Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Giti GitiWinterW2
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 7 times and the GitiWinterW2 once. The Krisalp HP3 was stronger in dry, snow, ice, comfort and value, the GitiWinterW2 in wet.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 8 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Krisalp HP3
GitiWinterW2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Krisalp HP3
GitiWinterW2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Krisalp HP3 | Gap | GitiWinterW2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 44.47 | 0.4% | 44.67 | 2-1 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 109.6 | 0.1% | 109.5 | 2-0 |
| Wet GitiWinterW2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 42.11 | 2.6% | 43.14 | 5-3 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 40.7 | 1.7% | 40 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 76 | 0.4% | 76.32 | 1-1 |
| Wet Circle (m/s) | 2.6 | 19.2% | 3.1 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle (s) | 12.72 | 1% | 12.59 | 0-2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 84.63 | 0.2% | 84.33 | 2-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.17 | 1.7% | 3.23 | 0-2 |
| Snow Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 26.35 | 3.1% | 27.11 | 6-2 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,686 | 4% | 2,590 | 2-1 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 58.45 | 1.8% | 57.55 | 1-1 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.35 | 0.1% | 3.34 | 1-1 |
| Ice Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking m | 16.8 | 5.6% | 17.8 | 1-0 |
| Comfort Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 72.2 | 0.3 dB | 71.9 | 2-1 |
| Value Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 49,577 | 4.2% | 47,737 | 1-2 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.28 | 11.3% | 9.37 | 2-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.7 | 1.7% | 5.8 | 1-0 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 64 | 25.6% | 86 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 8 tests, 2021 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Krisalp HP3 | Field | GitiWinterW2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P5 of 20 | P12 of 20 | |
| 2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets | P7 of 50 | P18 of 50 | |
| 2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets! | P12 of 51 | P24 of 51 | |
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | P7 of 31 | P16 of 31 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P8 of 20 | P14 of 20 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | P16 of 55 | P12 of 55 | |
| 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test | P4 of 54 | P28 of 54 | |
| 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P11 of 50 | P28 of 50 |
Krisalp HP3 vs GitiWinterW2: your questions
Is the Kleber Krisalp HP3 or the Giti GitiWinterW2 the better tyre?
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 7 times and the GitiWinterW2 once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Krisalp HP3 scores 8.1 and the GitiWinterW2 7.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Krisalp HP3 or the GitiWinterW2?
The GitiWinterW2 led 11 of the 19 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 1.7% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Krisalp HP3 led 4 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Krisalp HP3 led 10 of the 15 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.1% shorter on snow across 8 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Krisalp HP3 had 11.3% lower rolling resistance (2 tests); the GitiWinterW2 lasted 4.2% longer in the wear tests (3 tests). Owners rate wear 8.5/10 for the Krisalp HP3 and 6/10 for the GitiWinterW2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.8/10 for the Krisalp HP3 and 10/10 for the GitiWinterW2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Krisalp HP3 83% from 37 reviews and the GitiWinterW2 86% from 1.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the two were priced within 1% of each other on average.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Krisalp HP3 is made in 75 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the GitiWinterW2 in 57 (13 to 21 inch). 42 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Krisalp HP3 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the GitiWinterW2 B and D.
Which is the newer tyre?
The GitiWinterW2 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Krisalp HP3 in 2016. The Krisalp HP3 replaced the Kleber Krisalp HP2. The GitiWinterW2 replaced the Giti GitiWinterW1.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Barum Polaris 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
2-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-10 in 15 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
13-5 in 20 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
4-18 in 22 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
8-1 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.