Test Charts / Auto Centrum
2017 AC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 185/65 R15
- Tyres tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 27.76 m | Best | |
| 28.31 m | +0.55 m | |
| 29.13 m | +1.37 m | |
| 29.59 m | +1.83 m | |
| 30.11 m | +2.35 m | |
| 30.23 m | +2.47 m | |
| 30.56 m | +2.80 m | |
| 31.31 m | +3.55 m |
The difference between best and worst was 12.8% (3.55 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29.9 m | Best | |
| 30.24 m | +0.34 m | |
| 31.34 m | +1.44 m | |
| 32.62 m | +2.72 m | |
| 32.67 m | +2.77 m | |
| 32.85 m | +2.95 m | |
| 37.01 m | +7.11 m | |
| 39.65 m | +9.75 m |
The difference between best and worst was 32.6% (9.75 m ≈ 2.2 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 13.8 s | Best | |
| 14 s | +0.20 s | |
| 14 s | +0.20 s | |
| 14 s | +0.20 s | |
| 14.1 s | +0.30 s | |
| 14.2 s | +0.40 s | |
| 14.8 s | +1.00 s | |
| 15.1 s | +1.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (1.3 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 88.8 km/h | Best | |
| 85.1 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 84.9 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 84.7 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 83.2 km/h | -5.60 km/h | |
| 79.9 km/h | -8.90 km/h | |
| 77.3 km/h | -11.50 km/h | |
| 75.1 km/h | -13.70 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (13.7 Km/H).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 15.79 m | Best | |
| 16.06 m | +0.27 m | |
| 16.16 m | +0.37 m | |
| 16.25 m | +0.46 m | |
| 16.33 m | +0.54 m | |
| 16.34 m | +0.55 m | |
| 16.81 m | +1.02 m | |
| 16.97 m | +1.18 m |
The difference between best and worst was 7.5% (1.18 m).
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.82 s | Best | |
| 4.86 s | +0.04 s | |
| 4.95 s | +0.13 s | |
| 4.96 s | +0.14 s | |
| 5.04 s | +0.22 s | |
| 5.06 s | +0.24 s | |
| 5.18 s | +0.36 s | |
| 5.43 s | +0.61 s |
The difference between best and worst was 12.7% (0.61 s).
Ice
3Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 19.51 m | Best | |
| 21.23 m | +1.72 m | |
| 21.6 m | +2.09 m | |
| 21.81 m | +2.30 m | |
| 22.44 m | +2.93 m | |
| 22.47 m | +2.96 m | |
| 22.85 m | +3.34 m | |
| 23.76 m | +4.25 m |
The difference between best and worst was 21.8% (4.25 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).
Ice Traction
Ice acceleration time
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 6.49 s | Best | |
| 6.57 s | +0.08 s | |
| 7.02 s | +0.53 s | |
| 7.03 s | +0.54 s | |
| 7.12 s | +0.63 s | |
| 7.32 s | +0.83 s | |
| 7.33 s | +0.84 s | |
| 8.23 s | +1.74 s |
The difference between best and worst was 26.8% (1.74 s).
Ice Handling
Ice handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 25.8 s | Best | |
| 27.4 s | +1.60 s | |
| 28.2 s | +2.40 s | |
| 29.8 s | +4.00 s | |
| 29.8 s | +4.00 s | |
| 30 s | +4.20 s | |
| 30.1 s | +4.30 s | |
| 30.2 s | +4.40 s |
The difference between best and worst was 17.1% (4.4 s).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.99 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 8.12 kg/t | +0.13 kg/t | £7 | |
| 8.26 kg/t | +0.27 kg/t | £15 | |
| 8.29 kg/t | +0.30 kg/t | £17 | |
| 8.81 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t | £45 | |
| 8.87 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | £49 | |
| 8.95 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | £53 | |
| 9.07 kg/t | +1.08 kg/t | £60 |
The difference between best and worst was 13.5% (1.08 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Michelin Alpin A4 uses about 41 L (£60) more fuel than the Debica Frigo 2.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter Tyre Test
185/65 R1516 tyres tested
4 of these 8 tyres tested again
2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test
205/55 R1611 tyres tested
4 of these 8 tyres tested again
2018 ACE All Season and Winter Tyre Test
185/65 R1512 tyres tested
4 of these 8 tyres tested again

