Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/60 R16
Tyres tested
11
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
36.8 m -3.00 m 0 km/h
39.8 m Best 0 km/h
40.2 m +0.40 m 13 km/h
41.2 m +1.40 m 24 km/h
41.6 m +1.80 m 27 km/h
42.3 m +2.50 m 32 km/h
42.4 m +2.60 m 32 km/h
42.6 m +2.80 m 33 km/h
42.9 m +3.10 m 35 km/h
RefReference Winter
44 m +4.20 m 40 km/h
44.1 m +4.30 m 41 km/h
44.4 m +4.60 m 42 km/h
44.5 m +4.70 m 42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 20.9% (7.7 m ≈ 1.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Toyo Celsius would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Michelin CrossClimate+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
102.3 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
102.2 km/h -0.10 km/h
102.1 km/h -0.20 km/h
101.7 km/h -0.60 km/h
101.5 km/h -0.80 km/h
101.5 km/h -0.80 km/h
101.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
101 km/h -1.30 km/h
100.7 km/h -1.60 km/h
RefReference Winter
100.5 km/h -1.80 km/h
100.4 km/h -1.90 km/h
100.3 km/h -2.00 km/h
99.8 km/h -2.50 km/h

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
51.9 m Best 0 km/h
52.1 m +0.20 m 8 km/h
RefReference Summer
52.9 m +1.00 m 18 km/h
54.2 m +2.30 m 27 km/h
54.9 m +3.00 m 30 km/h
56.1 m +4.20 m 36 km/h
56.4 m +4.50 m 37 km/h
RefReference Winter
56.6 m +4.70 m 37 km/h
57.5 m +5.60 m 41 km/h
58.2 m +6.30 m 43 km/h
60.6 m +8.70 m 49 km/h
64.5 m +12.60 m 57 km/h
68.7 m +16.80 m 64 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 32.4% (16.8 m ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nankang Cross Seasons AW6 would still be travelling at 64 km/h when the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
63.3 km/h Best
63.3 km/h Best
63.1 km/h -0.20 km/h
RefReference Summer
63 km/h -0.30 km/h
62.8 km/h -0.50 km/h
62.6 km/h -0.70 km/h
62 km/h -1.30 km/h
61.4 km/h -1.90 km/h
RefReference Winter
61.1 km/h -2.20 km/h
60.6 km/h -2.70 km/h
60.3 km/h -3.00 km/h
59.7 km/h -3.60 km/h
59.3 km/h -4.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6.3% (4 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
83.7 km/h Best
79.5 km/h -4.20 km/h
79.2 km/h -4.50 km/h
RefReference Summer
79.1 km/h -4.60 km/h
79 km/h -4.70 km/h
78.3 km/h -5.40 km/h
RefReference Winter
77.7 km/h -6.00 km/h
77.6 km/h -6.10 km/h
76.2 km/h -7.50 km/h
74.7 km/h -9.00 km/h
74.3 km/h -9.40 km/h
69.3 km/h -14.40 km/h
68.2 km/h -15.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 18.5% (15.5 Km/H).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Winter
23 m -0.10 m 0 km/h
23.1 m Best 0 km/h
23.5 m +0.40 m 17 km/h
23.7 m +0.60 m 21 km/h
23.8 m +0.70 m 22 km/h
23.8 m +0.70 m 22 km/h
24 m +0.90 m 25 km/h
24.1 m +1.00 m 26 km/h
24.3 m +1.20 m 29 km/h
24.5 m +1.40 m 31 km/h
24.7 m +1.60 m 33 km/h
25.7 m +2.60 m 41 km/h
RefReference Summer
57.2 m +34.10 m 100 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 148.7% (34.2 m ≈ 7.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV would still be travelling at 41 km/h when the Continental AllSeasonContact had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3460 N Best
3450 N -10.00 N
3445 N -15.00 N
3420 N -40.00 N
3415 N -45.00 N
3395 N -65.00 N
RefReference Winter
3364 N -96.00 N
3363 N -97.00 N
3347 N -113.00 N
3294 N -166.00 N
3293 N -167.00 N
3263 N -197.00 N
RefReference Summer
1191 N -2,269.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 65.6% (2,269 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
45.4 km/h +0.50 km/h
44.9 km/h Best
44.1 km/h -0.80 km/h
43.7 km/h -1.20 km/h
43.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
43.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
43.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
43.5 km/h -1.40 km/h
43.4 km/h -1.50 km/h
42.6 km/h -2.30 km/h
42.5 km/h -2.40 km/h
41.3 km/h -3.60 km/h
RefReference Summer
28.1 km/h -16.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 38.1% (17.3 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
67 dB Best
RefReference Summer
67.1 dB +0.10 dB
67.1 dB +0.10 dB
67.3 dB +0.30 dB
67.3 dB +0.30 dB
67.4 dB +0.40 dB
67.7 dB +0.70 dB
67.7 dB +0.70 dB
RefReference Winter
68.1 dB +1.10 dB
68.7 dB +1.70 dB
68.7 dB +1.70 dB
69.1 dB +2.10 dB
69.3 dB +2.30 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.4% (2.3 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.85 kg/t Best £0
6.92 kg/t +0.07 kg/t £5
7.11 kg/t +0.26 kg/t £17
7.29 kg/t +0.44 kg/t £28
7.36 kg/t +0.51 kg/t £33
7.42 kg/t +0.57 kg/t £37
7.64 kg/t +0.79 kg/t £51
7.67 kg/t +0.82 kg/t £53
RefReference Summer
7.74 kg/t +0.89 kg/t £57
RefReference Winter
7.87 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £66
8.36 kg/t +1.51 kg/t £97
8.43 kg/t +1.58 kg/t £102
9.29 kg/t +2.44 kg/t £157

The difference between best and worst was 35.6% (2.44 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Toyo Celsius uses about 108 L (£157) more fuel than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.