- Honda Civic 1.8 VTEC Sport
- 215/50 R17 W
- 50,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 Owner Reviews
Review this tyreWhat owners say summarised from 38 reviews
The Toyo NanoEnergy 3 receives mostly favourable owner reviews, with dry grip, ride comfort, quiet running and tread life the clearest strengths. Mid-life and end-of-life accounts repeatedly support good wear, although a few describe more noise or reduced grip later on. Wet grip is much more divided, with eleven favourable mentions against eight complaints, so confidence in rain is less consistent than dry performance. Wet braking is a particular reservation, criticised in around one in six reviews, while a smaller group reports weak wet handling. Steering feedback also divides opinion, leaving comfort and everyday dry use better supported than sharp responses or dependable wet stopping.
What owners mention most counted across 37 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 42 ratings
- Owner score 77%
- Wear 83%
- Dry Grip 83%
- Comfort 81%
- Handling 76%
- Road Feedback 74%
- Wet Grip 67%
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 Reviews - Page 3
- Honda Civic
- 175/70 R13 T
- 4,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Easy Going
- Ford Focus MK2 2.0 TDCI Sedan
- 205/55 R16
- 18,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
I almost crash my car multiple times due to the tyre understeer on a wet road. I would never buy this tyre again, at least for the car I am driving, for a lighter car might suit.
The tyre sidewall isn't stiff enough therefore contribute some degree of body roll as well.
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Toyo NanoEnergy 3? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Mazda Mazda2
- 195/55 R16
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
The initial impression after fitted it is the tyre felt soft on the side wall ,quite and comfortable; but i lose the sharp turn in of my Mazda 2 ! The steering is not as sharp as it used to be especially during hard cornering , you can felt the tyre wall flex abit. I am slightly disappointed until i found out that the tyre shop under-inflate my tyre on all 4 side, immediately i went to inflate it to OEM recommendation 250 kpa (front) 230kpa (rear) .
Guess what , my car back to how it should handle and now I am pretty happy with it !!
The only thing i dislike is the moderate wet braking compared to the oem Dunlop.
- Audi A4
- 205/55 R16 H
- 15 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Only thing I will say is that while on the front of the car the tyres do seem to be wearing a bit faster than I would like, but my A4 is a front wheel drive and I do like tend to push through the corners a bit faster so I do ask quite a bit of them.
Overall a great tyre and I would consider fitting another set of the same to my second car when the time comes.
- Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2.0 MIVEC (MAN)
- 225/45 R17
- 25,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Dry Grip:- Fantastic. Similar to the first day fitted.
Wet Grip:- Pay attention to the tyre pressure. Drop the tyres a a few PSI's and it handles the wets very well.
Road Feedback:- A bit numb. But it is a touring tyre after all. It does tell you when it lets go albeit slowly
Handling:- It lets go progressively at the dry and wet. Very predictable
Wear:- Extremely well! Easily around 1.5cm's of thread left. I do rotate the tyres fairly regularly.
Comfort:- I've begun to find the tyre to much louder and crashier than before, to the point that I will be contemplating to have them swapped for 2 pairs of Kumho Ventus Primes (As recommended by tyre review). Again this is after 2 years of hot equatorial climates with rather rough roads in south east asia.
- Mazda 5
- 205/55 R16 H
- 35,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- BMW 325 coupe
- 225/45 R17
- 4,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Spirited
- Suzuki Swift
- 195/50 R15 V
- 10,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Spirited
- Peugeot 1.4 HDi
- 185/65 R15 H
- 45,000 miles
- Track
- Average
- Mitsubishi mirage dohc
- 185/65 R14 T
- 5,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Spirited
Initial review - I taught I had made a terrible mistake! Driving in Jan/Feb when the weather is pretty cold and the roads are constantly wet the handling was absolutely awful, the car would over steer at any sort of speed going into roundabouts and just didn't inspire confidence whatsoever! Fast forward about month and 1000kms or so later they were getting a little less twitchy in wet conditions and another couple of months and another few thousand kms more and they seemed to bed right in. Now it's summer and pretty much always warm with the occasional rain shower I have the upmost confidence in them wet or dry, the only flaw I can find now is they tend to squeal like a pig going to slaughter if pushed hard in the dry but they never seem to break traction.
So overall I'm very pleased with them for the price and apart from the sort of "break in" period and the squealing when pushed hard in the dry I can't really complain. The ride quality is good if somewhat a little floaty but they are a 65 profile tyre after all but the road noise is nowhere near as bad as the T1R or R888 which I've used in the past. Fuel economy seems to have dropped slightly but maybe that's just me driving harder as I have the confidence to push the car on a bit.
So far I've done about 5000kms and there doesn't seem to be any sign of wear but I'll see if that changes by the end of the summer after some more spirited driving.
Overall I'd give them a 7.5/10
- Kia Motors Cerato Forte
- 215/50 R17 V
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tyre
All tyre testsThe latest Tyre Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tyres for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tyres Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 →
Summer Tyres
All Season Tyres
Winter Tyres
SUV and All Terrain Tyres
Track Tyres
Which tyres do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tyres.

