Menu
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 View Gallery (1)

Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2

Nexen Tyres High Performance Winter Next

The Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 is a High Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
73%
Road Feedback
73%
Handling
74%
Wear
87%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
75%
Snow Grip
82%
Ice Grip
73%
11 Reviews
77% Average
111,500 miles driven
8 Tests (avg: 13th)
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2

Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
7.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Comfort
80.9
0.29x / 1 test
Wet
75.7
2x / 6 tests
Snow
67.5
1.5x / 4 tests
Dry
67.2
1.2x / 3 tests
Ice
48.1
1.26x / 3 tests
Value
48
0.38x / 3 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
76.9
5 tests
Braking
64.7
7 tests
Traction
61.5
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 8
Publications: 6
Period: 2016 - 2018
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 77.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.35
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2018 205/55 R16 8/11 10 metrics
2018 ACE All Season and Winter Tyre Test ACE 2018 185/65 R15 9/12 0 metrics
2018 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 6/16 0 metrics
2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 21/52 0 metrics
2017 AC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 Auto Centrum 2017 185/65 R15 6/8 10 metrics
2016 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 37/43 0 metrics
2016 AZ Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 Auto Zeitung 2016 205/55 R16 10/14 0 metrics
2016 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 10/15 0 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
8
Tests
13th
Average
6th
Best
37th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout
195/65 R15 • 2018
21st/52
2018 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16
205/55 R16 • 2018
6th/16
Good in the dry, low wear
Slightly wear on wet roads and in the snow, high fuel consumption
2018 ACE All Season and Winter Tyre Test
185/65 R15 • 2018
9th/12

Alternative Tyres

Semperit Speed Grip 5
8.9/10
Michelin Alpin
7.7/10
86% 9 reviews
Semperit Speed Grip 2
7.4/10
86% 17 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 800
7.2/10
89% 12 reviews
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3
7.0/10
86% 11 reviews
Nokian WR D3
6.8/10
87% 42 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS830
6.7/10
90% 30 reviews
Sava eskimo hp
6.5/10
87% 17 reviews
Michelin Alpin A4
5.5/10
92% 53 reviews
Show All Winter High Performance tyres

Questions and Answers for the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 10 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 positively, praising its value, strong snow/ice confidence, decent dry/wet performance for the price, good comfort, and generally low noise. A minority report notable wet grip/braking weaknesses and, in one case, poor snow/ice confidence; one user found the tyre loud and spongy. Considering the higher-weighted positive reviews, the overall sentiment is favorable with winter capability and price/performance as key strengths.

Strengths
  • Good snow and ice grip
  • Strong value for money
  • Comfortable ride
  • Low noise (most reports)
  • Decent dry performance
  • Adequate wet performance for price
  • Good wear/longevity
Areas for Improvement
  • Wet grip/braking could be better
  • Noise increases with mileage

Top 3 Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Reviews

Given 56% while driving a BMW 335d (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Incredibly loud tyres, rumbling since the first kilometer. Driving experience rather spongy but comfortably soft
Ask a question | Helpful 844
July 5, 2024
Given 72% while driving a SEAT Ibiza TSi (185/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
I was using nokian wr4 before, I didn't see a big difference between them, wet braking and wet grip were not very satisfying, but snow and ice grip was good.
Ask a question | Helpful 1039
April 5, 2023
Given 54% while driving a Audi 2.0tdi 140 sline sportback (205/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 7,000 average miles
I've been driving on these tires for two seasons now, they're ok in the dry, but nothing much. In the wet and rain, they are barely passable. They are dangerous on snow and ice, they do not inspire confidence. They are not noisy, are comfortable, they don't wear out much. I would not buy again
Ask a question | Helpful 966
September 11, 2022
Have you driven on the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 >

Latest Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Ford Mondeo TDCI (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 25,000 average miles
For the money it’s perfect tyre
Ask a question | Helpful 970
November 15, 2021
Given 89% while driving a Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI (185/60 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Bought these because my Sava Eskimo S3+ needed replacement. For first winter I'm very impressed, very good grip in every condition. In comparison to Sava, they offer much more grip, especially in wet and they are much more quieter (previously on motorways I thought that irritating noise is coming from the wheel bearing or engine but after replacing tyres noise was gone). I don't feel any difference in snow between Nexen and Sava but I feel much more confident driving on Nexen then Sava. Excellent tyre for the money, highly recommended!!
Ask a question | Helpful 939
February 21, 2019
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 89% while driving a Honda Accord Tourer Type S (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 9,000 spirited miles
Bought these tyres in favor of the Nokian WR d3 because they were cheaper like 20 euros a pice . In the snow i was impressed , grip in the wet and dry is decent for my 210 hp 2.2 D Type S Accord . Its a solid tyre , comfort is very good . I have used nexen as summer tyres on my other cars and thats why i decided to give them a try on there winter tyres , very happy with my purches ! I recomand theme
Ask a question | Helpful 547
October 9, 2017
Given 87% while driving a Renault Megane (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
Having these tyres for about 5 months and they didn't dissapointed at all. I've noticed the change immediately and the feeling is pretty positive. I have been surprised how well they perform on both dry and wet, considering their price range.
I was thinking of buying more expensive tyres, but I'm glad I bought these ones. So far, so good.
Ask a question | Helpful 575
March 30, 2017
Given 91% while driving a Fiat Scudo combi van (215/60 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 11,000 average miles
Wonderful Winter tire. Price and Quality %90
Ask a question | Helpful 573
March 29, 2017
Given 80% while driving a BMW 218d Active Tourer (205/60 R16 V) on mostly motorways for 7,000 spirited miles
Very good tire for the price! The initial 5000km they were very silent, not that much now at 10000km on them! Good fuel consumption! Have been using them on dry and wet tarmac in temperatures from -20 to 5 degrees (winter in Romania), but have seen some 10cm snow and a lot of slush these days and they seem reasuring up to 110km/h.
Ask a question | Helpful 741
February 8, 2017
Given 84% while driving a Vauxhall Combo 1.7 (185/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
These tyres are great, finally got a bit of snow recently and got to play with them and they didn't disappoint. I drive quite hard and aggressive so I push the tyres hard and in the wet I sometimes feel there struggling but never had an issue.
These tyres were really well priced, are lasting well and inspire confidence in winter conditions.
Ask a question | Helpful 608
January 18, 2017