.4 T-Jet Fiat Grande Punto with around 150 hp.

On wet they are fine, I had no issues on wet. However I'm driving slower and very cautiously on wet weather. They behave really good. I think from the budget Chinese made tyres, Sailun are the best choice you could get.
September 4, 2024