Menu

Test Charts / Teknikens Varld

2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/55 R16
Tyres tested
16
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

This test ranks different groups separately. Read the full verdicts for each group; there is no single overall finishing order.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Dry Braking: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
29.4 m — —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Dry Braking: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
31.5 m Best 0 km/h
31.5 m Best 0 km/h
31.5 m Best 0 km/h
31.6 m +0.10 m 7 km/h
31.8 m +0.30 m 13 km/h
31.8 m +0.30 m 13 km/h

Studded Winter Tyres

Dry Braking: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
29.9 m Best 0 km/h
31 m +1.10 m 24 km/h
31.1 m +1.20 m 26 km/h
31.4 m +1.50 m 28 km/h
31.5 m +1.60 m 29 km/h
31.5 m +1.60 m 29 km/h
31.7 m +1.80 m 31 km/h
32.7 m +2.80 m 38 km/h
33.44 m +3.54 m 42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 13.7% (4.04 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Hankook Winter i pike RS2 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

2

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Wet Braking: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
28.9 m — —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Wet Braking: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
32.3 m Best 0 km/h
33.5 m +1.20 m 25 km/h
33.8 m +1.50 m 27 km/h
33.8 m +1.50 m 27 km/h
34.4 m +2.10 m 32 km/h
36.1 m +3.80 m 42 km/h

Studded Winter Tyres

Wet Braking: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
33.6 m Best 0 km/h
33.7 m +0.10 m 7 km/h
34 m +0.40 m 14 km/h
34.9 m +1.30 m 25 km/h
35.4 m +1.80 m 29 km/h
35.9 m +2.30 m 33 km/h
36 m +2.40 m 34 km/h
37.3 m +3.70 m 41 km/h
37.3 m +3.70 m 41 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 29.1% (8.4 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kumho WinterCraft Ice Wi32 would still be travelling at 62 km/h when the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Wet Handling: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to best
33.5 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Wet Handling: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
35.4 s Best
35.5 s +0.10 s
35.5 s +0.10 s
35.5 s +0.10 s
35.6 s +0.20 s
35.7 s +0.30 s

Studded Winter Tyres

Wet Handling: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
35 s Best
35.2 s +0.20 s
35.2 s +0.20 s
35.3 s +0.30 s
35.3 s +0.30 s
35.7 s +0.70 s
35.8 s +0.80 s
36.2 s +1.20 s
36.5 s +1.50 s

The difference between best and worst was 9% (3 s).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Snow Braking: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
54.5 m — —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Snow Braking: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
51 m Best 0 km/h
51.1 m +0.10 m 6 km/h
51.5 m +0.50 m 13 km/h
52.1 m +1.10 m 19 km/h
52.3 m +1.30 m 20 km/h
52.3 m +1.30 m 20 km/h

Studded Winter Tyres

Snow Braking: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
50.6 m Best 0 km/h
50.7 m +0.10 m 6 km/h
51 m +0.40 m 12 km/h
51.4 m +0.80 m 16 km/h
51.4 m +0.80 m 16 km/h
51.5 m +0.90 m 17 km/h
51.9 m +1.30 m 21 km/h
52.1 m +1.50 m 22 km/h
52.5 m +1.90 m 25 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 7.7% (3.9 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 would still be travelling at 35 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time (5 - 35 km/h)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Snow Traction: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to best
6.3 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Snow Traction: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
5.7 s Best
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.9 s +0.20 s
5.9 s +0.20 s
5.9 s +0.20 s

Studded Winter Tyres

Snow Traction: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
5.7 s Best
5.7 s Best
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.9 s +0.20 s
5.9 s +0.20 s
5.9 s +0.20 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (0.6 s).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Snow Handling: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to best
55.9 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Snow Handling: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
52.7 s Best
53.1 s +0.40 s
53.2 s +0.50 s
53.4 s +0.70 s
53.6 s +0.90 s
53.6 s +0.90 s

Studded Winter Tyres

Snow Handling: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
52.3 s Best
52.7 s +0.40 s
53.1 s +0.80 s
53.3 s +1.00 s
53.4 s +1.10 s
53.4 s +1.10 s
53.5 s +1.20 s
53.7 s +1.40 s
55.3 s +3.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (3.6 s).

Ice

3

Ice Braking

Ice braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Ice Braking: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
57.2 m — —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Ice Braking: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
44.4 m Best 0 km/h
46 m +1.60 m 24 km/h
46.5 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
48.8 m +4.40 m 39 km/h
49.5 m +5.10 m 42 km/h
51.7 m +7.30 m 49 km/h

Studded Winter Tyres

Ice Braking: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
36.4 m Best 0 km/h
37.9 m +1.50 m 26 km/h
38.8 m +2.40 m 32 km/h
39 m +2.60 m 34 km/h
40.1 m +3.70 m 39 km/h
40.9 m +4.50 m 43 km/h
41.8 m +5.40 m 47 km/h
42.2 m +5.80 m 48 km/h
43.3 m +6.90 m 52 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 57.1% (20.8 m ≈ 4.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 would still be travelling at 78 km/h when the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Ice Traction

Ice acceleration time (5 - 20 km/h)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Ice Traction: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to best
6.7 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Ice Traction: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
5.1 s Best
5.2 s +0.10 s
5.4 s +0.30 s
5.5 s +0.40 s
5.6 s +0.50 s
6 s +0.90 s

Studded Winter Tyres

Ice Traction: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.6 s Best
3.7 s +0.10 s
3.8 s +0.20 s
3.9 s +0.30 s
3.9 s +0.30 s
3.9 s +0.30 s
4 s +0.40 s
4.2 s +0.60 s
4.4 s +0.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 86.1% (3.1 s).

Ice Handling

Ice handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tyres

Ice Handling: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to best
74.7 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Ice Handling: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
65 s Best
65.8 s +0.80 s
66.6 s +1.60 s
68.6 s +3.60 s
70 s +5.00 s
70 s +5.00 s

Studded Winter Tyres

Ice Handling: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
54.1 s Best
54.5 s +0.40 s
55.1 s +1.00 s
55.6 s +1.50 s
55.6 s +1.50 s
55.8 s +1.70 s
57.8 s +3.70 s
60.3 s +6.20 s
62.7 s +8.60 s

The difference between best and worst was 38.1% (20.6 s).

Comfort

1

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑

Central European Winter Tyres

Subj. Noise: Central European Winter Tyres
TyreResultGap to best
8 Points —

Nordic Friction Winter Tyres

Subj. Noise: Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points

Studded Winter Tyres

Subj. Noise: Studded Winter Tyres
Position / TyreResultGap to best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
5 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 50% (5 Points).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Snow Traction
5 → 35 km/h
Ice Braking
50 → 0 km/h
Ice Traction
5 → 20 km/h
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.