Menu

Test Charts / Auto Centrum

2017 AC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
185/65 R15
Tyres tested
8
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
27.76 m Best
28.31 m +0.55 m
29.13 m +1.37 m
29.59 m +1.83 m
30.11 m +2.35 m
30.23 m +2.47 m
30.56 m +2.80 m
31.31 m +3.55 m

The difference between best and worst was 12.8% (3.55 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
29.9 m Best
30.24 m +0.34 m
31.34 m +1.44 m
32.62 m +2.72 m
32.67 m +2.77 m
32.85 m +2.95 m
37.01 m +7.11 m
39.65 m +9.75 m

The difference between best and worst was 32.6% (9.75 m ≈ 2.2 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
13.8 s Best
14 s +0.20 s
14 s +0.20 s
14 s +0.20 s
14.1 s +0.30 s
14.2 s +0.40 s
14.8 s +1.00 s
15.1 s +1.30 s

The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (1.3 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
88.8 km/h Best
85.1 km/h -3.70 km/h
84.9 km/h -3.90 km/h
84.7 km/h -4.10 km/h
83.2 km/h -5.60 km/h
79.9 km/h -8.90 km/h
77.3 km/h -11.50 km/h
75.1 km/h -13.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (13.7 Km/H).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
15.79 m Best
16.06 m +0.27 m
16.16 m +0.37 m
16.25 m +0.46 m
16.33 m +0.54 m
16.34 m +0.55 m
16.81 m +1.02 m
16.97 m +1.18 m

The difference between best and worst was 7.5% (1.18 m).

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
4.82 s Best
4.86 s +0.04 s
4.95 s +0.13 s
4.96 s +0.14 s
5.04 s +0.22 s
5.06 s +0.24 s
5.18 s +0.36 s
5.43 s +0.61 s

The difference between best and worst was 12.7% (0.61 s).

Ice

3

Ice Braking

Ice braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
19.51 m Best
21.23 m +1.72 m
21.6 m +2.09 m
21.81 m +2.30 m
22.44 m +2.93 m
22.47 m +2.96 m
22.85 m +3.34 m
23.76 m +4.25 m

The difference between best and worst was 21.8% (4.25 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).

Ice Traction

Ice acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Ice Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
6.49 s Best
6.57 s +0.08 s
7.02 s +0.53 s
7.03 s +0.54 s
7.12 s +0.63 s
7.32 s +0.83 s
7.33 s +0.84 s
8.23 s +1.74 s

The difference between best and worst was 26.8% (1.74 s).

Ice Handling

Ice handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Ice Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
25.8 s Best
27.4 s +1.60 s
28.2 s +2.40 s
29.8 s +4.00 s
29.8 s +4.00 s
30 s +4.20 s
30.1 s +4.30 s
30.2 s +4.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 17.1% (4.4 s).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.99 kg/t Best £0
8.12 kg/t +0.13 kg/t £7
8.26 kg/t +0.27 kg/t £15
8.29 kg/t +0.30 kg/t £17
8.81 kg/t +0.82 kg/t £45
8.87 kg/t +0.88 kg/t £49
8.95 kg/t +0.96 kg/t £53
9.07 kg/t +1.08 kg/t £60

The difference between best and worst was 13.5% (1.08 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Michelin Alpin A4 uses about 41 L (£60) more fuel than the Debica Frigo 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.